<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberal Contortions To Avoid Blame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista On Current Events</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-2#comment-14498</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista On Current Events</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 16:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14498</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fighting the War Against the War...&lt;/strong&gt;

Source The Strata-Sphere viaWatcher
Journalists Rank amateurs playing the intel......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fighting the War Against the War&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Source The Strata-Sphere viaWatcher<br />
Journalists Rank amateurs playing the intel&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14307</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14307</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council...&lt;/strong&gt;

As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here. Here&#8217;s what ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As you may know the members of the Watcher&#8217;s Council each nominate one of his or her own posts and one non-Council post for consideration by the whole Council. The complete list of this week&#8217;s Council nominations is here. Here&#8217;s what &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14291</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14291</guid>
		<description>The idea that we should prosecute the Times sounds good.  Trouble is, where are we going to find a jury where not one of the twelve suffers from Bush Derangement Syndrome?
 It only takes one juror to hang a jury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that we should prosecute the Times sounds good.  Trouble is, where are we going to find a jury where not one of the twelve suffers from Bush Derangement Syndrome?<br />
 It only takes one juror to hang a jury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaaZ</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14290</link>
		<dc:creator>DaaZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14290</guid>
		<description>Look, all terrorists are a bunch of brainwashed retards who believe children stories and are incapable of self-expressed ideas. Stop giving luncatic followers of failed ideologies more credit than they deserve for killing as many people as cancer kills every day.

You have more chances of being killed by lightning than even coming within 500 miles of a terrorist act. There are rapists, murderers, psychopaths and lunatics of all sorts in all societies and throughout the history of mankind. They&#039;re just flies waiting to be squashed, a bunch of children with pistols compared to any organized army. There are easily over a thousand problems more pressing than those retards. 

Stop being so terrorized for you precious little person all the time. There&#039;s nothing more between bin Laden and Ted Kaczynski than a vast ocean. Get on with your lives, you&#039;re wasting it being scared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, all terrorists are a bunch of brainwashed retards who believe children stories and are incapable of self-expressed ideas. Stop giving luncatic followers of failed ideologies more credit than they deserve for killing as many people as cancer kills every day.</p>
<p>You have more chances of being killed by lightning than even coming within 500 miles of a terrorist act. There are rapists, murderers, psychopaths and lunatics of all sorts in all societies and throughout the history of mankind. They&#8217;re just flies waiting to be squashed, a bunch of children with pistols compared to any organized army. There are easily over a thousand problems more pressing than those retards. </p>
<p>Stop being so terrorized for you precious little person all the time. There&#8217;s nothing more between bin Laden and Ted Kaczynski than a vast ocean. Get on with your lives, you&#8217;re wasting it being scared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14289</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 23:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14289</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Which people has the media gotten killed?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

One might say from that instance in Lebanon, they could well have gotten our Marines there killed.  Here is what people fail to understand:
Sure, it is reasonable to expect that we would be ATTEMPTING to intercept communitcations, but an enemy never knows how successful we might be at it.   If you are exposing that we have been intercepting diplomatic traffic the enemy might know that all that traffic takes a single path or uses a single cable someplace and so they switch to some different means of communications.  We might not have access to the new route the communications are taking.  It could take us years to gain access again.  Or they might change how it is encrypted. 

Same with Osama&#039;s satellite phone.  We could have nabbed him long ago if the Washington Post hadn&#039;t told him that we were monitoring his phone.  He has since stopped using satelling phones.  How many people have died as a result of allowing Osama to remain at large?  Hard to know.

Finding a particular individual is very difficult.  We have fugatives on our most wanted list right here in this country that are difficult for the FBI to find.  When you are able to gain access to a communications channel used by someone you are looking for, it is more valuable than gold.  When you lose access to that channel, you might never find it again.

Some people have what I consider to be an asinine vision of our intelligence community and think we can just waive a magic wand and find anyone we want instantly.  Apparently our media thinks there is nothing wrong with exposing an intercept program.  It is quite possible we could have been tipped off about about the Beirut bombing.  We will never know.

