<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats In Full Retreat On NSA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Surber</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4394</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Surber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4394</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wednesday&#039;s Best&lt;/strong&gt;

Strata-Sphere: Democrats In Full Retreat On NSA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wednesday&#8217;s Best</strong></p>
<p>Strata-Sphere: Democrats In Full Retreat On NSA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Town Veteran</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4364</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Town Veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4364</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Democrats admit spying necessary&lt;/strong&gt;

Spying Necessary, Democrats SayBut Harman, Daschle Question President&#039;s Legal ReachBy Walter Pincus Two key Democrats yesterday called the NSA domestic surveillance program necessary for fighting terrorism but questioned whether President Bush had the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democrats admit spying necessary</strong></p>
<p>Spying Necessary, Democrats SayBut Harman, Daschle Question President&#8217;s Legal ReachBy Walter Pincus Two key Democrats yesterday called the NSA domestic surveillance program necessary for fighting terrorism but questioned whether President Bush had the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShrinkWrapped</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4357</link>
		<dc:creator>ShrinkWrapped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4357</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The NSA Spying Program: What is the Danger?&lt;/strong&gt;

As the Democrats back away from their noisy critique of the NSA wiretapping scandal it is instructive to look at what might have motivated them to raise the alarms. Dr. Sanity has an excellent summary of the Democrats climb-down, and</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The NSA Spying Program: What is the Danger?</strong></p>
<p>As the Democrats back away from their noisy critique of the NSA wiretapping scandal it is instructive to look at what might have motivated them to raise the alarms. Dr. Sanity has an excellent summary of the Democrats climb-down, and</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4356</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4356</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dems Retreating On NSA Case?&lt;/strong&gt;

Is the left beginning to back away from the NSA wiretapping non-scandal?  It sure seems like it.  AJ Strata has a great post up, as does Stop the ACLU, showing how Dems are starting to say &quot;it&#039;s ok to do this&quot; (gratned, with qualifiers).

I was wa...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dems Retreating On NSA Case?</strong></p>
<p>Is the left beginning to back away from the NSA wiretapping non-scandal?  It sure seems like it.  AJ Strata has a great post up, as does Stop the ACLU, showing how Dems are starting to say &#8220;it&#8217;s ok to do this&#8221; (gratned, with qualifiers).</p>
<p>I was wa&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrinkwrapped</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4354</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrinkwrapped</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4354</guid>
		<description>AJ,
One point about this whole &quot;scanda&quot;l that is rarely mentioned is that those who attack the President are also attacking a large group of civil servants, intel agents, et al, (numbering hundreds, perhaps thousands) who are actually doing the work.  The idea that Bush could abuse the NSA wiretaps for his own nefarious purposes and this would sneak past the radar of the MSM is laughable unless you suggest that all these people who are invovled in any way with the NSA program are in on the scam, and that seems ridiculous.  Naturally, I put together a post today addressing this in a bit more detail.
SW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ,<br />
One point about this whole &#8220;scanda&#8221;l that is rarely mentioned is that those who attack the President are also attacking a large group of civil servants, intel agents, et al, (numbering hundreds, perhaps thousands) who are actually doing the work.  The idea that Bush could abuse the NSA wiretaps for his own nefarious purposes and this would sneak past the radar of the MSM is laughable unless you suggest that all these people who are invovled in any way with the NSA program are in on the scam, and that seems ridiculous.  Naturally, I put together a post today addressing this in a bit more detail.<br />
SW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anchoress &#187; Dems pulling back from NSA bashing?</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4353</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anchoress &#187; Dems pulling back from NSA bashing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4353</guid>
		<description>[...] AJ Strata thinks so, as does Stop the ACLU.  At the same time, the Republican chairmen of the Senate and House intelligence committees â€” Sen. Pat Roberts (Kan.) and Rep. Peter Hoekstra (Mich.), who attended secret National Security Agency briefings â€” said they supported Bushâ€™s right to undertake the program without new congressional authorization. They added that Democrats briefed on the program, who included Harman and Daschle, could have taken steps if they believed the program was illegal. All four appeared on NBCâ€™s â€œMeet the Press.â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AJ Strata thinks so, as does Stop the ACLU.  At the same time, the Republican chairmen of the Senate and House intelligence committees â€” Sen. Pat Roberts (Kan.) and Rep. Peter Hoekstra (Mich.), who attended secret National Security Agency briefings â€” said they supported Bushâ€™s right to undertake the program without new congressional authorization. They added that Democrats briefed on the program, who included Harman and Daschle, could have taken steps if they believed the program was illegal. All four appeared on NBCâ€™s â€œMeet the Press.â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop The ACLU</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4347</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop The ACLU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4347</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Are Democrats Retreating on the NSA Issue?&lt;/strong&gt;

