Nov 08 2011
Is Bialek A Woman Scorned?
I noticed something quite vicious Sharon Bialek said on TV recently, something which could be a signal that her motives are more vindictive than victim hood. Recall the timeline here:
- Sharon is working for National Restaurant Association (NRA) and loses job
- Cain is the head of NRA at the time – so Sharon goes DC to meet Cain and ask for help getting a job?? Folks, think this through. She goes over the head of the people who fired her in the first place to get a job with the top guy? What happens when he compares notes with the ones who fired her? In what universe does this make sense?
- Sharon flies to DC and corners the top guy of the company that fired her on the brilliantly stupid idea from her then boyfriend where supposedly she rebuffed his overtures. They meet for dinner, drinks and an evening drive – so she says.
But what if it was the other way around? What if she made a move on him in hopes of getting her job back? Now that sounds like an idea a dumb boyfriend or girlfriend might cook up! What if she thought she could seduce her job back (or at least try some black mail – no pun intended).
What if the one doing the rebuffing was the straight laced Cain?
Here’s Sharon’s line that triggered this train of thought:
“You know what I want to say to Herman is? If not for yourself, okay, to come forward and admit this — what is his wife going through? You know, that’s who I feel for the most in this whole thing,” Bialek said on CNN’s “American Morning.”
Sorry, but I am calling B*ll Sh*t on you Sharon! If you were concerned about his wife you would have kept your mouth shut like you did for 14 years (supposedly). And if you really did care about her, you would never have mentioned her n this at all. You wanted the media lens on her.
This has all the signs and sounds of vengeance. Sharon wants Gloria Cain to hurt, because she wants Herman Cain to hurt, because he ran the company that fired her ass! This drips with anger and meanness.
Now this makes much more sense than the story she’s weaving. Cain would not wine, dine or provide a suite to someone his company just fired! No way – not if they had good reason to fire her (like she royally screwed up or did something unethical). When fired that usually means never to be seen again.
What I hear is a fantasy from Allred and Bialek, one that has been running around Sharon’s little head for a while now. One that involves a plan to get back at ‘the man’. I bet Cain did not even give her the time of day in DC, just like he blew her off at the Tea Party event a few weeks ago. She is a woman scorned.
Now that makes a lot more sense – while were playing fiction anyway.
It is definitely reeking of BULLS***T!! All of these unfounded allegations that have been kept quiet for almost 15 years are obviously a ploy by the left. It just cements for the voters that Cain is the guy that we need to be in the White House to assist us with taking back our country!
I have been looking at a lot of what has been surfacing about this woman including her press conference and several of her tv visits and the just concluded Cain news conference on this matter.
All of the many facts that have been documented about this woman tend to cast doubt on her judgment and wisdom. It also goes to her potential credibility.
Also I note that 3 NRA employees and her as a ex employee have made claims in the short 2 years Cain was associated with the NRA.
That gets compared to his record of about 40 years at many other large organizations.
I just find the timing of all this too cute by half and at best it is a he said she said.
I am open to hearing facts that could weigh in on this issue.
It was an excellent press conference and he took a lot of questions. And, even if he does not remember her…..now Allred is going to trot out the picture of him standing next to her at the Tea Party Conference (or where ever that pic was taken) and it will bite him.
I know he takes thousands of pictures every month on the campaign trail and doesn’t remember any of those people….but, Allred will accuse him of lying and show picture proof. It will be a replay of the Nicki IRS letter with Meg Whitman’s writing on it.
Also, the one paid accuser, Kraushaar, now says that since her name has been outed she will probably come forward with a press conference to spill the details. That’s the one that works for Obama now, right? And, possibly has a relative working for Politico? And, by the way, was conveniently outed by her brother in law? She says she may do a group press conference with his other accusers or something.
This just looks like it is being orchestrated.
Cain should have a group of woman he has worked with in the past twice as big give a press conference right after that to give accounts of his integrity and respectful treatment towards women.
He does have a very good attorney representing him on this “court of public opinion” character assassination. His attorney did an excellent job.
It’s not over yet.
I was in class all day. Can you bring me up to speed on Cain’s attorney and what he did today?
After Sharon has been discredited, I now wonder how many more TV shows she will be on tomorrow, Thursday, and Friday…Anyone know?
If Cain puts a stop to it and people still support him, then the precedent will be stopped.
Romney’s comments made today are unprofessional.
Here it is:
Ms. Kraushaar, a spokeswoman at the Treasury Department, said in an interview that she was upset that her name had leaked into some press reports. But she said that she had decided to speak out now that her identity was publicly known. …
She said she did not know whether or how she might tell more of her story but said that she had been warming “to the idea of a joint press conference where all of the women would be together with our attorneys and all of this evidence would be considered together.”
She said of Mr. Cain: “These allegations can be considered together as a body of evidence.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/282630/another-cain-accuser-speaks-out-katrina-trinko
Wow. Cain’s attorneys had better prepare themselves to file a lawsuit against all of them or something like that. Can a public speaker file a lawsuit against him?
Merlin does have a good point.
i think Cain handled the press conference very well today. He stuck with the issue, that He did not do anything, the accusations are not true. He didn’t spend any time attacking the accusers. That is for others to do.
The accuser should always stick with the truth, not the tactic of ‘accusing the accuser’. You don’t accuse a woman that has been raped of being a slut. You just say, it wasn’t you.