I also believe our media has assisted current terrorist groups and have prolonged the war in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Which people has the media gotten killed?
</p></blockquote>
<p>One might say from that instance in Lebanon, they could well have gotten our Marines there killed.  Here is what people fail to understand:<br />
Sure, it is reasonable to expect that we would be ATTEMPTING to intercept communitcations, but an enemy never knows how successful we might be at it.   If you are exposing that we have been intercepting diplomatic traffic the enemy might know that all that traffic takes a single path or uses a single cable someplace and so they switch to some different means of communications.  We might not have access to the new route the communications are taking.  It could take us years to gain access again.  Or they might change how it is encrypted. </p>
<p>Same with Osama&#8217;s satellite phone.  We could have nabbed him long ago if the Washington Post hadn&#8217;t told him that we were monitoring his phone.  He has since stopped using satelling phones.  How many people have died as a result of allowing Osama to remain at large?  Hard to know.</p>
<p>Finding a particular individual is very difficult.  We have fugatives on our most wanted list right here in this country that are difficult for the FBI to find.  When you are able to gain access to a communications channel used by someone you are looking for, it is more valuable than gold.  When you lose access to that channel, you might never find it again.</p>
<p>Some people have what I consider to be an asinine vision of our intelligence community and think we can just waive a magic wand and find anyone we want instantly.  Apparently our media thinks there is nothing wrong with exposing an intercept program.  It is quite possible we could have been tipped off about about the Beirut bombing.  We will never know.</p>
<p>I also believe our media has assisted current terrorist groups and have prolonged the war in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgvet58</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14276</link>
		<dc:creator>cgvet58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14276</guid>
		<description>morning, all... and a hearty HAPPY BIRTHDAY, AMERICA!!!!

in regards to these spineless suckers of valuable oxygen that infest 43rd street and other media locales...

They are arrogant, self-anointed and unelected.  If you haven&#039;t yet, listen to the podcast stream from the powerline link.  

At every junction, the meme exhibited by the leftists on the panel is very self-centered:
 - presuming the Constitution protects &quot;them&quot; (press) and not a whisper that it protects &quot;free speech&quot;, 
 - conflating likely damage caused by these leaks with non-related events, 
 - turning this criticism of their treason into a whining &quot;everytime-we-speak-the-evil-administration-wants-to-hurt-us&quot; drone... 

And they&#039;re soooo smooth about it, always offering their responses in such a reasoned way,  soothing, grammatically correct and sophisticated utterings are these... I can see where dhimmicrats, leftists and other let-the-government-run-my-life types can cozily follow these &quot;elites&quot; right over the cliffs - like the true lemmings they are.

Many valuable points in this wonderful strata-gram and in the comments - we need to remember that Journalists are wordsmiths, nothing more or less.  They are not experts at anything, really... they&#039;re just good at oscillating between baffling us with bullshit on the one hand, and blinding us with (their self-anointed, oh-look-at-me...) brilliance on the other.

The day when they reap what they sow cannot come soon enough for me.

CGVet58
(USN 1976-1984, USCG 1984-2000, LTjg Retired)

God has granted us Freedom, we owe Him our Courage in return</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>morning, all&#8230; and a hearty HAPPY BIRTHDAY, AMERICA!!!!</p>
<p>in regards to these spineless suckers of valuable oxygen that infest 43rd street and other media locales&#8230;</p>
<p>They are arrogant, self-anointed and unelected.  If you haven&#8217;t yet, listen to the podcast stream from the powerline link.  </p>
<p>At every junction, the meme exhibited by the leftists on the panel is very self-centered:<br />
 &#8211; presuming the Constitution protects &#8220;them&#8221; (press) and not a whisper that it protects &#8220;free speech&#8221;,<br />
 &#8211; conflating likely damage caused by these leaks with non-related events,<br />
 &#8211; turning this criticism of their treason into a whining &#8220;everytime-we-speak-the-evil-administration-wants-to-hurt-us&#8221; drone&#8230; </p>
<p>And they&#8217;re soooo smooth about it, always offering their responses in such a reasoned way,  soothing, grammatically correct and sophisticated utterings are these&#8230; I can see where dhimmicrats, leftists and other let-the-government-run-my-life types can cozily follow these &#8220;elites&#8221; right over the cliffs &#8211; like the true lemmings they are.</p>
<p>Many valuable points in this wonderful strata-gram and in the comments &#8211; we need to remember that Journalists are wordsmiths, nothing more or less.  They are not experts at anything, really&#8230; they&#8217;re just good at oscillating between baffling us with bullshit on the one hand, and blinding us with (their self-anointed, oh-look-at-me&#8230;) brilliance on the other.</p>
<p>The day when they reap what they sow cannot come soon enough for me.</p>
<p>CGVet58<br />
(USN 1976-1984, USCG 1984-2000, LTjg Retired)</p>
<p>God has granted us Freedom, we owe Him our Courage in return</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathyedits</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14269</link>
		<dc:creator>kathyedits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 03:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14269</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The media now has a self documented history of getting people killed by exposing details they did not understand, or appreciate the implications surrounding these details.&lt;/i&gt;