	Via Washington Post
	Two key Democrats yesterday called the NSA domestic surveillance program necessary for fighting terrorism but questioned whether President Bush had the legal authority to order it done without getting congressional approval.
	Rep....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are Democrats Retreating on the NSA Issue?</strong></p>
<p>	Via Washington Post<br />
	Two key Democrats yesterday called the NSA domestic surveillance program necessary for fighting terrorism but questioned whether President Bush had the legal authority to order it done without getting congressional approval.<br />
	Rep&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>Macmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Democrats would rather have votes than bitch&lt;/strong&gt;

AJ Strata details the retreat of Democrats on the NSA issue. As I said here as well, they don&#039;t want this fight. Just in the case &quot;God forbid&quot; that we are attacked, what would they say then. Yeah, they would try to shift blame on the President or Ch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Democrats would rather have votes than bitch</strong></p>
<p>AJ Strata details the retreat of Democrats on the NSA issue. As I said here as well, they don&#8217;t want this fight. Just in the case &#8220;God forbid&#8221; that we are attacked, what would they say then. Yeah, they would try to shift blame on the President or Ch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boris</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4340</link>
		<dc:creator>boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4340</guid>
		<description>Ghastly Dimwit sez: &quot;Who needs a snow shovel ??? A tablespoon works just fine&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ghastly Dimwit sez: &#8220;Who needs a snow shovel ??? A tablespoon works just fine&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJStrata</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4339</link>
		<dc:creator>AJStrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4339</guid>
		<description>Ghost,

Are simply not reading the links?  The FISA Court refused to issue warrants for leads here in the US discovered through the NSA&#039;s monitoring of overseas terrorists.  Forget about the gray-area examples of a terrorist in the US being monitored - FISA refused to consider warrants.  Even after 9-11 they refused to issue warrants if the only evidence was the NSA intercept of a conversation with a known terrorist.  A KNOWN terrorist.  Even if the were OPENINGLY planning an attack.  There was no 72 hour option because you cannot get independent evidence in 72 hours.

you wrote

&quot;Dubyaâ€™s end-run on the FISA Court added nothing to already exsisting capabilities.&quot;

naively thinking what FISA would do is sufficient.  It clearly is not.  In light of these revelations only a fool would say we can live with FISA.  They refused even the most obvious linkages based on the source of the information.  Not the content or accuracy or the potential impact.

Get a clue my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ghost,</p>
<p>Are simply not reading the links?  The FISA Court refused to issue warrants for leads here in the US discovered through the NSA&#8217;s monitoring of overseas terrorists.  Forget about the gray-area examples of a terrorist in the US being monitored &#8211; FISA refused to consider warrants.  Even after 9-11 they refused to issue warrants if the only evidence was the NSA intercept of a conversation with a known terrorist.  A KNOWN terrorist.  Even if the were OPENINGLY planning an attack.  There was no 72 hour option because you cannot get independent evidence in 72 hours.</p>
<p>you wrote</p>
<p>&#8220;Dubyaâ€™s end-run on the FISA Court added nothing to already exsisting capabilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>naively thinking what FISA would do is sufficient.  It clearly is not.  In light of these revelations only a fool would say we can live with FISA.  They refused even the most obvious linkages based on the source of the information.  Not the content or accuracy or the potential impact.</p>
<p>Get a clue my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost Dansing</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4338</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost Dansing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4338</guid>
		<description>Dubya&#039;s end-run on the FISA Court added nothing to already exsisting capabilities.

It has become fashionable to say that this controversy is about the always difficult problem of balancing civil liberties and national security.  However,  the issue is starker than that. The real issue is Dubya&#039;s  apparent belief - stoked at every opportunity by that zealot of zealots, Dick Cheney - that he can do just about anything he wants (mistreat prisoners, lock people up forever without filing charges), and justify it in the name of fighting terror.

