Comments on: No More Terrorist Watch List

By: Harun

Harun — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 03:05:47 +0000

After some thought, I think maybe the GOP was lulled by the unity after 9/11 into thinking we would not need so many new laws passed by the both parties to “force” the Democrats to be on the record in support of these policies.

By: Harun

Harun — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 03:01:35 +0000

Wow, I must be coming in after a major flame war..

It seems to me that while the list is a good idea, the government broke its promise not to mix data and violated the law, too. It’s a perennial problem of incompetent bureaucracies, but we should expect more during war time. If they need a new law to do this correctly, well, the GOP had the house and senate since 2001 – 2006, they should have fixed these issues. (or did it just come down now that it was in violation?)

We need to do things right: pass the laws we need to combat terrorism and hold government agencies to be be competent and effective.

By: Ken

Ken — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:52:32 +0000

For Enforcement

“Sounds like a version of Crap.”

Thanks for synopsizing your comments writ large.

By: For Enforcement

For Enforcement — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:01:53 +0000

Ken, thanks for your clear and concise definition of you fromjust above:

“I have no clue”

We get it.

By: Gotta Know

Gotta Know — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:51:06 +0000

Amen Barbara. Happy holidays, I’ve enjoyed your comments.

By: Barbara

Barbara — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:49:55 +0000

Gotta know is right. Ignore Ken and let him rant in a vacumn.

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:09:25 +0000

Since many of their agents helped drive America into the unwinnable
war based on the premise the Iraqis would love us once we got there
and co-operate with us overwhelmingly in allowing us to instruct them in how to create a pro-American “democracy,” I suppose you still consider their faction “pro-American” despite the results, in your abysmal ignorance.

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:07:10 +0000

http://www.aipac.org/

Now this faction has been accused of spying on America, but most believe it’s just fine.

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:05:50 +0000

http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php

How about this “faction?”

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:04:30 +0000

http://www.ivaw.org/

I’ll help you decide.

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:03:40 +0000

Barbee dearest:

Please list the factions to which you refer. I have no clue what you are talking about. Is Iraq Vets Against the War one of them?

By: Barbara

Barbara — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:41:13 +0000

Ken

Thank you for correcting my spelling of Al Quaeda (oops, wrong again). Since you are so up on the spelling of this admirable -in -your- eyes organization could it possibly be that you are a member -in -good -standing and are given instructions on the latest spelling of their name among other things of a serious nature. I say admirable -in -your- eyes because you evidently feel they deserve to win this war in Iraq and the GWOT. This must be because you have called for the defeat of the US on practically every post or at the least say the US deserves to lose.

You never did answer my question. Did you find the other eight people to join your party? You know, if you should go to some mosque I’m sure you will find your American Firsters there but then again they might just be saying they were to get into your party. It’s amazing the lengths some people will go to get on the anti-American bandwagon.

Golly, it must be hard to separate all the anti-American factions prevalent in this country but I take my hat off to you because you’ve perservered until you got most of them. Your problem is that the people on this site recognize your agenda. Well, of course they have since you’ve been blatant as hell about it. In other words (just a little hint) dear, your reputation as an intellectual is shot.

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:13:02 +0000

For Enforcement

Have you corrected Barbara’s misspelling of Al Qaeda
as al Quaeda yet?

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:10:45 +0000

“I found it really hilarious when Ken said congress must declare war and the states had to ratify that declaration. I corrected him at that time. That alone shows he is either not an American or a remarkably dumb one.”

No dear, I corrected you when you misinterpreted the states
ratification part and you need correcting again.

By: For Enforcement

For Enforcement — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:05:46 +0000

Ken, it was comprehendable that I made the typo on. Geez now your memory is going also.

From that same post:
defecient, I suppose that’s French for deficient. Sounds like a version of Crap.

Bikerken, don’t you just hate it when Ken chews through his leather straps and starts foaming at the mouth? And now he’s done it with a French Muslim/English thesaurus. Oh well, here comes the onslaught.