Comments on: Liberal Fawning For World Acceptance Is Pathetic

By: Twitted by USpace123

Twitted by USpace123 — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:27:19 +0000

[...] This post was Twitted by USpace123 [...]

By: owl

owl — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:18:10 +0000

Yikes……….since I mentioned Dianne Feinstien’s name in above post, she seemed to show a lot of support for the troops by putting pressure on The Won yesterday. Makes me wonder if he has finally scared her? Of course, I have seen her show before. Just when you think she sounds so sensible vs the nuts, she will turn. She is a true believer in that UN.

OT but did anyone hear that email Huckabee read on his show? I only caught part of it but it has to rank #1 funny. If anyone got it, it should be posted on every site that is against ObamaCare. GOP should be running that email 24/7 and not say another word. It compares with the Nobel.

By: ivehadit

ivehadit — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:31:50 +0000

Terrye/Owl, I remember reading last year (or before) that President of the World is exactly the goal…but the person who wants that position is g. soros. He is, according to what I remember reading, using the US as the stepping stool to world domination.

Megalamania runneth wild. We have a lot of work ahead of us.

By: Tweets that mention The Strata-Sphere Â» Liberal Fawning For World Acceptance Is Pathetic -- Topsy.com

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:12:44 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Eric Fisher and AJ Strata. AJ Strata said: new: Liberal Fawning For World Acceptance Is Pathetic http://bit.ly/2Algyj [...]

By: lacegrl130

lacegrl130 — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:44:21 +0000

Wow, AJ, Ace linked to this post! Pretty neat! You have been right on target and it is good to see you get some recognition!

By: Frogg1

Frogg1 — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:10:39 +0000

There is a story in NOLA about the difference between Bush and Obama in post Katrina. I had no idea of the dedicated visits Bush made to NO after Katrina to spend time with the people and see how reconstruction was going. 13 exhaustive visits all over the various burroughs and parts of Louisiana lasting all day. No news coverage. Just work. Now Obama gets ready to make his first visit. It will be one town hall. Probably televised nationwide, and reported by the MSM as a President who finally cares about NO.

Bush was a descent man and a good President.

Barack Obama has failed to match George W. Bush’s multiple visits
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/10/barack_obama_has_failed_to_mat.html

By: Frogg1

Frogg1 — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:03:57 +0000

I’ll take the shoes of our enemies also.

AJ, one of your best posts ever!!!

By: owl

owl — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:26:49 +0000

Terrye, I think that is his goal. Call it President of the World with his own little International Court. After he ties us up in knots with so many complications. After all, this is all about what he told Joe Plumber. Share the wealth. Share the power with the world. I don’t think he gives two string beans for ‘this’ country vs The World. Keep your eye on Levin and Feinstein over this in the future. They are big, big on UN as our leader.

BTW, that little Holden investigation came from him. No doubt he has dreams of putting chains on Bush from his chair on high.

By: kathie

kathie — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:25:21 +0000

I have a question. Does the Norwegian Peace Prize committee think that Obama is so weak that they can influence his decisions towards a more palatable international posture, rather then a stance that would be in the best interests of the United States? I think that that is what they are trying to do. Our State Department must believe it as well.

By: Terrye

Terrye — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:57:30 +0000

I thought about that comment about Bush and it just said it all.

When the President has an R behind his name, the Obamabots get a kick out of some Baathist throwing a shoe at him…but when the president is Barack Obama, well the GOP gets compared to the Taliban for failing to share in the joy.

When a president takes the oath of office he swears to defend the Constitution..world opinion is not part of that oath.

And if that kind of thing is so important to Obama and his fan club, maybe they should go to work at the UN and let someone with respect for the Office of the Presidency sit in the Oval Office.

By: owl

owl — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:55:47 +0000

A beautiful post that put into words what I feel about George W Bush. It is the reason I always said that he and Reagan were my favorites. They are the ‘spirit’ of America. They always had the courage to act upon the principles that founded this country. Never a finger in the air to test the polls. Man enough to accept what came their way without BLAMING someone else for the hard decisions they made. Humble. They loved America(first) and understood the job description.

We have many on the right that needs to take a long, hard look at themselves for writing some of the beatings they gave him. He was not perfect. He made some mistakes. He never claimed to be the coming of The One.

He also never gained the praise of Castro, Chavez, and every despot of the World.

By: marksbbr

marksbbr — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:50:03 +0000

This State Department spokesman is a fool. This is not an “accolade” for America, only for Obama. Theodore Roosevelt received the Nobel Peace Prize while in office, for his role in ending the Russian-Japanese war of 1904-05. Few other presidents deserve this distinction. Both Reagan and Bush 41 should have been at least considered, for their part in ending the Cold War and the threat of nuclear annihilation. Even Clinton deserved a consideration, for trying to bring peace in the Middle East, and for working to end the slaughter in the Balkans.

What has Obama accomplished? Has he brought the world any closer to peace? His plans to close Gitmo? Hardly. Planning to withdraw troops from Iraq in a few years? This was Bush’s plan as well. If, in four years, Iran and North Korea had given up their nuclear ambitions, and if Afghanistan stabilizes with a democratic government, then Obama deserves the Nobel. But until then, it is clearly evident that the Nobel Peace Prize is no longer about promoting peace, but is a popularity award, and the Committee’s vision of peace is one’s ability to bow down to oppressive regimes.

By: Neo

Neo — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:10:09 +0000

What exactly is this “our standpoint” crap ??

This Nobel is for Obama, not the State Department.
How dare they usurp the adulation that rightly belongs only to “The Won”.

By: PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » Shoes or Accolades?

PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » Shoes or Accolades? — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:08:41 +0000

[...] the line a dig at President Bush? Of course it is. Indeed, in many ways the Prize itself is a dig at, if not a [...]

By: kathie

kathie — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:24:03 +0000

This is also good. I love Charles. Found at the WeeklyStandard.

Decline Is a Choice
The New Liberalism and the end of American ascendancy.
by Charles Krauthammer
From the October 19, 2009 issue
10/09/2009 12:00:00 AM