Feb 20 2007
Realism On The War On Terror
A must read on the real status of the war on terrorism, if for nothing else than to take a break from the know-nothing, breathless doomsayers in the liberal media (who are never right about anything – including UFOs). A sneak peak:
Part of the problem is that we attribute preternatural qualities to the terrorists while establishing standards for our own success that are unattainable. For example, the notion that anything at all is going according to al Qaeda’s plan is nonsense. Bin Laden laid out the strategic goals of the organization in his 1996 Declaration of War. What would winning look like in their framework? Osama bin Laden the most popular leader in the Muslim world, revered by all, leading an increasingly united nation of true believers. Attacks on U.S. and Coalition military installations and warships throughout the region, sometimes resulting in major losses, leading to a comprehensive retreat from the Middle East. Regimes in the region suffering internal revolts, riots, a breakdown of the internal security apparatus, mutinies among their troops, assassinations of key leaders, and eventually armies of mujahedeen seizing control of the capitals and pledging allegiance to bin Laden’s growing empire. A united Palestinian movement, religious in orientation and loyal to the al Qaeda program, waging a war to the death on an increasingly beleaguered and strategically isolated Israel. Incessant, occasionally dramatic attacks in the West and especially in the United States, showing the puissance of the movement and its ability to inflict damage on the U.S. at times and places of their choosing.
Strangely, you talk to a die hard liberal and this is exactly what they see! It seems the conservative movement came just in time. Otherwise Bin Laden would be the ruler of the entire ME has liberals made their way to his throne to bow down and beg his indulgence. Thankfully, things are not actually going that way at all for the Islamo Fascists (or the liberals).
Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari, the terrorist financier indicted on charges that he arranged for $152,000 worth of bank transfers to fund a terror training camp also gave $15,000.00 to the National Republican Congressional Committee.
Thus proving it’s true – electing Republicans directly supports al-Qaeda recruiting efforts around the world.
Or someone want’s to throw out a little money to give that impression in case he is taken down.
Sometimes ships fly false flags.
Try as you might, you neocons are not going to change “Barbary Pirates” to”Barbary Jihadists” nor are you going to obfuscate the WMD lies, as Bush conceded the Kay report’s findings and hasn’t gone near the diversions , which should give you a clue as to how
politically utile they are.
Nazi werewolves are another phantom-like exagerration of the neocons-their activity was in fact sporadically feeble .
I never advocated disarming of guns in America-if Lurker finds
a jihad lurking within our borders, he is welcome to off him.
As for jihad activity in the Mideast, it will grown as long
as the US finances Israel’s oppression of Palestinians and
occupies Iraq. Every poll taken in the Moslem world says so.
Look, if you are willing to follow the party of “is, is then there is just nothing that we can discuss. For truth is a lie and lies are the truth with the party of “is, is”. Pure and simple.
http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/001342.html#more
Lurker’s lies about WMDs exposed as Israeli-financed via Frank Gaffney.
Ivehadit is right, you just want to follow the party of defeatism. It’s also so typical of the 1938 mentality.
Frank Gaffney is part of the party of defeatism. There are other sources that confirm that Saddam had WMDs and planned to rebuild WMDs once those sanctions lifted. There are other sources that showed strong connections between Saddam and AQ / terrorism.
Those WMDs have also been moved outside Iraq weeks before our invasion of Iraq, a correct war.
The jihadists are in VA. Check the links:
Jamaat ul-Fuqra in Virginia, Part 1
Check the subheadings of this site:
“At the siege of Vienna in 1683 Islam seemed poised to overrun Christian Europe. We are in a new phase of a very old war.”
Have you checked:
Jihad Watch
as Bush conceded the Kay report’s findings and hasn’t gone near the diversions , which should give you a clue as to how
politically utile they are.
WTF do you think this was , a fire sale on 55 gallon drums?
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1986/645/1600/syria-iraq-wmd1.jpg
I know you don’t have access to the high resolution version of the picture I posted above. So I will give ya a clue.
It shows Russian trucks and if you read the nametags on the chest of those present they are all Russian and each name has been tracked back to the Russian Stassi..
They were taking back their soup kitchen of bad soup to just to get it out of dodge.
You are so without a hope that it stands as an immortal wonder.
Good thing some of us are anchored in reality to compensate.
Yes I know it is a hard problem to read name tags from a vertical above shot but you can do wonders with the right software.
If the cutting edge can make it happen they will.
Shall we get on to your next rant or just watch you fade away?
Even though a picture shot can be worth a thousand words, the image at the edge can be telling. That 4% shot can be telling and forewarning.
Analysis leads to knowledge an fruitful facts.
“Frank Gaffney is part of the party of defeatism. There are other sources that confirm that Saddam had WMDs and planned to rebuild WMDs once those sanctions lifted. There are other sources that showed strong connections between Saddam and AQ / terrorism.
Those WMDs have also been moved outside Iraq weeks before our invasion of Iraq, a correct war.”
Gaffney is more or less on your side, so your comment shows you didn’t bother to read the link. If you would stop to consider how
false your data is, you would understand why even Bush is not stupid enough to defend himself with it. Or maybe you believe Bush
is stupid and forgive him because he means well, even though his
support from the public would go up dramatically if he
used the “we never went to the moon” “evidence.” Or maybe you
believe he can’t use it because it would only expose how
dumb he was for not intercepting the WMDs?
But you’re right about ONE and only ONE thing: Saddam, if we
a ruler worth his salt, wanted to eventually break out of the
box Powell and Rice assured the public he was in, and obtain
weapons with which to defend his country. Then again, your
rationale would give sanction to attacking every country that
“wanted” weaponry you believe only Israel should have.
Arrogance comes home to roost-that is , sink in the quagmire.