<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Path To 9-11, Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitty Litter</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17626</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitty Litter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17626</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SEPTEMBER 11, 2006...&lt;/strong&gt;

AJ Strata says First off, well done. Â… Looking forward to part II. It is a really good story, but most of America is probably missing much of the nuance....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SEPTEMBER 11, 2006&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>AJ Strata says First off, well done. Â… Looking forward to part II. It is a really good story, but most of America is probably missing much of the nuance&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick neid</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17617</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick neid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17617</guid>
		<description>for a longer more complete review of the clinton failures 1993-2000 

http://tinyurl.com/nww97

this is an audio link for the ten times he missed ole bin

http://tinyurl.com/h6m4m

and this is the comparison video of the edits to the movie

http://tinyurl.com/kr3un

i think the dems went ballistic in their opposition to the series because if nothing else,  after the first part,  i was left with the thought, thank god bush, cheney, rumsfeld et al have been in the white house these last six years with two more to follow...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for a longer more complete review of the clinton failures 1993-2000 </p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/nww97" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nww97</a></p>
<p>this is an audio link for the ten times he missed ole bin</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/h6m4m" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/h6m4m</a></p>
<p>and this is the comparison video of the edits to the movie</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/kr3un" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/kr3un</a></p>
<p>i think the dems went ballistic in their opposition to the series because if nothing else,  after the first part,  i was left with the thought, thank god bush, cheney, rumsfeld et al have been in the white house these last six years with two more to follow&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luc</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17611</link>
		<dc:creator>luc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17611</guid>
		<description>I agree with AJâ€™s take on the movie.

Where I think that this movie does the most damage is not in its negative portrayal of Clinton, because it is not really negative, and not in leaving you with the impression that the MAIN PREOCCUPATION of practically everybody involved in national security were POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS.

Obviously mistakes were made and wrong decisions were taken but I think that most people would understand that, as tragic as the results of these mistakes were, humans are not perfect no matter how high a position in government they reach. I think, though, that where this movie is going to have a large impact is in bringing forth that there is NO DIFFERENCE in approach, with respect to national security especially when dealing with terrorism, BETWEEN THE PAST AND CLEARLY FAILED CLINTON ADMINISTRATION AND THE CURRENT DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

If I am correct this will have a huge impact on the upcoming elections: If you do not like what was done in the run-up to 9/11 then you better not elect Democrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with AJâ€™s take on the movie.</p>
<p>Where I think that this movie does the most damage is not in its negative portrayal of Clinton, because it is not really negative, and not in leaving you with the impression that the MAIN PREOCCUPATION of practically everybody involved in national security were POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS.</p>
<p>Obviously mistakes were made and wrong decisions were taken but I think that most people would understand that, as tragic as the results of these mistakes were, humans are not perfect no matter how high a position in government they reach. I think, though, that where this movie is going to have a large impact is in bringing forth that there is NO DIFFERENCE in approach, with respect to national security especially when dealing with terrorism, BETWEEN THE PAST AND CLEARLY FAILED CLINTON ADMINISTRATION AND THE CURRENT DEMOCRATIC PARTY.</p>
<p>If I am correct this will have a huge impact on the upcoming elections: If you do not like what was done in the run-up to 9/11 then you better not elect Democrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thespis Journal</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17610</link>
		<dc:creator>Thespis Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17610</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Outrage of the Week...&lt;/strong&gt;

ABC News presented a special edition of &quot;Nightline&quot; last night to bash the Bush administration after presenting the failures of the Clinton administration in the docu-drama &quot;The Path tyo 9-11.&quot; As I sat and watched in amazement, I realized the mast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Outrage of the Week&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ABC News presented a special edition of &#8220;Nightline&#8221; last night to bash the Bush administration after presenting the failures of the Clinton administration in the docu-drama &#8220;The Path tyo 9-11.&#8221; As I sat and watched in amazement, I realized the mast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retired Spook</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17603</link>
		<dc:creator>Retired Spook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17603</guid>
		<description>I purposely set my DVDR to record both parts because I want to watch it after I&#039;ve seen, heard and read the various reactions to it.  Plus I&#039;ll probably watch it more than once.  I&#039;ve bookmarked links to the clips that were made available on the Web over the weekend to compare with the finished product.  It wasn&#039;t practical to watch them on my dial-up connection, but I&#039;m finally getting DSL on Thursday.  I imagine this will be the topic de jour in the Blogosphere for quite a while.  The few comments here have already been very instructive.