&quot;There&#039;s an enemy out there,&quot; says Dubya.

That&#039;s also true. But this is not China or the old Soviet Union. The United States should be the one place on the planet where even a devastating terror strike by Al Qaeda is unable to shake the foundations of the government, which is grounded in the rule of law, the separation of powers and a constitution that guarantees the fundamental rights of the citizenry.

The public should be aware of two important points about the president&#039;s domestic spying program: it&#039;s illegal, and it&#039;s not catching terrorists.

If the program were legal, there is no chance so many Republicans would be upset about it. 

When Gonzalez was questioned about what the government was doing with all these terrorists that were being &quot;identified&quot; by the surveillance, he might just as well answered: &quot;Duh?&quot;

The fact is, not only is the whole thing illegal, it is totally ineffective and does not constitute any &quot;new&quot; capability that the NSA brings to the table...nothing that couldn&#039;t have been done through FISA or, at worst, a legislative modification to FISA.

Biden suggested that Al Qaeda operatives have most likely been aware for some time that the government is trying to intercept their phone calls.

Gonzales agreed. &quot;You would assume that the enemy is presuming that we are engaged in some kind of surveillance,&quot; he said. &quot;But if they&#039;re not reminded about it all the time in newspapers and in stories, they sometimes forget.&quot;

 Biden managed to laugh. Probably to keep from crying. This was the attorney general of the United States speaking, yet another straight man for an administration that has raised governing to new heights of witlessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dubya&#8217;s end-run on the FISA Court added nothing to already exsisting capabilities.</p>
<p>It has become fashionable to say that this controversy is about the always difficult problem of balancing civil liberties and national security.  However,  the issue is starker than that. The real issue is Dubya&#8217;s  apparent belief &#8211; stoked at every opportunity by that zealot of zealots, Dick Cheney &#8211; that he can do just about anything he wants (mistreat prisoners, lock people up forever without filing charges), and justify it in the name of fighting terror.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s an enemy out there,&#8221; says Dubya.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s also true. But this is not China or the old Soviet Union. The United States should be the one place on the planet where even a devastating terror strike by Al Qaeda is unable to shake the foundations of the government, which is grounded in the rule of law, the separation of powers and a constitution that guarantees the fundamental rights of the citizenry.</p>
<p>The public should be aware of two important points about the president&#8217;s domestic spying program: it&#8217;s illegal, and it&#8217;s not catching terrorists.</p>
<p>If the program were legal, there is no chance so many Republicans would be upset about it. </p>
<p>When Gonzalez was questioned about what the government was doing with all these terrorists that were being &#8220;identified&#8221; by the surveillance, he might just as well answered: &#8220;Duh?&#8221;</p>
<p>The fact is, not only is the whole thing illegal, it is totally ineffective and does not constitute any &#8220;new&#8221; capability that the NSA brings to the table&#8230;nothing that couldn&#8217;t have been done through FISA or, at worst, a legislative modification to FISA.</p>
<p>Biden suggested that Al Qaeda operatives have most likely been aware for some time that the government is trying to intercept their phone calls.</p>
<p>Gonzales agreed. &#8220;You would assume that the enemy is presuming that we are engaged in some kind of surveillance,&#8221; he said. &#8220;But if they&#8217;re not reminded about it all the time in newspapers and in stories, they sometimes forget.&#8221;</p>
<p> Biden managed to laugh. Probably to keep from crying. This was the attorney general of the United States speaking, yet another straight man for an administration that has raised governing to new heights of witlessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary mapes</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1329/comment-page-1#comment-4335</link>
		<dc:creator>mary mapes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=1329#comment-4335</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Republicans are trying to create a political issue&lt;/i&gt;

This is Pincus, frustrated yet again, he wasn&#039;t able to make it stick. Nice spin Walter.

Unfortunately, the DOJ investigation will continue, Sucks to be you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Republicans are trying to create a political issue</i></p>
<p>This is Pincus, frustrated yet again, he wasn&#8217;t able to make it stick. Nice spin Walter.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the DOJ investigation will continue, Sucks to be you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

