<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Damning Bin Laden Footage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnboyltd</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465/comment-page-1#comment-17307</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnboyltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465#comment-17307</guid>
		<description>Inresting and quite funny threatening a TV network. Just when you think they have IQ&#039;s lower than a snakes belly , they move the goal post down! 
Incidentally the creation of the Gorelick wall occurred after the first WTC bombing. I have often thought that Gorelick should have been cross examined as to the reasons for increasing the wall at this time. I suspect that Iraq had something to do with the first one and the Clintons didn&#039;t want any evidence of that or they would have to go to war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inresting and quite funny threatening a TV network. Just when you think they have IQ&#8217;s lower than a snakes belly , they move the goal post down!<br />
Incidentally the creation of the Gorelick wall occurred after the first WTC bombing. I have often thought that Gorelick should have been cross examined as to the reasons for increasing the wall at this time. I suspect that Iraq had something to do with the first one and the Clintons didn&#8217;t want any evidence of that or they would have to go to war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pull</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465/comment-page-1#comment-17289</link>
		<dc:creator>pull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465#comment-17289</guid>
		<description>I hope the debate does rage on and Clinton and crew do get exposed for what they did.

I do not have a lot of confidence here, however. They have not been exposed since 9/11 for this way. We all know... all of us... the Democrats are anti-defense. We all know what this means. Why can&#039;t we slam them on this?

One of the biggest horrible things the Clinton Administration did was ignoring Rwanda. The excellent movie &quot;Hotel Rwanda&quot; - unlike the book it was largely based on - throws the blame off on the US in general. Not the Clinton Administration. And the book itself is clearly non-partisan.

Nobody has done this since, either. It is not a secret. We really didn&#039;t have to do anything to help out Rwanda. It was a machete war. The refugees of the country ended up fixing the problem. A few bullets to take down a single radio station and the genocide would have been over.

Rwanda isn&#039;t our problem but genocide is and we knew it was genocide at the time. Europe didn&#039;t help either and they had closer ties. But, we didn&#039;t have to shout out to the world, &quot;We do not think it is a genocide&quot; and other such inanities. We actually caused the UN to refuse to send in help according to the book &quot;Stories from Rwanda&quot; which the movie is based on. Albright did that personally.

So, if that kind of thing isn&#039;t talked about in the mainstream press... I really don&#039;t see how this kind of thing would be. 

I can only hope, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the debate does rage on and Clinton and crew do get exposed for what they did.</p>
<p>I do not have a lot of confidence here, however. They have not been exposed since 9/11 for this way. We all know&#8230; all of us&#8230; the Democrats are anti-defense. We all know what this means. Why can&#8217;t we slam them on this?</p>
<p>One of the biggest horrible things the Clinton Administration did was ignoring Rwanda. The excellent movie &#8220;Hotel Rwanda&#8221; &#8211; unlike the book it was largely based on &#8211; throws the blame off on the US in general. Not the Clinton Administration. And the book itself is clearly non-partisan.</p>
<p>Nobody has done this since, either. It is not a secret. We really didn&#8217;t have to do anything to help out Rwanda. It was a machete war. The refugees of the country ended up fixing the problem. A few bullets to take down a single radio station and the genocide would have been over.</p>
<p>Rwanda isn&#8217;t our problem but genocide is and we knew it was genocide at the time. Europe didn&#8217;t help either and they had closer ties. But, we didn&#8217;t have to shout out to the world, &#8220;We do not think it is a genocide&#8221; and other such inanities. We actually caused the UN to refuse to send in help according to the book &#8220;Stories from Rwanda&#8221; which the movie is based on. Albright did that personally.</p>
<p>So, if that kind of thing isn&#8217;t talked about in the mainstream press&#8230; I really don&#8217;t see how this kind of thing would be. </p>
<p>I can only hope, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465/comment-page-1#comment-17284</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2465#comment-17284</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Osama In The Crosshairs...&lt;/strong&gt;

There it is again, something the libs cannot refute as much as they would like to, the fact that the Clinton Administration treated Osama and the war on terror as if it was a police operation.  There was no war to them, it was all a law enforcement mat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Osama In The Crosshairs&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There it is again, something the libs cannot refute as much as they would like to, the fact that the Clinton Administration treated Osama and the war on terror as if it was a police operation.  There was no war to them, it was all a law enforcement mat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

