Comments on: The Clinton Meltdown, The Democrat Meltdown

By: patrick neid

patrick neid — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:12:29 +0000

Terrye,

i always thought of it as Clinton network news in the 90′s.

i’m always amazed at the ignorance of politicians who forget that video and internet search engines exist. within two hours of clinton’s performance blogger’s of all stripes completely debunked every statement of the fondler in chief.

here’s just two……a trip down memory lane……..ammo !

http://tinyurl.com/e68vs

http://tinyurl.com/r95kq

By: MerlinOS2

MerlinOS2 — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:00:46 +0000

Terrye

You are correct and For Enforcement hit it on the nail.

Despite Billy boys spin over all these years, there is a lot of dirt in the water.

Perhaps he is reacting so pointedly is that he has gotten a heads up of Justice Department investigations into all the leaks.

Sometimes reactions precede reality..the stock market reacts that way.

By: MerlinOS2

MerlinOS2 — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:47:49 +0000

Ken

You are posting later and later in threads, do you have to get your talking points together?

You always post about about some nebulous alternative choice.

Not that is has any concept in reality, just that it is an alternate.

Please bring us facts, evidence or at least a realistic assumption.

You are all smoke and mirrors, but you can’t seem to grasp that.

What a shame.

By: owl

owl — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:14:23 +0000

The more I have thought about what I watched, there is only one big important thing that we better do something to counteract. What he said at the end.

Did everyone really hear him? After throwing a tantrum and only being asked about a FEW attacks, he boiled it all down to the election. This man had gall enough to say rightwingers/Bush/Rove were selling “fear”. He does not believe in confronting our threats. Not even now.

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:43:23 +0000

The left’s ideals have failed but no more so than Bush’s ideal of spreading pro-American, pro-Israel governments to the Middle East.
AJ, did not Clinton claim the Republicans clamor for exiting Somalia too? If so, and true, your omission of it in your post sure kept its momentum going.

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:28:12 +0000

AJ, did not Clinton say the Republicans clamored for getting out of Somalia,too? If so and true, it kind of slows the momentum of your post. The “left’s” ideals have failed about as much as Bush’s plan of spreading pro-American, pro-Israel “democracies” to the Middle East.

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:25:08 +0000

Yes Strata, what you call the Left ideals have failed but no more so than Bush’s failed unnecessary war (polls verify agreement on both scores with me here) and his failure to bring “democracy” ( pro-American, pro-Israel governments to do our bidding) to the Middle East as he vowed.

And if I’m not mistaken , Clinton said the Republicans clamored for
getting out of Somalia too. Why do you omit this, if true? Kind of
undermines the momentum of your post…

By: Retired Spook

Retired Spook — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:07:10 +0000

I know this is a little crude, but it's too classic not to post.

By: Retired Spook

Retired Spook — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:53:24 +0000

Well, I think this picture says it all. And, of course, this picture says about all you need to know about der Schleikmeister.

By: For Enforcement

For Enforcement — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:34:54 +0000

here it is:

http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/11/98110602_nlt.html

By: For Enforcement

For Enforcement — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:33:00 +0000

Over on Tammy Bruce blog, she has a link to the indictment of Bin Laden in 1998 that had all those things listed,
And he didn’t know about him. hmmmm

By: Terrye

Terrye — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:41:28 +0000

I just wathced the interview. My God, that was awful. I have never seen anything like it.

By: jeanneb

jeanneb — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:21:20 +0000

AJ,
In your list of attacks that occurred on Clinton’s watch (“WTC 1, two embassy bombings and the USS Cole”), you left out 3 biggies.

Khobar Towers – and Louis Freeh’s frustration at having the FBI investigation suppressed by Clinton’s administration.

Bojinka– Ramsi Yousef’s plan to blow up 12 American planes over the
Pacific (not to mention the young man who was actually killed in the trial run).

And the millinium attack on LAX that was thwarted by an alert border guard (though the Clintonistas are desperate to convince us it was his terror policies that did the job).

That makes SEVEN major attacks or planned attacks on Clinton’s watch. Yet he still believed we didn’t have enough evidence to go after bin Laden.

Makes one seriously wonder if he (or any other Dem) would ever have the cajones to adopt the pre-emption doctrine. Also makes one really wonder what was in those docs that disappeared down Sandy Berger’s pants.

By: For Enforcement

For Enforcement — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:02:51 +0000

The Democrats have ALWAYS been soft on America’s enemies, even WWII when everybody thought FDR did such a great job. He is the reason all of Eastern Europe lived under communist domination for 50 years. It’s not so much that they are FOR our enemies, it’s just that they either don’t take it seriously or just think if we will be nice to them, they won’t mess with us. Anyhow, hindsight is 20-20, so Clinton may have some grounds for not recogizing who the enemy was, but after all the incidents, he should’ve at least known there was one.

By: Kaz-Man

Kaz-Man — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 19:41:31 +0000

There weren’t many of us who did take the threats from a rat in a shithole like Afghanistan seriously enough. We were all too busy watching the Nasdaq soar and Clinton battling the “Vast Right-Wing conspiracy” inside the beltway.
His gig on Fox today was a missed opportunity, to say the least. If he just admitted his missteps in the context of his era, I think Wallace would have been more than willing to move on to other topics. I don’t think Wallace was going to follow-up with more questions. It turned out he didn’t need to have any. Clinton wanted to extend his rant. That was a big mistake. Or a political miscalculation. Maybe he wanted to score points with the nutroots by attacking Fox News directly.
I think we all just witnessed the final nail in the coffin of Hilary’s candidacy for ’08. Who the hell wants to put that lunatic back in the White House?