Oct 20 2006
Invisibility Cloaks Are Old News
The AP thinks they have stumbled over something new – invisibility cloaks. Check out this post from Oct 2005.
Oct 20 2006
Published by AJStrata at 1:26 pm under All General Discussions
The AP thinks they have stumbled over something new – invisibility cloaks. Check out this post from Oct 2005.
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« Apr | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 | 31 |
WordPress Theme Shop | Web Hosting GeeksThe Strata-Sphere Copyright © 2024 All Rights Reserved .
AJ, this is off topic but I would appreciate if you let your readers know that Border Patrol Officers Ramos and Compean were sentenced yesterday to 11 and 12 years in federal prison for doing their jobs to protect the American people from Mexican drug runners.
So it seems that you can aid a convicted terrorists and it only warrents a two and half year sentence, but let law enforcement (BP) go after a drug runner who is bringing poison that will wind up in the hands of our children and they are the ones who will go to jail.
This sentence is a travesty and sends a clear message to all law enforcement officers who do their jobs every day for little pay; don’t expect your government to back you.
So while two brave Border Patrol agents will go to jail for what was no more than a procedural error that other agents were also guilty of, the drug runner continues to be busted again for his crimes but because of the immunity granted to him by the prosecution against Ramos and Compean, the drug runner could not be arrested.
Every American should be on the phone to their congressman demanding a federal investigation into this trial and why the jury foreman told the jury that the judge would not accept a hung jury so they had to find the plaintiff’s guilty.
Slashdot.org has some good comments on this and the need to match the shielding material to the wave link .
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/19/1725243&threshold=1
“wave length,” not “wave Link”.
Sorry.