<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FISA Mutiny?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Battle For America Has Begun</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3156</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Battle For America Has Begun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3156</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes, the idea is for the freeing of terrorists who have been caught red handed planning to kill Americans simply because the FISA Court could not accept their new, more limited role. FISA did not want to taint their process with NSA information. The prudes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes, the idea is for the freeing of terrorists who have been caught red handed planning to kill Americans simply because the FISA Court could not accept their new, more limited role. FISA did not want to taint their process with NSA information. The prudes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FISA Fought 9-11 Changes, Demanded Gorelick Wall Stay</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FISA Fought 9-11 Changes, Demanded Gorelick Wall Stay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>[...] It is becoming more and more evident some FISA judges (James Robertson?)were resisting common sense changes to the intelligence and law enforcement process that would enhance our chances of thwarting future 9-11 attacks. Our reader SBD commented on our previous post this morning and provides clear evidence the FISA wars started early on, less than a year after 9-11, and as we all know have been escalating ever since. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is becoming more and more evident some FISA judges (James Robertson?)were resisting common sense changes to the intelligence and law enforcement process that would enhance our chances of thwarting future 9-11 attacks. Our reader SBD commented on our previous post this morning and provides clear evidence the FISA wars started early on, less than a year after 9-11, and as we all know have been escalating ever since. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIGDOG</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>BIGDOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>AJ

I believe you left out an extremely important piece to the puzzle to this FISA, Intellegence, CIA, Secret Courts...etc...etc.

Its real obvious the Bush admnistration has faced a cross fire of leaks and BS rhetorical assertions. The CIA is behind what i believe is an attempt to bring Bush down. This article speaks of an important player in this game besides Wilson and PlameGate and the others you mentioned. I think we agree Joe Wilson isnt a man of integrity. OK hes a ^%*^*%# *  liar.

However take notice of this guy. Jim Pavitt whom i believe is our disgruntled CIA director, who has a grudge. He sits in the background and is unnoticed. Mabe im speculating but it seems odd.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Pavitt

&quot;It is believed Mr. Pavitt and Mr. Tenet&#039;s departures had something to do with the Valerie Plame scandal or with the inability to catch Osama bin Laden.&quot;




NYT slams Pavitt and the CIA.

http://www.geocities.com/dulfkotte/chief.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ</p>
<p>I believe you left out an extremely important piece to the puzzle to this FISA, Intellegence, CIA, Secret Courts&#8230;etc&#8230;etc.</p>
<p>Its real obvious the Bush admnistration has faced a cross fire of leaks and BS rhetorical assertions. The CIA is behind what i believe is an attempt to bring Bush down. This article speaks of an important player in this game besides Wilson and PlameGate and the others you mentioned. I think we agree Joe Wilson isnt a man of integrity. OK hes a ^%*^*%# *  liar.</p>
<p>However take notice of this guy. Jim Pavitt whom i believe is our disgruntled CIA director, who has a grudge. He sits in the background and is unnoticed. Mabe im speculating but it seems odd.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Pavitt" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Pavitt</a></p>
<p>&#8220;It is believed Mr. Pavitt and Mr. Tenet&#8217;s departures had something to do with the Valerie Plame scandal or with the inability to catch Osama bin Laden.&#8221;</p>
<p>NYT slams Pavitt and the CIA.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.geocities.com/dulfkotte/chief.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocities.com/dulfkotte/chief.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Liberal Cabal Against Bush</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3090</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Liberal Cabal Against Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3090</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting post by AJStrata today regarding the wiretap issue. The one point that stuck out was this update: Would anyone be surprised that Judge James Robertson who resigned his post from the FISA court from some unknown reason, has a linkage to 9-11 Commissioner Jamie Gorelick and 9-11 staffer Daniel Marcus (here, then here)? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting post by AJStrata today regarding the wiretap issue. The one point that stuck out was this update: Would anyone be surprised that Judge James Robertson who resigned his post from the FISA court from some unknown reason, has a linkage to 9-11 Commissioner Jamie Gorelick and 9-11 staffer Daniel Marcus (here, then here)? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snapple</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>Snapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 18:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbd</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>sbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>Hi Snapple,
 
Sure, no problem.  These are newly released email exchanges from the FBI regarding FISA.  I was just trying to illustrate the obstruction being faced by the FBI.  The first email, dated October 16, 2003 points out that after 2 years, they might finally get to use the tools authorized by Congress through FISA. The reply says, don&#039;t count on it since they said they will get to the &quot;business records&quot; when they have the time.

