I suspected as much, which is why I simply asked in th e most respectful way I knew how. Don’t beat yourself up over it. If I am not happy, it will be abundantly clear! Just use quotation marks if you are offering up speculation on what others might be ‘thinking’ so there is no doubt it is not your thoughts coming through.

Cheers, AJStrata

I was not name calling. I am sorry if it sounded that way. I will be plainer.

I meant that is what the kids might have been doing. They are young and often times the young are thoughtless. That is not true for all of them ofcourse, but it is like the guys who make fun of the shy girl or the chubby kid. It might have been to them that is was just a hoax, making fun of a gay guy to make themselves feel cool.

sorry if I was too blunt.

Please watch the name calling!

Thanks.

And the good doctor has a point. Did the email from the page complaining about Foley come before or after Alexander switched parties? Didn’t the email get sent around the time of Katrina? Alexander had already switched parties by then hadn’t he?

This is gonna hurt the Dems if this can get out. Concealing what might be a crime is a criminal offense in and of itself.

I think it is absolutely disgusting and low life to be involved in “outing’ of anyone for political gain, whether Republican or Democrat. These are real people and they have real loved ones, family, friends and coworkers. The idea of a homosexual liason is creepy to me, but the many gays and lesbians I’ve known over my sixty plus years are not creeps, but lovely people who work hard, are loyal friends, and generally live their lives very much as I do and everyone else does. I’m sure there are lots of things that heterosexuals do in their own sex lives that would also seem creepy to me and that is why I would just as soon not know about what should remain private between two consenting people.

http://www.frontpagemag.com

CREW and the FBI are butting heads. Soros was on O’Reilly and denied that he had any knowledge that his money was funding CREW, but he said he doesn’t know what others do with his money.

“Soros and Foley” (10-9-06)

Here’s a press release we sent out today:
A leftist group with strong ties to the Democratic Party and to radical
billionaire George Soros may have engaged in criminal obstruction of
justice in the Foley case. FBI investigators have accused the group
CREW of concealing evidence of Rep. Mark Foley’s sexual misconduct over a period of several months.

George Soros’ Open Society Institute contributed $100,000 to CREW in January 2006.

“CREW is little more than a front for George Soros’ Shadow Party,”
charges David Horowitz. “CREW has been withholding this evidence for months, apparently in order to release it just before the election. It is well known that Soros keeps a tight rein on groups that he funds.
He and his Shadow Party cannot evade responsibility for CREW’s actions.”

The Shadow Party is a network of private political groups, organized
and led by George Soros, which exerts a powerful but hidden influence over the Democratic Party, according to Horowitz.

The workings of this network are described in the newly-released New York Times bestseller THE SHADOW PARTY: HOW GEORGE SOROS, HILLARY CLINTON AND SIXTIES RADICALS SIEZED CONTROL OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, by David Horowitz and Richard Poe (Thomas Nelson, 2006).

At a press conference on Monday, October 2, CREW announced that it had been holding incriminating e-mails revealing Foley’s sexual misconduct since at least July 2006. CREW said it turned these e-mails over to the FBI in July, but the FBI failed to act.

The FBI counters that CREW provided only edited versions of the
e-mails, and refused to surrender the unedited originals.
Investigators say that CREW refuses to divulge where it got the
e-mails, and may have been holding them since at least April 2006 –
months before CREW alerted the FBI of their existence.

In response, CREW has accused the FBI of lying, thus pitting George
Soros’ Shadow Party against America’s top federal law enforcement agency, in a head-on confrontation.