TERRYE, as for you comment about going easy on the Clintons, my guess is that, if changes were made to mollify them at the last  minute, more people will know what they were than if the Clintons had just kept quiet in the first place.  I realize only a small percentage of the population reads blogs, but Limbaugh&#039;s program reaches close to 10% of the population, and you know he&#039;s going to do an extensive analysis.  Word of mouth will take it from there.  Plus the more the Left protests, the worse they&#039;re going to look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purposely set my DVDR to record both parts because I want to watch it after I&#8217;ve seen, heard and read the various reactions to it.  Plus I&#8217;ll probably watch it more than once.  I&#8217;ve bookmarked links to the clips that were made available on the Web over the weekend to compare with the finished product.  It wasn&#8217;t practical to watch them on my dial-up connection, but I&#8217;m finally getting DSL on Thursday.  I imagine this will be the topic de jour in the Blogosphere for quite a while.  The few comments here have already been very instructive.</p>
<p>TERRYE, as for you comment about going easy on the Clintons, my guess is that, if changes were made to mollify them at the last  minute, more people will know what they were than if the Clintons had just kept quiet in the first place.  I realize only a small percentage of the population reads blogs, but Limbaugh&#8217;s program reaches close to 10% of the population, and you know he&#8217;s going to do an extensive analysis.  Word of mouth will take it from there.  Plus the more the Left protests, the worse they&#8217;re going to look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17601</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17601</guid>
		<description>I thought it was pretty good. They left out a few attacks and I thought there was supposed to be some stuff in there about Clinton&#039;s preoccupation with Iraq, but other than that I thought the film was pretty easy on the Clinton people. After seeing it I really don&#039;t know what the problem was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was pretty good. They left out a few attacks and I thought there was supposed to be some stuff in there about Clinton&#8217;s preoccupation with Iraq, but other than that I thought the film was pretty easy on the Clinton people. After seeing it I really don&#8217;t know what the problem was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MerlinOS2</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17592</link>
		<dc:creator>MerlinOS2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17592</guid>
		<description>I saw a couple of places where editing was done compared to some of the uncut clips available on the net before the broadcast.

Also the movie portrayed one of the basic inconsistancies that the Clinton agenda about OBL never quite jelled with me.

Clinton supposedly always considered it a criminal v a military problem.

How does that square with first having a snatch team on steroids (that evidently wasn&#039;t pre approved to finish the job) followed up by a cruise missle strike.

To put assets in place at risk without either pre approval fully or at least having authorized decision makers in the loop is to say the least a big duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a couple of places where editing was done compared to some of the uncut clips available on the net before the broadcast.</p>
<p>Also the movie portrayed one of the basic inconsistancies that the Clinton agenda about OBL never quite jelled with me.</p>
<p>Clinton supposedly always considered it a criminal v a military problem.</p>
<p>How does that square with first having a snatch team on steroids (that evidently wasn&#8217;t pre approved to finish the job) followed up by a cruise missle strike.</p>
<p>To put assets in place at risk without either pre approval fully or at least having authorized decision makers in the loop is to say the least a big duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pull</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476/comment-page-1#comment-17587</link>
		<dc:creator>pull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2476#comment-17587</guid>
		<description>I have just finished the first half of the first half and love it. (We have tivo&#039;d it, of course.)

I saw right away why the Left hated this! Heh heh... wow. This is no Farenheit 9/11. This is not a Syriana. This is filled with facts... and while a docudrama, it hits on what is really important for the American people to know. 

Because it strains to tell the truth, real important facts are brought out to the people at almost every juncture. 

From one of the first scenes where they have the terrorists blowing up the WTC tower in the first attack... it is excellent. It shows how they were anxious to get out of the parking lot. And it zero&#039;d in on the pretty, young, pregnant guard. The Left must have dropped their jaw at that. No way would they want that kind of thing shown to the people.

And that is just from one of the first scenes. 

What I don&#039;t get is what has happened to our society that we haven&#039;t had an expose like this since 9/11. We have Oliver Stone&#039;s film where &quot;Muslim&quot; is not even mentioned. We have Farenheit 9/11 whose main point is that &quot;Bush sucks&quot; and is full of crazy lies. We have 9/11 conspiracy theory films... 

Very, very sad.

I hope a lot of people are watching this to finally get some kind of clue as to the real issues going on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just finished the first half of the first half and love it. (We have tivo&#8217;d it, of course.)</p>
<p>I saw right away why the Left hated this! Heh heh&#8230; wow. This is no Farenheit 9/11. This is not a Syriana. This is filled with facts&#8230; and while a docudrama, it hits on what is really important for the American people to know. </p>
<p>Because it strains to tell the truth, real important facts are brought out to the people at almost every juncture. </p>
<p>From one of the first scenes where they have the terrorists blowing up the WTC tower in the first attack&#8230; it is excellent. It shows how they were anxious to get out of the parking lot. And it zero&#8217;d in on the pretty, young, pregnant guard. The Left must have dropped their jaw at that. No way would they want that kind of thing shown to the people.</p>
<p>And that is just from one of the first scenes. </p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t get is what has happened to our society that we haven&#8217;t had an expose like this since 9/11. We have Oliver Stone&#8217;s film where &#8220;Muslim&#8221; is not even mentioned. We have Farenheit 9/11 whose main point is that &#8220;Bush sucks&#8221; and is full of crazy lies. We have 9/11 conspiracy theory films&#8230; </p>
<p>Very, very sad.</p>
<p>I hope a lot of people are watching this to finally get some kind of clue as to the real issues going on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

