Oct 16 2009
This is such a stunning claim I have been hesitating to post on it, until the actual language in a treaty President Obama is planning to sign in December did indicate the creation of a new world government meant to use the fig leaf of mythical global warming to take control of the world’s energy markets. The source of this claim is disturbingly credible.
I’ll just cut to the chase here:
Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.
A detailed summary of Moncktonâ€™s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizenâ€™s focused attention.
Here were Moncktonâ€™s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:
At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think theyâ€™re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody wonâ€™t sign it.
I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word â€œgovernmentâ€ actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, â€œclimate debtâ€ â€“ because weâ€™ve been burning CO2 and they havenâ€™t. Weâ€™ve been screwing up the climate and they havenâ€™t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.
How many of you think that the word â€œelectionâ€ or â€œdemocracyâ€ or â€œvoteâ€ or â€œballotâ€ occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesnâ€™t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it â€“ Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. Heâ€™s going to sign it. Heâ€™ll sign anything. Heâ€™s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course heâ€™ll sign it.
Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Moncktonâ€™s assessment of the new entityâ€™s purpose:
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:
World Government (heading added)
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.
To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)
b) The Conventionâ€™s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, Â© a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.
With Enforcement Authority (heading added)
Â© The Conventionâ€™s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; Â© a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].
Emphasis from the original and very disturbing to say the least. The heavy use of misleading language (e.g., ‘windows’) is a sign that these people really don’t want the masses (or the Americans) to understand the true nature of this treaty. This is where that Cap & Tax money will be flowing, into this new world government run by some COP (whatever that is).
This is going to explode in Obama’s face.
Also posted at WUWT, where I am sure the comments will get lively.