<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Far Right Screws Up Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by casey0utcw</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-505318</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by casey0utcw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-505318</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by casey0utcw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by casey0utcw [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary1son</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-502656</link>
		<dc:creator>gary1son</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-502656</guid>
		<description>As I speculated above, it looks like Sarah Palin is probably the person most to &quot;blame&quot; for Dede&#039;s poor loser act.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Dede Scozzafava, the woman who has become the symbol of moderate Republicanism, is taking a shot at former Republican vice presidential hopeful Sarah Palin, the woman who has become the darling of the Republican Party&#039;s conservative grassroots.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

http://tinyurl.com/yfpqvoq

Because unlike Hannity and the rest, Sarah was the most &lt;i&gt;effective&lt;/i&gt; force taking her down.

She really does appear to hate Palin with a passion, and I suspect she was going to do whatever it took to deny her bragging rights.

Of course, she may be the type that would have turned coat no matter what the circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I speculated above, it looks like Sarah Palin is probably the person most to &#8220;blame&#8221; for Dede&#8217;s poor loser act.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Dede Scozzafava, the woman who has become the symbol of moderate Republicanism, is taking a shot at former Republican vice presidential hopeful Sarah Palin, the woman who has become the darling of the Republican Party&#8217;s conservative grassroots.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfpqvoq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfpqvoq</a></p>
<p>Because unlike Hannity and the rest, Sarah was the most <i>effective</i> force taking her down.</p>
<p>She really does appear to hate Palin with a passion, and I suspect she was going to do whatever it took to deny her bragging rights.</p>
<p>Of course, she may be the type that would have turned coat no matter what the circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; 2009 Elections Spell Disaster For Dems In 2010</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501790</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; 2009 Elections Spell Disaster For Dems In 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501790</guid>
		<description>[...] the big news may be in NY-23, where the Beck-Hannity candidate is about to be handed his head. I also predicted Owens would win if the far right went too far &#8211; and it looks like that also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the big news may be in NY-23, where the Beck-Hannity candidate is about to be handed his head. I also predicted Owens would win if the far right went too far &#8211; and it looks like that also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewEnglandDevil</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501565</link>
		<dc:creator>NewEnglandDevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501565</guid>
		<description>AJ: I disagree with you on how the far right screwed up. They didn&#039;t &quot;push&quot; DeDe in the Dem&#039;s hands. She was already there on all positions except gun control. There is a problem however btwn the national Republican party and the conservative base. The national party recognizes that keeping power and control in Washington enhances their power and prestige, whereas the base, by and large, would prefer a limited federal gov&#039;t that allowed &quot;big tent&quot; Republicanism at the local level. That, IMO, is where the real intra-party divide is occurring. So the &quot;far-right &quot; &quot;screwup&quot; has more to do with finding a way to bring the national leadership in line with the base so that &quot;screw-ups&quot; like nominating a &quot;big-tent&quot; Republican type from the local level to the national level without guaranteeing a commitment to smaller, less intrusive gov&#039;t and a commitment to federalism.

Here&#039;s my proposition for the Republican Party: At the federal level, all nominees must adhere to the following:
1) A commitment to the federalist form of gov&#039;t;
2) A commitment to a smaller federal gov&#039;t; and,
3) Candidates for President and Senate must agree on a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution, in order to hold the judiciary in check.

None of the social stuff at the federal level. The one place it could come into play is recognition of homosexual marriage.

This will leave one prominent group of the conservative base out (ostensibly) and that is single-issue pro-life voters who want a federal ban on abortion.

Most pro-lifers however, would recognize that leaving these issues to the states would allow for state abortion bans in most of the country. As to the rest, education, education, education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ: I disagree with you on how the far right screwed up. They didn&#8217;t &#8220;push&#8221; DeDe in the Dem&#8217;s hands. She was already there on all positions except gun control. There is a problem however btwn the national Republican party and the conservative base. The national party recognizes that keeping power and control in Washington enhances their power and prestige, whereas the base, by and large, would prefer a limited federal gov&#8217;t that allowed &#8220;big tent&#8221; Republicanism at the local level. That, IMO, is where the real intra-party divide is occurring. So the &#8220;far-right &#8221; &#8220;screwup&#8221; has more to do with finding a way to bring the national leadership in line with the base so that &#8220;screw-ups&#8221; like nominating a &#8220;big-tent&#8221; Republican type from the local level to the national level without guaranteeing a commitment to smaller, less intrusive gov&#8217;t and a commitment to federalism.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my proposition for the Republican Party: At the federal level, all nominees must adhere to the following:<br />
1) A commitment to the federalist form of gov&#8217;t;<br />
2) A commitment to a smaller federal gov&#8217;t; and,<br />
3) Candidates for President and Senate must agree on a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution, in order to hold the judiciary in check.</p>
<p>None of the social stuff at the federal level. The one place it could come into play is recognition of homosexual marriage.</p>
<p>This will leave one prominent group of the conservative base out (ostensibly) and that is single-issue pro-life voters who want a federal ban on abortion.</p>
<p>Most pro-lifers however, would recognize that leaving these issues to the states would allow for state abortion bans in most of the country. As to the rest, education, education, education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevevvs</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501536</link>
		<dc:creator>stevevvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501536</guid>
		<description>Toes192on 02 Nov 2009 at 2:46 pm

For instance, Stevevvsâ€¦ The Sperry File ref was interestingâ€¦ Keep it short and to the pointâ€¦

10-4 It seemed like they were all excellent.

