Nov 01 2006
Apology Not Accepted
Senator Kerry keeps demonstrating how he and his party look down and dismiss the sacrifices of our brave men and women. This issue started because he implied (deliberately or accidentally) that those who fought and died for this country in Iraq were uneducated dupes who should have ‘tried to be smart’. Then he said it was a joke about Bush being dumb and uneducated getting us stuck in Iraq. Implying those who believed as Bush did that Iraq was a worthy cause (which Kerry echoed and a Democrat led Senate confirmed in a huge vote supporting the Iraq war) are just as dumb and as uneducated as the guy who led us into Iraq. Like somehow that made all the difference in terms of making the insult acceptable.
Now Kerry further insults the people of this nation and the brave heroes who have died in this nation’s cause, by not even having the decency to submit a sincere apology. The insincerity of the apology indicates that Kerry really does hold our military in low esteem. First, the window for a sincere apology was yesterday, before polls and political pressure was applied. Second, a sincere apology is given in person, eye to eye. It is not shoved out on a website because the Democrats are afraid Kerry may say something even more revealing. That is also an indication this is not sincere and simply a callous political CYA move. And Third, a sincere apology comes from the heart, not your staff. We have no idea if this is Kerry’s words, let alone his sincere beliefs. It doesn’t sound like him and there is no proof he did not just tell a staffer to write something up and get it out so, as CNN let slip, they can hold this story from bleeding over into a new day. An apology of this magnitude needs to have no caveats, rejoinders, diversions or other clutter. It should be said without ANY reference to Bush or the election – that would show sincerity. None of the comments from the Dems have had that critical feature.
And that is the fourth reason the Democrats are not being sincere at all. Hillary Clinton said defending our war dead from derision and insult was ‘a distraction’. The Democrats and liberal media keep saying this deflects from Bush’s Iraq war record. Excuse me, but we all know what the war record is in Iraq. It is the Democrats and Liberal media who cannot take the time to properly defend our war dead. It is these lefty partisan vultures who cannot take the time and muster the sincerity to make sure it is clear to one and all those who died on foriegn soil believing they were sacrificing for this country are truly honorable people.
No, the apology is not acceptable because it is not real or sincere. It was delayed to check polls overnight. It was made under pressure. It was not made in person. There is no indication it was Kerry’s true feelings at all. And it came with calls to not be distracted from the Democrat message. Kerry never apologized once for his disparaging comments from the Vietnam War, so I doubt his shallow little ego was able to muster one now. And you do not say your sorry because people took your words the wrong way. You say your sorry for using the wrong words. I have a better idea, why not vote the Dems out and see if they are still sorry for what happened, or whether they start blaming the reps and the American people for having the audacity to stand up for their fallen neighbors. No one insults our fallen heroes without hearing from me. I don ‘t care if you are foriegn or domestic, insulting those who gave it all for this country is a declaration of war, in my opinion. Bring on November 7th. Let’s end this ugly party’s credibility in this nation once and for all. The liberals have been belittling the credibilty of our military for so long, it is the least the nation could do but return the favor. Vote “Yes” for our military heroes in November – vote against the Dems.
More at Michelle Malkin’s as many of us are just not buying. Sadly too many are.
36 Responses to “Apology Not Accepted”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Kerry’s Non-Apology To The Military…
Update: Kerry Non-Apology Rejected by Pro-Troop Organization
Wow! Just got this email from Move America Forward
STATEMENT BY MELANIE MORGAN, CHAIR – MOVE AMERICA FORWARD
“Your non-apology is not accepted, Senator Kerry.
“John Kerry ha…
If we accept Kerry’s apology, can we then state that it’s our fault and the military’s fault (those bastards!) for misinterpreting John Kerry who, as everyone knows, has no record of attacking American servicemen?
From the Imus appearance this morning, approx. 6:40 in…
… the quotable Kerry:
I see, so it’s the U.S. military that is the problem. There are simply too many of them. And this creates terrorists and jihadists.
