Comments on: If You Can Kill Children, What’s Wrong With Making Them Cry?

By: Barbara

Barbara — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 04:36:44 +0000

sdmoderate

If you had read the entire Malkin piece, you would have no doubt about this woman’s political agenda. The photographer admitted that she had a political agenda.

By: sdmoderate

sdmoderate — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 02:36:03 +0000

The Macker,

Where are you coming up with this???? This incident isn’t political, it’s basically child abuse, she wasn’t trying to make a political statement like in your Michael Moore and Al Gore references. Given your logic Ann Coulter is a liberal as well because she uses exaggeration as a way to get attention for her and her books.

By: The Macker

The Macker — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 02:18:09 +0000

sdmoderate,
“Other than saying she (the photgrapher) was â€œunhappy with the current social and political situationâ€ where is this left wing label coming from?”
If you can’t make that connection, you must struggle understanding a lot of things.

The Left often uses the arts to deceive. Witness Al Gore’s movie on global warming concerning which he allowed that exaggeration was a legitimate way to get attention. Or Michael Moore’s tour de force which made elaborate use of deception.

AJ made a telling point of the Left’s lack of concern for the suffering of the very young and indeed of all but themselves.

By: sdmoderate

sdmoderate — Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:18:41 +0000

Other than saying she (the photgrapher) was “unhappy with the current social and political situation” where is this left wing label coming from? Malkin and her ilk automatically label all wierdos as liberals, conservatives have their share as well, Ann Coulter comes to mind. This particular nut case’s pictures have nothing to do with her political affiliation whatever that might actually be, but yet somehow it gets spun that way.