Which people has the media gotten killed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The media now has a self documented history of getting people killed by exposing details they did not understand, or appreciate the implications surrounding these details.</i></p>
<p>Which people has the media gotten killed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisPer</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14263</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisPer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14263</guid>
		<description>Its time we recognised it and acted appropriately: ideas kill.

Bad ideas are killing innocents all the time.  Not just Pol Pot&#039;s ideas, but general ideas that nice people have.

For instance, why did we have all those &#039;going postal&#039; massacres? Those school shootings?  Copycat crimes, like copycat suicides, that should have been prevented by responsible reporters.  The knowledge was there, but the scoop-driven sensationalist media culture drove reporting frenzies every time.  Want ten million bucks of free publicity and worldwide name recognition?  Look at Lee Harvey Oswald.  Look at Thomas Hamilton (Dunblane), and watch &#039;A Curretn Affair&#039;.

Bad ideas, badly misguided ideas, drive our media culture.  Maybe its time the people took an interest in preventing the next unnecessary massacre whether by foreign terrorist or domestic idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its time we recognised it and acted appropriately: ideas kill.</p>
<p>Bad ideas are killing innocents all the time.  Not just Pol Pot&#8217;s ideas, but general ideas that nice people have.</p>
<p>For instance, why did we have all those &#8216;going postal&#8217; massacres? Those school shootings?  Copycat crimes, like copycat suicides, that should have been prevented by responsible reporters.  The knowledge was there, but the scoop-driven sensationalist media culture drove reporting frenzies every time.  Want ten million bucks of free publicity and worldwide name recognition?  Look at Lee Harvey Oswald.  Look at Thomas Hamilton (Dunblane), and watch &#8216;A Curretn Affair&#8217;.</p>
<p>Bad ideas, badly misguided ideas, drive our media culture.  Maybe its time the people took an interest in preventing the next unnecessary massacre whether by foreign terrorist or domestic idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14259</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14259</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;If the NYTimes had been around in 1775 &#8230;...&lt;/strong&gt;

&#8230; these headlines are what you would have been reading.
Sad - but true.
On a related note, make sure to check out Thomas Sowell&#8217;s piece on the NYT&#8217;s revelation of how the US gov&#8217;t has gone about tracking financial transactions o...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If the NYTimes had been around in 1775 &#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230; these headlines are what you would have been reading.<br />
Sad &#8211; but true.<br />
On a related note, make sure to check out Thomas Sowell&#8217;s piece on the NYT&#8217;s revelation of how the US gov&#8217;t has gone about tracking financial transactions o&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For Enforcement</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14258</link>
		<dc:creator>For Enforcement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14258</guid>
		<description>Her example was the disclosure, after the bombing of the American embassy in Beirut in 1983, that American intelligence was reading coded radio traffic between terrorist plotters in Syria and their overseers in Iran. The communications stopped, and five months later they struck again, destroying the Marine barracks in Beirut and killing 241 Americans.

â€œThis kind of result, albeit unintentional, points up the necessity for full cooperation wherever possible between the media and the authorities,â€ Ms. Graham said.