[posted on another thread here and elsewhere earlier today]
Just saw an ad by Gen Wesley(don’t know no better) Clark. His statement: So if you see a commercial telling you to be afraid of terrorism, remember, it’s because of Iraq”
So let me get this straight, Iraq caused 9/11?
terrorism wasn’t around BEFORE Iraq? Is he completely out of his mind, or is it politics?
we report, you decide
Wesley Clark is actually out of his mind. Politics doesn’t explain it with him. I’d try to find another example. He really is insane. Now back to John Kerry who is very sane, just cynical, elitist, and insulting to people who serve(d) honorably.
Is it just me, or has anyone else started to hear a deafening silence from the most vocal of the Dem leadership? Have they all been asked to shutup & disappear? Are they starting to learn?
What else would you expect from a guy who can tell the rice from the shrapnel when it embeds in his a** ?
DEVASTATING on Kerry:
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Kerryism [Victor Davis Hanson]
Kerry surely must be one of the saddest Democratic liabilities around. Some afterthoughts about his latest gaffe, which is one of those rare glimpses into an entire troubled ideology:
(1) How could John Kerry, born into privilege, and then marrying and divorcing and marrying out of and back into greater inherited wealth, lecture anyone at a city college about the ingredients for success in America? If he were to give personal advice about making it, it would have to be to marry rich women. Nothing he has accomplished as a senator or candidate reveals either much natural intelligence or singular education. Today, Democrats must be wondering why they have embraced an overrated empty suit, and ostracized a real talent like Joe Lieberman.
(2) How could Kerry possibly claim that he was thinking of the uneducated in the context of George Bush, who, after all, went to Harvard and Yale?
AJStrata: Read the whole thing
” Bring on November 7th. Let’s end this ugly party’s credibility in this nation once and for all.”-
You are a patriot, AJ
Kerry is an elitist moron. Lurch doesn’t have a drop if dignity. He would sell his mother to get to the Whitehouse. He is toast after this fiasco.
Dale,
It is not proper form to post an entire article. It is best to link with a snippet. Thanks!
AJStrata
Thanks for respecting others’ intellectual property rights, AJ. I approve.
Most of the democratic party is filled with elitists. They hate the military because the military requires discipline, following orders (60’s people hate orders), it requires believing in something bigger then self like country. The elitists want “it” now and it needs to feel good. By their definition only a moron would join the military. It is the elitists that insist that you not stay married or keep a baby one second past happy.
The elitists want the war over so they can reduce the military and spend the money on domestic things. Kerry’s words were exactly what he believes. MSM tried to explain what he meant, what is there to explain, his words are as plain as day. If not it is his responsibility to add the words he left out. When the whole world prints your words you had be better say what you intend to say.
I must say these people make me sick. I think I’m watching too much politics. The democratic party is so selfish, so self absorbed, so anti American, so ego-centric, so thoughtless, it is absolutely pathetic.
Please vote Nov. 7th., vision needs all the help it can get.
Apology NOT Accepted…
What AJ Strata said (bold emphasis is my own)…
John Kerry Issues a “Non-apology” Apology…
The Left still doesn’t get it: The military hates them almost as much as the Left hates the military.
……
John Kerry Issues a “Non-apology” Apology…
The Left still doesn’t get it: The military hates them almost as much as the Left hates the military.
……
Just think about it… let’s say it is just weeks prior to Democratic National Convention with Kerry, Clinton, Gore, Dean wanting the nomination and Kerry “told his joke”… what would the other 3 (and others) be saying right now about Kerry???
They are all silent just hoping it blows over and no one notices. Kerry has hurt all of them and they know it and we will see the results next Tuesday.
Right on, AJ!
Funny that Kerry didn’t even have the decency to say his apology in person, unlike yesterday when he couldn’t wait to get to the TV cameras so he could lash out against everyone from President Bush to Tony Snow. How pathetic!
We may well accept his apology but we will NOT forget!
roger that AJ, thanks!