The termites will continue to come out of the woodwork, it’s going to be relentless.
Many will believe it, many will not. Newt will end up with the nomination.
correction above, should have read:
The accused should always stick with the truth,
Lurker, you really need to watch the video (includes attorney):
Full Video – Watch Herman Cain press conference over sexual harassment allegations
http://www.therightscoop.com/5pm-watch-live-herman-cain-press-conference/
I’m sure more ont he attorney will come out later. What I remember the Fox panel saying is that he is a high powered attorney from Georgia which indicates Cain is taking this seriously. From a recent politico article:
“Cain was introduced by Lin Wood, an Atlanta attorney with his own stable of celebrity clients, including wrongly accused 1996 Olympics bomber Richard Jewell, the parents of JonBenet Ramsey and former Rep. Gary Condit.”
Oh my gosh. This lawyer is going after these ladies big time. Thanks for the link, Frogg1.
Herman Cain just announced that he’s very close to achieving the goal of 999,000 for the Iowa fund. It went up really fast today. Amazing.
Now it’s up to him to fight this whole thing. Good thing that he now has a very good lawyer. He must really hate Gloria Allred. LOL!
[…] Also read Strata-Sphere […]
I have no idea where mac ranger got this stuff but he did work as a spy of some sort and maintains close relationships with the intelligence community. Mac also says that we are about to find out who spilled the beans.
http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2011/11/08/according-to-the-investigation-conducted-by-nra-kraushaars-accusations-were-unfounded/
According to two former employees of the NRA who have knowledge of the sexual harassment allegation by Karen Kraushaar, as well as the subsequent investigation by the NRA told me that the allegations were found to be “totally unsubstantiated”.
In fact the language is “specifically disparaging” of Kraushaar in the report. It’s reported that the $45,000 she received was in fact a severance pay.
All of these pop-up allegations tell us – those with any sense – that this is has been carefully orchestrated and in planning for weeks before it was brought to light. The Question now is just who is behind it.
We’re about to find that out.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/veteran-anchor-bill-kurtis-says-bialek-was-former-cbs-employee-with-a-track-record-hers-and-cains-roles-may-even-have-been-reversed-in-car/
On his radio program Tuesday, Mark Levin aired a clip of veteran journalist and CBS anchor Bill Kurtis on WLS saying that Herman Cain’s accuser, Sharon Bialek, is a former CBS employee with a “track record.” Given her checkered past, a chuckling Kurtis posited that Bialek‘s and Cain’s roles in the alleged car-incident would even have been reversed.
Some of Kurtis’ observations on Bialek were as follows:
“She has a history.”
“There is a lot more to this story.”
“I can assure you that there will be far more to this story.”
“Let’s put Herman or Sharon in the car and say their roles may even have been reversed, given her track record here.”
Bialek worked for CBS radio station WCKG from 2006-2007.
Levin brings up a point worth considering: Why is this story not making its rounds in the mainstream media, and why are voices like Kurtis’ being confined to select talk radio stations? Kurtis’ segment aired on Monday and thus far, precious few news outlets are delving into Bialek’s questionable history.
I understand that Mark Block misattributed Josh Kraushaar as Karen’s brother.
Now they’re saying that Cain should get rid of Mark Block.
Harumph….
I see that Big Government is pushing for a “late candidate” that could sweep the GOP nomination. HHHmmm…I’d entertain this “late candidate”.
Lurker, Mac Ranger’s post was interesting indeed. I always found him credible; but, I didn’t know he had spy connections. Didn’t he stop writing about political stuff over the past year to get back to his high tech love? I guess this stuff was just too much for him pass over. The reference to “the report” reminded me of another article I read when the politico article first came out about a Georgia politician (state level I think) saying that Cain assured them “a report” would soon come out to vindicate him. Wonder if this is what he was talking about?
Wow! Cain got the best of the best.
Herman Cain’s powerful attorney: L. Lin Wood
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/herman-cains-powerful-attorney-l-lin-wood/2011/11/08/gIQASVqS3M_blog.html
When asked why he had chosen to represent Cain, Wood cited the media circus.
“I have spent many years representing clients who have seen their reputations and lives destroyed by false accusations in the media,” Wood wrote in an e-mail message to The Post Tuesday evening. “I believe that Herman Cain has been unfairly put on trial in the court of public opinion based on reports from unknown or anonymous sources, rumor, speculation and inherently improbable statements by the most recent accuser.”
With Wood’s hiring, Cain has a powerful ally on his side. A partner with Wood Hernacki & Evans LLC, Wood has a three-decade-long career prosecuting, and defending, celebrity clients, sometimes winning mega-settlements on their behalf. He is a fierce advocate.
Democrats lost another US House seat tonight as Republican Rob Cornilles takes Oregon District 1 in a special election over Democrat Suzanne Bonamici.
Mississippi for the first time since reconstruction has a Republican legislature AND governor.
Another state the Democrats have lost. Mississippi also approved a voter identification law.
[…] media may try to squeeze more out of this, but parading a few women with probable axes to grind against Cain is not going to hold anyone’s attention.Update: As I wrote this post guess what hit Drudge: A […]
[…] A sober analysis of Sharon Bialek’s claims quickly exposed a real possibility that Bialek was trying to get vengeance against the man whose organization fired her: […]