my point is you lied and misquoted someone to make a point. typical neolib tactic.

What she said was bad enough, but for you to lie and put it into an entirely different context just is a display of your inherent dishonesty.

Let Jacque know he’s in like company.

“In 1996 then-UN Ambassador Madeleine Albright was asked by 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl, in reference to years of U.S.-led economic sanctions against Iraq, “We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that is more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?”

To which Ambassador Albright responded, “I think that is a very hard choice, but the price, we think, the price is worth it.” ”

Now I’m certainly not a fan of Ambass. Albright, but us Conservatives don’t have to resort to lying to try to prove a point.
As you neolibs do.

Give our regards to Jacque.

Let me point out that you are blatently dishonest with that statement.
There is no way you can get those words from her actual quote. She, in fact, did not say:that killing Iraqi children by the tens of thousands was “worth it” and if you think she did, cut and paste her exact quote here.
This is typical of neolibs, re-phrase a statement to what you wish she had said and then quote her as saying it. Totally dishonest. Why am I not surprised.

Give Jacque our regards.

Can Snapple show a quote where he opposed the killings by Saddam during the long period when he was America’s ally and sanctioned by Rumsfeld to attack Iran?

And Snapple has me confused with Republican April Glaspie who told
Saddam America did not care if he invaded Kuwait.

Tutti continuavano ad aspettare un dirty trick di Karl Rove in vista delle elezioni di novembre. Ma questa volta la “sorpresa” potrebbe fare molto male ai Repubblicani. Un deputato della Florida, Mark Foley, si è dovuto dimettere dopo che l’FBI ha …

Notice how clinton dissed the sexual harrassment issue. He had a certain form of sex with an intern while he was being sued for sexual harrassment. ..we have a long row to hoe with terrorists….and the clintonistas.

I am praying for the survival of those who see the truth of these two.

We will again see what the American people are made of….in November. I hope they have “wised up” since ’92 and ’96.

He even hates Madeline Albright, probably because she supported the U. N. sanctions.

Ken doesn’t mind when Saddam kills hundreds of thousands of his own people.

Ken doesn’t mind when Saddam attacks his neighbors.

Ken doesn’t mind when Iraqi agents make trouble in other countries–even in America.

It’s no secret that the American Indian Movement was getting “substantial contributions” from the genocidal Saddam for its anti-American activities until some idiot AIMster queered the deal by praising Ayatollah Khomeni during the Iran-Iraq war.

http://legendofpineridge.blogspot.com/2006/09/surprise-wardo-is-for-sale-not-that.html

Greeting there in France.

The last living judge of Nuremberg opined that under int’l law Bush should be prosecuted for war crimes. “After Downing Street” memos
shows British intelligence Chief Dearlove was quite aware that Bush and his team cherrypicked intelligence to effectualize an already decided invasion of Iraq. afterdowningsteet.com.

Some honor.

Foley is but one example of Americana the Islamic world is trying to
keep out of their domains. Even formerly moderate/secular Turkey
grows creepingly Islamic, witnessing the effects of American intrusion where not desired.

NOTHING clears Foley(and I’m not saying you were trying to defend him) There is no excuse for what he did. It may not have technically been illegal, but he sue needs medical help anyhow.

You married your wife when she was 16? Well I guess that makes you a craddle robber too. But if you are still together after 46 years then you obviously knew what you were doing. How many people can say that?

Before I was aware of the Instant Messages, and had seen just a couple of the e-mails, I bought into the “no there there” view and I’m not an easy sell. It looked as though Foley was using a personal touch to be well-thought-of politically (“Oh, yeah, he’s a real people person, nice guy, and not full of himself like most of ‘em”), by doing a personal follow-up when former pages requested a recommendation.

That explained the request for a photo, age, how they liked the Page Program, etc., all SOP file information when a recommendation is requested and sent out. A bit too chatty maybe, but that seemed like just a style thing, and an adult trying to sound as though he “relates.” Nothing over the edge.

If, as it appears, that’s all the House leadership was aware of, it doesn’t look as though anyone other than Foley on the Republican side was remiss. My own take at seeing the one kid’s comment about (the e-mails) being “creepy,” I thought was an overreaction, and likely that the kid had found a Democrat willing to make it worth his while to make a mountain from a molehill.

The Leadership warning to “cut out the e-mails” seemed appropriate and sufficient, based on the available information. It’s highly doubtful that any of the Republican members had an inkling about the other messages, if for no other reason than their own political instincts and self-interest.

If we all recognized immediately that this may well be the death knell of GOP majority, it’s a certain bet that wouldn’t have escaped any of the GOP House members. Even if not one of them gave a rat’s patoot about the pages and their welfare, they sure as the devil wouldn’t have crossed their fingers for a year hoping no Dems got a whiff of it, every one of them would know with certainty it was a bomb waiting to explode … and, it did. Self preservation alone would have demanded knocking Foley out a year ago, and having a replacement serve out the term who would’ve been in place for this election.

And that, together with the swift howls of indignation from the left, suggests there likely were Democrats aware of the real nature of those messages, who were biding their time until just under the wire for maximum political benefit.

That’s probably because she was 22.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Lewinsky