Not one Moderate responded, telling...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toes192on 02 Nov 2009 at 2:46 pm</p>
<p>For instance, Stevevvsâ€¦ The Sperry File ref was interestingâ€¦ Keep it short and to the pointâ€¦</p>
<p>10-4 It seemed like they were all excellent.</p>
<p>Not one Moderate responded, telling&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevevvs</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501534</link>
		<dc:creator>stevevvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501534</guid>
		<description>Harold,

I play to win â€“ nice is for fools.

What will you win in Centrism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold,</p>
<p>I play to win â€“ nice is for fools.</p>
<p>What will you win in Centrism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toes192</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501394</link>
		<dc:creator>Toes192</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501394</guid>
		<description>For instance, Stevevvs... The Sperry File ref was interesting... Keep it short and to the point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For instance, Stevevvs&#8230; The Sperry File ref was interesting&#8230; Keep it short and to the point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toes192</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501392</link>
		<dc:creator>Toes192</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501392</guid>
		<description>Good grief... I think 2 or 3 Reagan quotes would make your point, Stevevvs.  Take a deep breath and restrict your comments to less than 200 words... But, wd on learning to copy/paste...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief&#8230; I think 2 or 3 Reagan quotes would make your point, Stevevvs.  Take a deep breath and restrict your comments to less than 200 words&#8230; But, wd on learning to copy/paste&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevevvs</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501374</link>
		<dc:creator>stevevvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501374</guid>
		<description>What do Centrist/Moderate/Bush/Conservatives Think of these quotes. Do they scare you away?

Man is not free unless government is limited.
Ronald Reagan

Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.
Ronald Reagan

Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.
Ronald Reagan

Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.
Ronald Reagan

Governmentâ€™s first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.
Ronald Reagan

Governmentâ€™s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan

Governments tend not to solve problems, only to rearrange them.
Ronald Reagan

History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.
Ronald Reagan

How do you tell a communist? Well, itâ€™s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? Itâ€™s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.
Ronald Reagan

Itâ€™s difficult to believe that people are still starving in this country because food isnâ€™t available.
Ronald Reagan

No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life weâ€™ll ever see on this earth!
Ronald Reagan

One way to make sure crime doesnâ€™t pay would be to let the government run it.
Ronald Reagan

Recession is when a neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours.
Ronald Reagan

The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would steal them away.
Ronald Reagan

The most terrifying words in the English language are: Iâ€™m from the government and Iâ€™m here to help.
Ronald Reagan

The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the problem is that government spends too much.
Ronald Reagan

The taxpayer â€“ thatâ€™s someone who works for the federal government but doesnâ€™t have to take the civil service examination.
Ronald Reagan

Thomas Jefferson once said, â€˜We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.â€™ And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying.
Ronald Reagan

To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I have just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the worldâ€™s strongest economy.
Ronald Reagan

Today, if you invent a better mousetrap, the government comes along with a better mouse.
Ronald Reagan

Trust, but verify.
Ronald Reagan

Unemployment insurance is a pre-paid vacation for freeloaders.
Ronald Reagan

We canâ€™t help everyone, but everyone can help someone.
Ronald Reagan

We have the duty to protect the life of an unborn child.
Ronald Reagan

We might come closer to balancing the Budget if all of us lived closer to the Commandments and the Golden Rule.
Ronald Reagan

We must reject the idea that every time a lawâ€™s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.
Ronald Reagan

We should measure welfareâ€™s success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.
Ronald Reagan

Welfareâ€™s purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.
Ronald Reagan

When you canâ€™t make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
Ronald Reagan

While I take inspiration from the past, like most Americans, I live for the future.
Ronald Reagan

Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.
Ronald Reagan

Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure.
Ronald Reagan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do Centrist/Moderate/Bush/Conservatives Think of these quotes. Do they scare you away?</p>
<p>Man is not free unless government is limited.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Government always finds a need for whatever money it gets.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Governmentâ€™s first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Governmentâ€™s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Governments tend not to solve problems, only to rearrange them.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>How do you tell a communist? Well, itâ€™s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? Itâ€™s someone who understands Marx and Lenin.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Itâ€™s difficult to believe that people are still starving in this country because food isnâ€™t available.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life weâ€™ll ever see on this earth!<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>One way to make sure crime doesnâ€™t pay would be to let the government run it.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Recession is when a neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would steal them away.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>The most terrifying words in the English language are: Iâ€™m from the government and Iâ€™m here to help.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the problem is that government spends too much.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>The taxpayer â€“ thatâ€™s someone who works for the federal government but doesnâ€™t have to take the civil service examination.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Thomas Jefferson once said, â€˜We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.â€™ And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I have just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the worldâ€™s strongest economy.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Today, if you invent a better mousetrap, the government comes along with a better mouse.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Trust, but verify.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Unemployment insurance is a pre-paid vacation for freeloaders.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>We canâ€™t help everyone, but everyone can help someone.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>We have the duty to protect the life of an unborn child.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>We might come closer to balancing the Budget if all of us lived closer to the Commandments and the Golden Rule.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>We must reject the idea that every time a lawâ€™s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>We should measure welfareâ€™s success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Welfareâ€™s purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>When you canâ€™t make them see the light, make them feel the heat.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>While I take inspiration from the past, like most Americans, I live for the future.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
<p>Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure.<br />
Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJStrata</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501371</link>
		<dc:creator>AJStrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501371</guid>
		<description>LOL!

Frogg, the conservatives WERE the bums thrown out just a year ago!

Sometimes it does take 2x4 across the forehead I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
<p>Frogg, the conservatives WERE the bums thrown out just a year ago!</p>
<p>Sometimes it does take 2&#215;4 across the forehead I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frogg1</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-3#comment-501370</link>
		<dc:creator>Frogg1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501370</guid>
		<description>I find this article very interesting, and it adds an alternative view to AJ&#039;s &quot;true conservative/purist&quot; arguement:

Doug Hoffman and &#039;The Canada Option&#039; 
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34221

Maybe the conservatives are just &quot;throwing the bums out&quot;.  Hey, it worked in Canada, didn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this article very interesting, and it adds an alternative view to AJ&#8217;s &#8220;true conservative/purist&#8221; arguement:</p>
<p>Doug Hoffman and &#8216;The Canada Option&#8217;<br />
<a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34221" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34221</a></p>
<p>Maybe the conservatives are just &#8220;throwing the bums out&#8221;.  Hey, it worked in Canada, didn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJStrata</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-2#comment-501369</link>
		<dc:creator>AJStrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501369</guid>
		<description>Stevevvs,

Your time here is nearly up. Take a hike for a while, or leave for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stevevvs,</p>
<p>Your time here is nearly up. Take a hike for a while, or leave for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevevvs</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-2#comment-501367</link>
		<dc:creator>stevevvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501367</guid>
		<description>What goes up, must come down, Spinnin wheel, got to go round.

AJ needs to move to Kansas. He&#039;s lost in the http://sperryfiles.com/corridor.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What goes up, must come down, Spinnin wheel, got to go round.</p>
<p>AJ needs to move to Kansas. He&#8217;s lost in the <a href="http://sperryfiles.com/corridor.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://sperryfiles.com/corridor.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redteam</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-2#comment-501363</link>
		<dc:creator>Redteam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501363</guid>
		<description>CP
&lt;i&gt;the problem is when you have someone on the left who wants to tax us out of existence and then get someone on the right who is running on a platform of, oh lets say, national outlawing of abortion&lt;/i&gt;

you&#039;re right, but the problem is, we really do have people such as Obama that wants to do the one, tax us out of existence, but we don&#039;t have people that want to do the other.  I don&#039;t know one politician who&#039;s no. 1 scheme is outlawing abortion.  I do know  one who&#039;s no. 1 scheme is to tax us out of existence.
Most national politicians accept that Roe v Wade will never be overturned.

AJ, those on the near right have to do a lot of nose holding also, for example to support McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CP<br />
<i>the problem is when you have someone on the left who wants to tax us out of existence and then get someone on the right who is running on a platform of, oh lets say, national outlawing of abortion</i></p>
<p>you&#8217;re right, but the problem is, we really do have people such as Obama that wants to do the one, tax us out of existence, but we don&#8217;t have people that want to do the other.  I don&#8217;t know one politician who&#8217;s no. 1 scheme is outlawing abortion.  I do know  one who&#8217;s no. 1 scheme is to tax us out of existence.<br />
Most national politicians accept that Roe v Wade will never be overturned.</p>
<p>AJ, those on the near right have to do a lot of nose holding also, for example to support McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frogg1</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11174/comment-page-2#comment-501362</link>
		<dc:creator>Frogg1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=11174#comment-501362</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve been reading, it appears Scozzofava was courted by the hightest ranking Dems (all the way to the White House)...and probably given some political payback promises for her support.   And, what is this I am hearing that Scozzofava&#039;s husband has been meeting with Dems about her switiching parties months ago????   Yep.....I think the conservative right saved the GOP on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve been reading, it appears Scozzofava was courted by the hightest ranking Dems (all the way to the White House)&#8230;and probably given some political payback promises for her support.   And, what is this I am hearing that Scozzofava&#8217;s husband has been meeting with Dems about her switiching parties months ago????   Yep&#8230;..I think the conservative right saved the GOP on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

