Dec 18 2006
Failure Is Not An Option
It seems Rumsfeld’s replacement is as bullish on Iraq as The Don himself. Gates is clearly laying down the law – failure is not an option. Neither is surrender in any cutsie variant Mad Murtha can conjure up. And that includes redeployment (a.k.a., an organized retreat). So while Bush and Gates play Churchill, the Dems Play Neville Chamberlain and the Islamists are besides themselves wondering when the promised surrender of Iraq (and therefore the entire ME) is going to happen. They are looking for the Dems to bring about America’s failure and demise. Fortunately the Dems don’t run the country, they just run their mouths.
Thanks for that info confirming that the Iraqi economy is booming. As you pointed out, it was measured in relation to prior years and is indeed booming. So you’re saying that 60% of the countries professionals have enough confidence to stay there and invest in the future.
So, you did finally find one thing to be right on, confirming that Iraq’s econ is booming, Thanks.
The French guy was finally right on one thing, give him credit.
“The UN High Commissioner for Refugees says that 1.6 million are displaced within the country and a further 1.8 million have fled abroad.”
To a warmongering liar who calls Cynthia McKinney a Moslem
simply because she wants Bush impeached and George Will
William Buckley and c onservativeRep.Congressmen Ron Paul
‘liberals” because they oppose the war, 1.8 million people
are nothing-even though if that figure were multiplied to
equal a similar proportion of Americans, even he might notice.
“So you’re saying that 60% of the countries professionals have enough confidence to stay there and invest in the future.”
What I’m saying is only an immoral bastard would write off as collatoral damage an immoral war which even he conceded
had driven 40% of a country’s professional class out of that country.
1.6 million displaced people. Wow, and that’s a measure of something. Mexico has 20 million or so displaced into America and we don’t claim that they are losing a war.
Didn’t you get the message, I didn’t say McKinney was a Moslem.
And who did you say was keeping the tally on how many stayed and how many left?
Name calling again, the product of a small mind with no message.
Are you ever right on anything?
I didn’t concede that any number had left. I couldn’t personally prove that even one person has left and don’t believe you can either.
Just saying that ‘someone’ is counting does not make it a fact.
Do you think a Pepsi is a Coke?
Calling it a Coke will not prove that it is a Coke. That’s your method.
Are you ever right on anything?
Geez, are you foaming at the mouth, you sound like a rabid dog? I’m not calling you a dog. I leave the name calling to you.
You couldn’t personally prove one word in the Newsweek article you flaunt is true either. You hypocrisy is only excused by senility.
And your senility caused you to misspell ‘comprehendible’ while lecturing Gil on the language.
Ken
“You couldn’t personally prove one word in the Newsweek article you flaunt is true either.”
Where did I say any of it was true? You don’t read very well do you? I only pointed to the article.
I didn’t misspell that word, I just typed it wrong? you don’t understand the difference, do you?
If I pointed out all the words you misspell, I wouldn’t have time to point out all the things you are wrong on. So I just overlook them.
Have you ever been right on anything? (Well, your agreeing that a majority of the professionals in Iraq are happy with what they have and elected to stay in Iraq) I’ll give you a correct on that.
Please don’t typo when you are lecturing others on incorrect spelling unless you wish to use senility exculpatorily. You used the
Newsweek article to make political points, senile one, which means you believed it, unless your senility has caused you to post on this site for reasons only excusable if you’re senile.
So, you are saying you believe everything you link to?
Maybe when you link to something it is because you want to point out that someone was wrong. Maybe not
But then you wouldn’t know the difference, only a senile person would.
There you go again, Ken you are the only person I know that is certifiably wrong 100% of the time, guaranteed.
You didn’t want me to cut and paste where you said you are French?
Why did they extract the English out of you?
Funny how you “typo” incorrectly keys on the opposite side of the board, a and i. I link to articles in correct context and stipulate
if there is something important contained therein with which I do not agree, apart from the central issue being argued. Unlike certain senile
cretins.
Who lie rather admit they misspell words.
I notice, even though I offered to prove where you said you were French that you didn’t take me up on it. Wonder why?
Could it be because you knew you had said it?
What does the word “juniur” mean in English?
Don’t you get tired of being wrong?
So, let this senile guy understand what you’re saying. If I link to an article, it’s because I believe in what it says. If you link to one, it’s to prove that you either ‘do’ or ‘don’t’ believe what’s in it. And you point out which it is.
Oh, okay how do us regular senile people get the right to do that also.
maybe ‘juniur’ is ‘junior’ in French?
Right, for example a senile fool cites an article (you did not link to it)
like Newsweek’s, and uses that article to bolster belief, otherwise
stated in many spots on the same site, in the progress in Iraq, then
brings into question his necessary belief in the article, while a scholar
stipulates which parts of an article he vouches for and which ,if any,
he does not. Naptime .
And senile people forget when they have been “taken up” on an
“offer.” Which you cannot do and know perfectly well you cannot.
I have never been wrong on essentials on the Iraq War on this site.As long as America Empire is losing bloodily in Iraq and the broad Mideast, there is no amount of otherwise tedious ennui senile people can toss at me here to drive me away. Haven’t you ascertained that?
Just using the phrase “America Empire ” shows dazzling ignorance.