The second email, dated May 21, 2004 with the subject MIRACLE, says that they finally got the business records they requested which makes it the first time they received any information in over 2 1/2 years.  It also maked it 7 months since their original request.

SBD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Snapple,</p>
<p>Sure, no problem.  These are newly released email exchanges from the FBI regarding FISA.  I was just trying to illustrate the obstruction being faced by the FBI.  The first email, dated October 16, 2003 points out that after 2 years, they might finally get to use the tools authorized by Congress through FISA. The reply says, don&#8217;t count on it since they said they will get to the &#8220;business records&#8221; when they have the time.</p>
<p>The second email, dated May 21, 2004 with the subject MIRACLE, says that they finally got the business records they requested which makes it the first time they received any information in over 2 1/2 years.  It also maked it 7 months since their original request.</p>
<p>SBD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snapple</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>Snapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>SBD

Can you dumb these memos  down for me? I totally don&#039;t understand what these documents  are hinting at. I do see the name Valerie, but when something is anonymous and not labelled, how do I know if it is true? 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SBD</p>
<p>Can you dumb these memos  down for me? I totally don&#8217;t understand what these documents  are hinting at. I do see the name Valerie, but when something is anonymous and not labelled, how do I know if it is true? </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbd</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1094/comment-page-1#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator>sbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1094#comment-3072</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/foia/fbi_email1.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MESSAGE&lt;/a&gt;
From:xxxxxxx
Sent:xxxxxx
To:xxxxxxxxx
subject: Fwd: Re: Business Records
DECLASSIFIED BY 65179 DMII/CLS
ON 09-08-2005
Forwarded Mail received from :) 1
----- Original Message----:
Date: 10/16/2003 03:48 pm -0400 (Thursday)
From: XXXXXXXXX
TO: XXXXXXXXX
Subject: Re: Business Records


Thanks for teeing up this issue - again. Rather than dragging their collective feet or setting up hurdles - OIPR should be embarrassed that the FBI has used this valuable tool to fight terrorism - exactly ZERO times. The inability of FBI investigators to use this seemingly effective tool has had a direct and clearly adverse impact on our terrorism cases. Quite frankly, Agents have spent the last 2 years screwing around with weak NSLs or using made up voluntary&quot; NSLs literally begging people to give us information in our terrorism cases (try to get info from xxxxxxxxx . The fact that this new FISA tool has 
languish for two years - with no likely usage in the future - is nuts. While radical  militant librarians kick us around - true terrorists benefit from OIPR&#039;s failure to let  us use the tools given to us. THIS SHOULD BE AN OIPR PRIORITY!!!



In any event - the efforts of NLSB to get this back on track are greatly appreciated. (PS - don&#039;t forget OIPRVs the same story)


Privileged and CONFIDENTIAL


&gt;&gt;&gt; 10/16 2:56 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;
Not surprisingly, we (I should say, Pat Rowan) presented OIPR with a finalized application and proposed order for business records, signed by Valerie, and they were all up in arms because we had not coordinated in advance and had not used the form they had and because we are not authorized to appear before the court and they don&#039;t have enough information about the target and . . . I guess, mainly, they were upset because we wanted to accomplish something without their interference. After Pat went through all their grievances and ask  would file something that used their form and met their informational needs, said that it  would depend on OIPR priorities. Which means, I guess, that we get business records after
the last of the initiations sitting on their desks has been filed.


Anyway, does anyo t-~sa?Ea~~-~ heard of a business records form that OIPR has already produced.  could have it but then conceded that he probably would not. Also, per FISC Rule 9, we are told 
that we cannot file something with the court or cannot appear in Court unless we are on some  authorized list.&#039; Does anyone have a ``copy of the FISC rules?

I guess it was too good to be true, that we would actually be able to file something with the FISA Court with our names on it and without it being held up by OIPR. More on this saga to come .. . ..