Thank you for writing that the apology is not accepted. That chest beating, strutting thing that shouted “I apologize to no one” yesterday, would not do it even this morning on Imus, should have understood that thousands all over this country are still waiting for his apology for 1971. That is why we KNOW he really meant it, even if it slipped out. He even had the gall to comment on that this morning but now he has to put this non-apology out on a website? Never knew he was camera shy. Gutless.
AJ, in the nearly one year that I’ve been coming here, you’ve written some pretty passionate posts, but this one is right up near the top. As our friends the Brits would say: SPOT ON!!
I hope this incident energizes several million more voters to get out and vote Republican next Tuesday.
Dale, I friend of mine e-mailed me the VDH piece this afternoon. It’s also SPOT ON!!
Lets all go out on Tuesday and kick some Jack[ass].
Another excellent post AJ! Non-apology not accepted! AJ, the strata is a daily read for me. Appreciate ya!
Another spot-on quote, this one from blogger Baseball Crank:
“[W]here, I would ask, is the evidence that Kerry is better at admitting mistakes than Bush? This is a guy who brought all sorts of political grief to himself by stubbornly refusing for three decades to admit that he was wrong to repeat false charges, under oath and on national televison, that smeared his comrades in Vietnam as guilty of pervasive war crimes. Has Kerry admitted he was wrong to oppose nearly every aspect of the foreign policy strategy that President Reagan pursused to great effect in the closing and victorious chapter of the Cold War? Has he admitted he was wrong to oppose the use of force to kick Saddam out of Kuwait in 1991? Maybe I missed something, but I don’t even recall him admitting he was wrong for trying to slash the intelligence budget in the mid-1990s following the first World Trade Center bombing. Indeed, one of the most common threads throughout Kerry’s behavior in this campaign has been his unwillingness to take any personal responsibility for mistakes, from blaming his speechwriters for things that come out of Kerry’s own mouth to picayune things like blaming the Secret Service when he falls down on the slopes. As Jonah Goldberg notes, Kerry’s “liberal hawk” backers may argue that the decades of bad judgment in Kerry’s past are rendered inoperative by September 11, but Kerry’s stubborn insistence that he hasn’t changed in response to September 11, and that he had the right answers all along even when he wrote a book in 1997 that barely mentioned Islamic terrorism, gives the lie to the notion that Kerry is a model of self-reflection. Even the man’s own supporters can’t seriously defend the proposition – on which many of them heaped well-deserved scorn during the primary season – that Kerry has been consistent from the start on whether Saddam was a serious threat that justified a military response. Yet there Kerry stands, insisting to all the world what nobody believes, that he hasn’t changed his position. Preferring Kerry to Bush because Bush won’t admit mistakes is like preferring fresh water to salt water because salt water is wet.”
http://baseballcrank.com/archives2/2006/11/politics_the_fi_1.php
Forgot to mention, the above-quote was a reprint of a Baseball Crank blog post from 2004, hence the phrase “in this campaign”.
I’m surprised. Where are the little leftist Baghdad Bobs saying “He apologized, so move the @#$! on”?
For the record, I agree. That little “I’m sorry you didn’t get what I was saying” missive, written and posted by God knows who, doesn’t qualify as an apology, never mind a sincere one. No, a sincere apology would be Kerry saying in person something like “I insulted our military by saying what I did, and I’m sorry.” I don’t expect that Kerry will do that, though. If history is any precedent, Kerry will respond to a question with something defiant, like “I posted my apology already, so back off.”
Strata
“We all know what the war record is in Iraq.” You don’t, or you
wouldn’t have a years long history of portraying the on-ground
reality in overly optimistic terminology having scant
resemblance to the bleak truth.
Ken,
Unlike you I expected it to be much worse. But then I live in reality while you have some wierd TV Land thing going on. The goal is correct the progress vector is in the right direction. Wishing it would go faster is just naive.
You expected it to be much worse? Tell you what, AJ, take my word for this….I was not reading either this site, if extant, or any other of your comments in 2003 anywhere in cyberspace or in print.
