Comments on: Media Frenzy on Dean http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/103 High Flying Political Debate Thu, 24 May 2012 14:43:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Mark in Mexico http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/103/comment-page-1#comment-62 Mark in Mexico Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:38:41 +0000 http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=103#comment-62 <strong>Howard Dean Hates White Chritians?</strong> Question by Brian Wilson, Fox News: "You say you hate Republicans - does that mean you also hate white Christians?" Howard Dean: Howard Dean Hates White Chritians?

Question by Brian Wilson, Fox News: “You say you hate Republicans – does that mean you also hate white Christians?”

Howard Dean:

]]> By: AJStrata http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/103/comment-page-1#comment-60 AJStrata Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:50:42 +0000 http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=103#comment-60 I agree. I saw the article and glanced at it, but have had to deal with an Instalanche since we were referrenced on a major site. I decided to wait for the formal presentation to see if what you and suspect will come to pass I agree. I saw the article and glanced at it, but have had to deal with an Instalanche since we were referrenced on a major site. I decided to wait for the formal presentation to see if what you and suspect will come to pass

]]> By: milldini17 http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/103/comment-page-1#comment-58 milldini17 Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:29:54 +0000 http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=103#comment-58 AJStrata- I guess this might seem like a change in subject from the post, but I dont know other way to put this out (it seemed fitting because of more Dem Cro-Magnonism). The Washington post has this story, thanks to Drudge, about more talks by the GOP on Soc Sec reform. Most of the info is mum, according to Sen. Grassley R-Iowa, but he did say that there is progression in the finance committee. From what I can pick out, the 11 Rep are trying to build a consenual plan that has a high potential of making it through the House and Senate. And, as usual, the Dems talk of immmediate refusal of a bill containing anything of Bush's plan of private accounts, even if the bill only calls for partial privatization. The moral of the story basically comes down to that the GOP once again are not playing petty games and being willing to compromise a deal in the best interest of the nation while the Dems stubbornly try to show they have "values" or even basic economic 101 knowledge and bog down the legislation process for absolutely no reason. This country was founded on the idea of comprimise, dammit. Dems need to quit whining. So here is the URL, because I seem to be PC illiterate at the moment: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/09/AR2005060901775_pf.html. AJStrata-
I guess this might seem like a change in subject from the post, but I dont know other way to put this out (it seemed fitting because of more Dem Cro-Magnonism). The Washington post has this story, thanks to Drudge, about more talks by the GOP on Soc Sec reform. Most of the info is mum, according to Sen. Grassley R-Iowa, but he did say that there is progression in the finance committee. From what I can pick out, the 11 Rep are trying to build a consenual plan that has a high potential of making it through the House and Senate. And, as usual, the Dems talk of immmediate refusal of a bill containing anything of Bush’s plan of private accounts, even if the bill only calls for partial privatization. The moral of the story basically comes down to that the GOP once again are not playing petty games and being willing to compromise a deal in the best interest of the nation while the Dems stubbornly try to show they have “values” or even basic economic 101 knowledge and bog down the legislation process for absolutely no reason. This country was founded on the idea of comprimise, dammit. Dems need to quit whining. So here is the URL, because I seem to be PC illiterate at the moment: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/09/AR2005060901775_pf.html.

]]>