â€œThis kind of result, albeit unintentional,

Well just let me say, I don&#039;t think it is unintentional or intentional, I think it is &quot;damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.&quot;  As in this here &#039;scoop&#039; is worth it if all we do is lose a few American troops.  I really think the NY Times and WaPo hate American and the military and do whatever it can to do it harm or make it look bad.  Are they traitors, A resounding&#039; Hell yeah&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her example was the disclosure, after the bombing of the American embassy in Beirut in 1983, that American intelligence was reading coded radio traffic between terrorist plotters in Syria and their overseers in Iran. The communications stopped, and five months later they struck again, destroying the Marine barracks in Beirut and killing 241 Americans.</p>
<p>â€œThis kind of result, albeit unintentional, points up the necessity for full cooperation wherever possible between the media and the authorities,â€ Ms. Graham said.</p>
<p>â€œThis kind of result, albeit unintentional,</p>
<p>Well just let me say, I don&#8217;t think it is unintentional or intentional, I think it is &#8220;damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.&#8221;  As in this here &#8216;scoop&#8217; is worth it if all we do is lose a few American troops.  I really think the NY Times and WaPo hate American and the military and do whatever it can to do it harm or make it look bad.  Are they traitors, A resounding&#8217; Hell yeah&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OLDPUPPYMAX</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14255</link>
		<dc:creator>OLDPUPPYMAX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14255</guid>
		<description>A lib female reporter suggested in a Sunday interview that the US was &quot;forcing&quot; other nations to participate in the SWIFT program. Nothing could more accurately reveal the attitude these people have. The US, being obviously evil, is forcing the rest of the world to the dark side.  It would never cross this clowns mind that much of the world shares our goal for the spread of democracy and the defeat of murderous nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lib female reporter suggested in a Sunday interview that the US was &#8220;forcing&#8221; other nations to participate in the SWIFT program. Nothing could more accurately reveal the attitude these people have. The US, being obviously evil, is forcing the rest of the world to the dark side.  It would never cross this clowns mind that much of the world shares our goal for the spread of democracy and the defeat of murderous nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14251</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14251</guid>
		<description>Since the Vietnam era, I believe there has been a perception by many in the media that disclosures of this sort increase their standing as guardians of the public interest.  I also believe that the pendulum is now swinging in the other direction where in increasing number of the public now see this as counter to the public interest and even dangerous on a very personal level.  

It is going to take some time to get through the heads of journalists that these actions are not appreciated.  Their first step, a patronizing attempt at &quot;educating&quot; the public on why they think it is important and their condescending &quot;justifications&quot; for doing it, is to be expected.  It is the same response we get from somone caught with their hands in a cookie jar they have been free to go into for a long time.  So far their response has been &quot;it&#039;s what we do&quot;, &quot;they already know&quot;, and &quot;according to our calculations, the risk should be minimal&quot;.  Well, I don&#039;t want the NYT increasing the risk of terrorist attacks on my community (and when I say community, I mean all my fellow Americans here in the US and abroad) at all, even minimally so. Because in this case the risk is infinately greater than the benefit.  The benefit from the most recent stories is pretty much zero. 

When you do a risk/benefit analysis, you want the benefit to be greater than the risk.  Stated as a ratio or a division problem, you want the result to be less than 1.  In this case, the result is infinity as we have published something that could cause future risk for absolutely no benefit whatsoever to the American public.

The professional journalism trade is living in a bygone era.  Their decisions reflect a mindset of the 1960&#039;s and early 70&#039;s.  Our society has changed, they have failed to keep up.  If they don&#039;t act as responsible citizens, I fear that the citizens will be forced to impose restrictions that might not be the best for anyone in the long term.  The journalists are at risk of strangling themselves by abusing rights entrusted to them.   In the long term, the marketplace will decide but that is a slow process.

