Aug 31 2006

National Security Over Impeachment

Published by at 9:18 am under 2006 Elections,All General Discussions

More polling data showing the country moving from “get Bushitler” to “protect this nation from terrorists”:

59 percent approved of President Bush’s response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks while less than half in New York and Washington felt that way.

35 percent nationally were worried they’d be victims of terrorism, a number that spiked to 43 after the alleged terrorist plot in Britain was announced.

Its simple. Impeaching Bush willl not appease or stop terrorists. In fact it will probably motivate them. And closing down leads from the NSA to the FBI may protect our discussions with Bin Laden, but it won’t stop is suicidal army of jihadists. Conyers and Reid and Peliosi want to repeal the Patriot Act so people will be able to read what they want in Libraries – but it will not help identify and foil attacks. None of this should be a surprise. The only surprise is taking the liberal media and the dems so long to see the consequences of their myopic actions.

5 responses so far

5 Responses to “National Security Over Impeachment”

  1. lurker9876 says:

    “Conyers and Reid and Peliosi want to repeal the Patriot Act so people will be able to read what they want in Libraries.”

    I thought that this was what was one of the things that they fought for as a modification to the current Patriot Act. They wanted to make sure that those library records were protected under the Patriot Act.

    If this is the case, then their inconsistency is so funny.

  2. DubiousD says:

    According to Powerline, the Patriot Act contains no such language permitting the tracking of books checked out of libraries. Later Congress amended the PA to make this point even clearer: the tracking of books loaned to patrons shall not be permitted.

  3. lurker9876 says:

    Was this added to the second version of the Patriot Act?


  4. Barbara says:

    It is hard to realize that half of New York City does not understand that they personally would be the target for the next terrorist attack. You would think they would turn over every stone to keep themselves safe, but their BDS is so strong it trumps survival. Do they really think that the democrats will keep them safe? Not likely. The democrats will be too busy accumulating power and money for themselves and their friends to bother about terrorist attacks. They would probably say if Bush had not been so aggresive on the GWOT, they would not be having this problem. Yes, that’s the ticket. Blame Bush. Why not? Everybody on the left is doing that anyway.This is the mantra of people who bury their heads in the sand.

  5. pull says:

    I think they have two main motives… on one hand, they are cowards… on the other they hate what is good about the free world. That is, they are evil.