<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O-Bomba!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/10375/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/10375</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:09:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWS</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/10375/comment-page-1#comment-487824</link>
		<dc:creator>WWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=10375#comment-487824</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found a very good link, slightly off topic for this post but on topic for something you&#039;ve written much about, the Stimulus Bill.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/159355-the-non-stimulating-stimulus-bill?source=from_friend

A VERY good financial analysis showing precisely why there is almost no actual stimulus coming from the &quot;stimulus&quot; bill, not now or ever.  It was a sham that consisted of 88% transfer payments, which by definition are never &quot;stimulating&quot; to an economy. 

For our nearly $1 trillion spent on this bill, the country is only going to get about $12 billion in actual stimulus spending in 2009.  Yes, that is just over 1% of the total cost that is actually going to help economic activity.  

&quot;From my supply-side perspective, 88% of the stimulus bill (transfers and tax breaks) will amount to taking money from one person and giving it to another, while only 12% (spending on goods and services) will involve new government spending that absorbs (inefficiently) resources from the private sector.&quot;

&quot;As Mike noted in a paper last March, of the $88 billion in federal purchases of goods and services, &quot;only about $12 billion will be spent in the current fiscal year, with only an additional $26 billion slated to be spent in 2010.&quot; So we&#039;re really talking small potatoes here.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found a very good link, slightly off topic for this post but on topic for something you&#8217;ve written much about, the Stimulus Bill.</p>
<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/159355-the-non-stimulating-stimulus-bill?source=from_friend" rel="nofollow">http://seekingalpha.com/article/159355-the-non-stimulating-stimulus-bill?source=from_friend</a></p>
<p>A VERY good financial analysis showing precisely why there is almost no actual stimulus coming from the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; bill, not now or ever.  It was a sham that consisted of 88% transfer payments, which by definition are never &#8220;stimulating&#8221; to an economy. </p>
<p>For our nearly $1 trillion spent on this bill, the country is only going to get about $12 billion in actual stimulus spending in 2009.  Yes, that is just over 1% of the total cost that is actually going to help economic activity.  </p>
<p>&#8220;From my supply-side perspective, 88% of the stimulus bill (transfers and tax breaks) will amount to taking money from one person and giving it to another, while only 12% (spending on goods and services) will involve new government spending that absorbs (inefficiently) resources from the private sector.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;As Mike noted in a paper last March, of the $88 billion in federal purchases of goods and services, &#8220;only about $12 billion will be spent in the current fiscal year, with only an additional $26 billion slated to be spent in 2010.&#8221; So we&#8217;re really talking small potatoes here.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frogg1</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/10375/comment-page-1#comment-487802</link>
		<dc:creator>Frogg1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=10375#comment-487802</guid>
		<description>You know, Kathie, I still think the Repubs biggest problem is in messaging.   Read this, and you&#039;ll see what I mean:

THE CULT OF ICONOGRAPHY
http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/

excerpt:

.....Exact same content. Different packaging. I believe the conservative message is, on balance, the most nutritious philosophical meal ever devised. But the packaging of that message has been an unmitigated disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Kathie, I still think the Repubs biggest problem is in messaging.   Read this, and you&#8217;ll see what I mean:</p>
<p>THE CULT OF ICONOGRAPHY<br />
<a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/" rel="nofollow">http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/</a></p>
<p>excerpt:</p>
<p>&#8230;..Exact same content. Different packaging. I believe the conservative message is, on balance, the most nutritious philosophical meal ever devised. But the packaging of that message has been an unmitigated disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frogg1</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/10375/comment-page-1#comment-487795</link>
		<dc:creator>Frogg1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=10375#comment-487795</guid>
		<description>Rasmussen: Democrats at lowest point in generic-ballot polling in years
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/09/01/rasmussen-democrats-at-lowest-point-in-generic-ballot-polling-in-years/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen: Democrats at lowest point in generic-ballot polling in years<br />
<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/09/01/rasmussen-democrats-at-lowest-point-in-generic-ballot-polling-in-years/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2009/09/01/rasmussen-democrats-at-lowest-point-in-generic-ballot-polling-in-years/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathie</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/10375/comment-page-1#comment-487691</link>
		<dc:creator>kathie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=10375#comment-487691</guid>
		<description>Now the question is, are there any really smart republicans standing in the wings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the question is, are there any really smart republicans standing in the wings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

