<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYTimes Plays Politics With 9-11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/282/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/282</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 911 Memorials  Blog</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/282/comment-page-1#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>911 Memorials  Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=282#comment-251</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NY Times Blasts Take Back Memorial Initative&lt;/strong&gt;


The New York Times in its lead editorial on July 12 blasted the &quot;Take Back the Memorial&quot; initiative.

The editorial said the initiative &quot;may not represent a majority of 9/11 families&quot; -- although virtually all organized family groups have oppos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NY Times Blasts Take Back Memorial Initative</strong></p>
<p>The New York Times in its lead editorial on July 12 blasted the &#8220;Take Back the Memorial&#8221; initiative.</p>
<p>The editorial said the initiative &#8220;may not represent a majority of 9/11 families&#8221; &#8212; although virtually all organized family groups have oppos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