So I might be going out on a limb by saying I’ll send you a ten dollar donation if you can provide me one instance of pre-war public
commentary on your part going against the grain of the neocons who assured us of easy victory.
Ken, I would say you are in the Land of Oz, except I’m afraid you are to the far left of it.
Pres Bush himself is on record as saying this would be a long hard war. I realize he’s not a neocon (I guess, I’m not even sure what a neocon is) but he’s the leader of the free world and he said it.
I wouldn’t expect you to know that as you seem to know little other than Israel is bad and America is worse.
If you think you know what a neocon is, give us a definition.
Didn”t see your military resume’ yet either, chickenhawk
Bush only said “long hard war” after he could no longer disguise the unanticipated insurgency which, as Woodward showed, he ordered his team never to mention existed the first few months it had set in.
Rummy followed with “long hard slog” contradicting his
2003 assurances of a months long war.
Cheney, Wolfowitz,Perle, Feith and Rumsfeld are all on pre-war record predicting a short war and stabilization of Iraq within a span of months. USA Today collected the embarrasing public quotes in a column last year.
http://www.amazon.com/Neo-Conned-Just-Principles-Condemnation-Iraq/dp/1932528040
http://www.neoconned.com
here provide two explanantions of “neocon” in depth.
Ken
One is a book named neoconned the other a looney left site called neoconned. Neither defines ‘neocon’
Wikipedia seems to define neocon as a person that was a liberal, democrat or socialist that is new to conservatism.
If you think that is anything close to what it means, then
Which of those persons you named above fit that category?
I don’t think any fit the category as “new” to conservatism. Not withing the last 20 years or so anyhow.
It is also defined as a derogatory term used by liberals, democrats and socialists, primarily to define the people that no longer believe in hating America as they themselves still do.
So I guess if I used the term S**thead to describe you, it would be about the equivalent.
Norman Podhoretz and William Kristol were important founders of the neocon movment. Many were indeed originally Trotskyites
and the increasing vulnerability of Israel motivated many to switch to a faux conservatism and push America into a slavishly pro-Israel
Middle East policy..although all had been doves on Vietnam.
http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
Buchanan provides relevant neocon names here.
Ken, I started to say you disappoint me that you didn’t do a simple google check on what you said, but then that is actually what I would expect.
William Kristol, a trotskyite and neocon. First, he’s not old enough. neocons were libs, dems or socialists that became conservatives in the early 60’s. That would have put Kristol in at age 8 or 9.
Podhoretz, old enough, but no ref on google to him ever having been a fruitcake, I mean lib, dem or socialist prior to early 60’s. Not saying he wasn’t just not found on google.
Don’t forget the definition:
Wikipedia seems to define neocon as a person that was a liberal, democrat or socialist that is new to conservatism in the early ’60s.
Buchanan’s list:
Richard Perle, only problem here is he was a dem at least until 1980. neocons became neocons in early 60’s, not late 80’s that would put him in the latter day cons. not neo.
David Brooks, he wasn’t even born til after the neocons were already in existence. So it’s not likely he was a Fruitcake(syn for lib, dem or socialist) prior to that time.
Ken, you should do a little basic research. Calling a jewish conservative a neocon is like calling them a nasty name, it is like calling Black people the N word, so I think to avoid racism or bigotry, you should avoid it.
And yes, I’m saying that to be a neocon as you seem to imply it is would mean you became a conservative in the early ’60s at the time of the “movement” joining in later doesn’t count. Doesn’t fit the definition. That would be like saying you were a WWII vet if you joined the Army in 1948 or later. You might be a vet, but not a wwii one. You might be a Conservative, but not a neocon.
Quit mixing apples and oranges. Just like calling you an American doesn’t make you one.
By the way Ken, I would expect you to be an admirer of Buchanan, he, formerly of the right, but now far left fringe, like you hates America also. He shows his hatred in opposite ways from you, but it’s there.