When people are demonstrating outside the NY Times instead of outside the Pentagon and the NYT tries to pass it off as simply a great misunderstanding, some kind of failure to communicate, I will hope it comes to their minds how completely the tables have turned.  I believe we are witnessing a fundamental sea change of a real grass roots uprising against an institution that has gone too far.  Looking at modern polls that show the trust by the people of various institutions in this country, they might wish to take note that the positions of the media and the military are probably 180-degrees from where they were in 1970.  People trust the military and distrust the media.  They should be learning something from that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Vietnam era, I believe there has been a perception by many in the media that disclosures of this sort increase their standing as guardians of the public interest.  I also believe that the pendulum is now swinging in the other direction where in increasing number of the public now see this as counter to the public interest and even dangerous on a very personal level.  </p>
<p>It is going to take some time to get through the heads of journalists that these actions are not appreciated.  Their first step, a patronizing attempt at &#8220;educating&#8221; the public on why they think it is important and their condescending &#8220;justifications&#8221; for doing it, is to be expected.  It is the same response we get from somone caught with their hands in a cookie jar they have been free to go into for a long time.  So far their response has been &#8220;it&#8217;s what we do&#8221;, &#8220;they already know&#8221;, and &#8220;according to our calculations, the risk should be minimal&#8221;.  Well, I don&#8217;t want the NYT increasing the risk of terrorist attacks on my community (and when I say community, I mean all my fellow Americans here in the US and abroad) at all, even minimally so. Because in this case the risk is infinately greater than the benefit.  The benefit from the most recent stories is pretty much zero. </p>
<p>When you do a risk/benefit analysis, you want the benefit to be greater than the risk.  Stated as a ratio or a division problem, you want the result to be less than 1.  In this case, the result is infinity as we have published something that could cause future risk for absolutely no benefit whatsoever to the American public.</p>
<p>The professional journalism trade is living in a bygone era.  Their decisions reflect a mindset of the 1960&#8242;s and early 70&#8242;s.  Our society has changed, they have failed to keep up.  If they don&#8217;t act as responsible citizens, I fear that the citizens will be forced to impose restrictions that might not be the best for anyone in the long term.  The journalists are at risk of strangling themselves by abusing rights entrusted to them.   In the long term, the marketplace will decide but that is a slow process.</p>
<p>When people are demonstrating outside the NY Times instead of outside the Pentagon and the NYT tries to pass it off as simply a great misunderstanding, some kind of failure to communicate, I will hope it comes to their minds how completely the tables have turned.  I believe we are witnessing a fundamental sea change of a real grass roots uprising against an institution that has gone too far.  Looking at modern polls that show the trust by the people of various institutions in this country, they might wish to take note that the positions of the media and the military are probably 180-degrees from where they were in 1970.  People trust the military and distrust the media.  They should be learning something from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol johnson</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14249</link>
		<dc:creator>carol johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14249</guid>
		<description>Has anyone heard the tape that&#039;s over at Powerline yet?  I must admit I haven&#039;t heard this before, but if you want to check it out here&#039;s the link:

&quot;It is important for everyone to realize, I think, how low the level of discourse in the legacy media has fallen. So: listen and weep.&quot;

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014584.php

.....

I seriously don&#039;t know how these people sleep at night.  They give themselves the right and obligation to tell us what they think we need to know regardless of how much danger it puts us in.  Its REALLY scary that there are people who are actually PROUD of this &quot;truth to power&quot; crap.   It&#039;s high time we spoke TRUTH TO POWERLESS!

Carol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone heard the tape that&#8217;s over at Powerline yet?  I must admit I haven&#8217;t heard this before, but if you want to check it out here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p>&#8220;It is important for everyone to realize, I think, how low the level of discourse in the legacy media has fallen. So: listen and weep.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014584.php" rel="nofollow">http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014584.php</a></p>
<p>&#8230;..</p>
<p>I seriously don&#8217;t know how these people sleep at night.  They give themselves the right and obligation to tell us what they think we need to know regardless of how much danger it puts us in.  Its REALLY scary that there are people who are actually PROUD of this &#8220;truth to power&#8221; crap.   It&#8217;s high time we spoke TRUTH TO POWERLESS!</p>
<p>Carol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overtaken by Events</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14247</link>
		<dc:creator>Overtaken by Events</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14247</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On Our Unassailable Media...&lt;/strong&gt;

Maybe printing stuff that &quot;everyone knows about already&quot; isn&#039;t such a good idea after all. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On Our Unassailable Media&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Maybe printing stuff that &#8220;everyone knows about already&#8221; isn&#8217;t such a good idea after all. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074/comment-page-1#comment-14246</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2074#comment-14246</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Loose Lips Indeed...&lt;/strong&gt;

Buried in a post defending the Mainstream Media&#039;s right to publish sensitive information, the New York Times (free reg. required) lets a particularly nasty cat out of the bag.  That negligent reporting can, and HAS, gotten people killed in the past an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Loose Lips Indeed&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Buried in a post defending the Mainstream Media&#8217;s right to publish sensitive information, the New York Times (free reg. required) lets a particularly nasty cat out of the bag.  That negligent reporting can, and HAS, gotten people killed in the past an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

