Jul 18 2007
Bin Laden Intermediary In Iraq Exposes al-Qaeda Sham In Iraq
The ‘sectarian’ violence, as the news media loves to call the war between moderate muslims and the Islamo Fascists of al-qaeda, has been exposed as a fraud. There is not an Iraqis Islamo Fascist movement that is a cousin to al-Qaeda – it IS al-Qaeda and its foreigners killing Iraqi Muslims:
A senior operative for al Qaeda in Iraq who was caught this month has told his U.S. military interrogators a prominent al Qaeda-led group is just a front and its leader fictitious, a military spokesman said on Wednesday.
Brigadier-General Kevin Bergner told a news conference that Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, leader of the self-styled Islamic State of Iraq, which was purportedly set up last year, did not exist.
The Islamic State of Iraq was established to try to put an Iraqi face on what is a foreign-driven network, Bergner said. The name Baghdadi means the person hails from the Iraqi capital.
Bergner said the information came from an operative called Khalid al-Mashadani who was caught on July 4 and who he said was an intermediary to Osama bin Laden.
No wonder Iraqi tribes are literally up in arms against al-Qaeda. It is now an admission by al-Qaeda that the unrest in Iraq is driven by outsiders trying to foment civil war and play on the biases and prejudices of the US media and political left. Talk about being duped. The bloodshed in Iraq is from al-Qaeda and the locals are allying with us to fight this foreign invasion. Those bloody massacres are by foriegn fascists willing to kill as many muslims as it takes to get on the evening news in America.
“In his words, the Islamic State of Iraq is a front organization that masks the foreign influence and leadership within al Qaeda in Iraq in an attempt to put an Iraqi face on the leadership of al Qaeda in Iraq,” Bergner said.
In his words: it is all a facade. We ARE fighting al-Qaeda in Iraq, and not primarily Iraqis. The Arab/Muslim street is going to go ballistic on this news. Not only is al-Qaeda massacring thousands of muslims, they are lying abou their role in these deaths.
To get a lot more in depth information, here is a link to the Pentagon Channel. After you get to the site click on Briefings/Townhalls and then click play on Iraq Briefing 18 July 2007
When I hear supposedly well-informed people like Sen. Carl Levin (on FNS this weekend) remark repeatedly on us sitting in on an Iraqi civil war, I cringe. A conflict is not “civil war” when the actors are either foreign armies or domestics being manipulated by foreign actors. Crikey!
I heard that the fighters in Iraq are from all over the world, Europe as well as the mideast. But the Democrats say we should send more men to Afghanistan to fight AlQaida.
And are we to believe that Al Q was in every other country in the world EXCEPT Iraq? Suuuuurrrre.
How stupid do the democrats think we are….
Who’s got a scorecard?…
The British cotton merchant, who reveals that there really is no CSA and that Jefferson Davis is an invention. He doesn’t really exist. … This seems to be the case with the Islamic State of Iraq…
Who’s got a scorecard?…
The British cotton merchant, who reveals that there really is no CSA and that Jefferson Davis is an invention. He doesn’t really exist. … This seems to be the case with the Islamic State of Iraq….
More hogwash on al-Qaeda.
Strataspheristas and other upporters of the war in Iraq often claim that a withdrawal of US forces would lead to an al Qaeda takeover of Iraq, yet according to Pentagon war games this scenario is highly unlikely:
The Pentagon simulations on a US withdrawal find that the most likely scenario would be three-way split of the country between Kurds, Shias, and Sunnis. While the breakup might be “ugly,” with possibly “tens of thousands of people dying,’ an al Qaeda takeover of Iraq would not be possible by any stretch of the imagination.
So, Sooth, does this mean you support the results of all Pentagon gaming simulations now?
I guess that means Zawahiri doesn’t agree with the Pentagon. For shame.