------------------------------------

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/foia/fbi_email2.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Message&lt;/a&gt;


HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED
DATE 09-08-2005 BY 65179 DMH/CLS
CA# 05-CV-0845
Page 1 of 1
From: ( I xxxxxx (DivO9) (FBI)
&lt;b&gt;Sent: Friday, May 21,2004 12:04 PM&lt;/b&gt;

To: xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: MIRACLES

UNCLASSIFIED&lt;b&gt;
NON-RECORD
UNCLASSIFIED
NON-RECORD

&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;We got out first business record order signed today! It only took two and a half years.&lt;/b&gt;

UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED


SBD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/foia/fbi_email1.pdf" rel="nofollow">MESSAGE</a><br />
From:xxxxxxx<br />
Sent:xxxxxx<br />
To:xxxxxxxxx<br />
subject: Fwd: Re: Business Records<br />
DECLASSIFIED BY 65179 DMII/CLS<br />
ON 09-08-2005<br />
Forwarded Mail received from <img src='http://strata-sphere.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  1<br />
&#8212;&#8211; Original Message&#8212;-:<br />
Date: 10/16/2003 03:48 pm -0400 (Thursday)<br />
From: XXXXXXXXX<br />
TO: XXXXXXXXX<br />
Subject: Re: Business Records</p>
<p>Thanks for teeing up this issue &#8211; again. Rather than dragging their collective feet or setting up hurdles &#8211; OIPR should be embarrassed that the FBI has used this valuable tool to fight terrorism &#8211; exactly ZERO times. The inability of FBI investigators to use this seemingly effective tool has had a direct and clearly adverse impact on our terrorism cases. Quite frankly, Agents have spent the last 2 years screwing around with weak NSLs or using made up voluntary&#8221; NSLs literally begging people to give us information in our terrorism cases (try to get info from xxxxxxxxx . The fact that this new FISA tool has<br />
languish for two years &#8211; with no likely usage in the future &#8211; is nuts. While radical  militant librarians kick us around &#8211; true terrorists benefit from OIPR&#8217;s failure to let  us use the tools given to us. THIS SHOULD BE AN OIPR PRIORITY!!!</p>
<p>In any event &#8211; the efforts of NLSB to get this back on track are greatly appreciated. (PS &#8211; don&#8217;t forget OIPRVs the same story)</p>
<p>Privileged and CONFIDENTIAL</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; 10/16 2:56 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
Not surprisingly, we (I should say, Pat Rowan) presented OIPR with a finalized application and proposed order for business records, signed by Valerie, and they were all up in arms because we had not coordinated in advance and had not used the form they had and because we are not authorized to appear before the court and they don&#8217;t have enough information about the target and . . . I guess, mainly, they were upset because we wanted to accomplish something without their interference. After Pat went through all their grievances and ask  would file something that used their form and met their informational needs, said that it  would depend on OIPR priorities. Which means, I guess, that we get business records after<br />
the last of the initiations sitting on their desks has been filed.</p>
<p>Anyway, does anyo t-~sa?Ea~~-~ heard of a business records form that OIPR has already produced.  could have it but then conceded that he probably would not. Also, per FISC Rule 9, we are told<br />
that we cannot file something with the court or cannot appear in Court unless we are on some  authorized list.&#8217; Does anyone have a &#8220;copy of the FISC rules?</p>
<p>I guess it was too good to be true, that we would actually be able to file something with the FISA Court with our names on it and without it being held up by OIPR. More on this saga to come .. . ..</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/foia/fbi_email2.pdf" rel="nofollow">Message</a></p>
<p>HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED<br />
DATE 09-08-2005 BY 65179 DMH/CLS<br />
CA# 05-CV-0845<br />
Page 1 of 1<br />
From: ( I xxxxxx (DivO9) (FBI)<br />
<b>Sent: Friday, May 21,2004 12:04 PM</b></p>
<p>To: xxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />
Subject: MIRACLES</p>
<p>UNCLASSIFIED<b><br />
NON-RECORD<br />
UNCLASSIFIED<br />
NON-RECORD</p>
<p></b><b>We got out first business record order signed today! It only took two and a half years.</b></p>
<p>UNCLASSIFIED<br />
UNCLASSIFIED</p>
<p>SBD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

