Jul 28 2006
If You Can Kill Children, What’s Wrong With Making Them Cry?
The policy of indifference to human suffering and death (as seen by the left’s push to kill fetuses and leave millions under the brutal dictatorship of the Hussien clan) demonstrates its poison on humanity in many forms. Michelle Malkin has uncovered a woman who makes children suffer so she can use their suffering to make money. Heck, scientists want to kill children at a much younger stage for spare parts, radical feminists want the right to kill children for convenience, and Saddam wanted the right to kill children for political power. Why is it surprising this woman cannot fathom her crime for making money of the pain she inflicts? The left is a sick group sometimes. What I want to know besides when this monster will be arrested for child abuse, is what kind of whacked out parent allows this to happen to their child? Where they paid for this? This makes child labor look quaint in comparison.
Other than saying she (the photgrapher) was “unhappy with the current social and political situation” where is this left wing label coming from? Malkin and her ilk automatically label all wierdos as liberals, conservatives have their share as well, Ann Coulter comes to mind. This particular nut case’s pictures have nothing to do with her political affiliation whatever that might actually be, but yet somehow it gets spun that way.
sdmoderate,
“Other than saying she (the photgrapher) was “unhappy with the current social and political situation†where is this left wing label coming from?”
If you can’t make that connection, you must struggle understanding a lot of things.
The Left often uses the arts to deceive. Witness Al Gore’s movie on global warming concerning which he allowed that exaggeration was a legitimate way to get attention. Or Michael Moore’s tour de force which made elaborate use of deception.
AJ made a telling point of the Left’s lack of concern for the suffering of the very young and indeed of all but themselves.
The Macker,
Where are you coming up with this???? This incident isn’t political, it’s basically child abuse, she wasn’t trying to make a political statement like in your Michael Moore and Al Gore references. Given your logic Ann Coulter is a liberal as well because she uses exaggeration as a way to get attention for her and her books.
sdmoderate
If you had read the entire Malkin piece, you would have no doubt about this woman’s political agenda. The photographer admitted that she had a political agenda.