Here are a collection of Global Warming links, with a brief excerpt. 
Before I do I want to note that this is becoming as contentious of an issue as any I have ever debated, and the politicking in it is sickening.
I am embroile…

Pretty funny actually.

Your cheap shot at AJ for his pre- election comments indicates that you can’t differentiate substance from speculation.

Last year’s Atlantic spring sea surface temperatures were also lower last year than the year before.

Overall folks, global warming is not a bad thing. If we were to cool the globe by only 1 degree, we would see a great reduction in food production. This would be felt most in places such as the central plains of Canada and across the Russian steppes. A frost early or late by only a couple of weeks can greatly impact crop yields.

I fear global cooling much more than global warming and so should poor countries who depend on food products that are grown in Northern lattitudes. A failed corn harvest in South Dakota would cause tortilla prices in Equador to skyrocket because corn is a world market.

Keep your eyes peeled concerning predictions for solar cycle 25. So far it looks like we might be setting into a solar pattern more likely to produce long term cooling than warming once cycle 24 is out of the way.

We have:
1) incomplete infromation
2) quick to judgment
3) large cost
4) long period of time
.. and then
5) claims of misinformation after setbacks

I bet the politicians will all be dead before the get to step 5 with the “War on Climate Change”.

It’s 9 below zero here in Chicago (30 below with the wind chill). So where’s that global warming Al Gore promised? Oh, that’s right. They’ll blame the cold on global warming, too. …

This Wall Street Journal editorial examines last week’s “breathless” global warming report. The IPCC has pulled back from their previous dire predictions:
More pertinent is the underlying scientific report. And according to people who…

As a matter of fact, judges shreak like pigs when their “discretionary powers” are curtailed. As they did, when the Legislature THREW THE BOOK AT THEM, and stopped “discretionary” in its tracks, WITH: SENTENCING GUILDLINES. Judges hate them. But they ‘must abide.’

As to Libby’s case? Strictly INSIDE THE BELTWAY. Lots of folks see this as a partisan effort, by the press, to take down Bush, the way the press got such a good shot at Nixon. But since then? More bloody noses, than success. Reagan stood firm. And, Clinton didn’t suffer.

I’d add that Michael Jackson didn’t suffer, either. While Sneddon, and the press corps couldn’t budge the jury to convict. After “that” verdict came out? The press upped and left. And, the jurors went home to normal lives. (THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE PRESENTED PROVING SNEDDON’S CASE! While I rarely watch TV, when the verdict came in. I flipped it on. And, waited for the jurors to be interviewed. I came away learning a lot of stuff about human nature.) I hope Wells has picked a good jury, here. But if not? It’s strictly “INSIDE THE BELTWAY.” It will affect Libby’s life. On the other hand? Look at Martha Stewart. She just took her wallet off the table; kept the ankle bracelet. And, put it behind her.

While the press? You think they’re influencial OUTSIDE the beltway? I don’t.

And, I don’t think all that much about the crap that gets politically elected to carry “gavels.” Weasels. Legal lynchings, however, do eventually come back to haunt. If there was a long view, we’d get out of the partisan bullshit business. Mainstream Americans aren’t buying this garbage. While jury trials? A throw of the dice! As if Vegas was the “operator” you wanted your laws to stand on. Pffeh.

Less religion, today. But the same “needs” among the ignorant, to think they’re smart scientists.

Richard Feynman noticed this, when people would approach him, (thinking of themselves as geniuses, on par with his own mental talents.) And, they’d ask him, “have you tried this number?”

Oy. All the obvious numbers WERE tried already!

But it didn’t stop those who came by and wanted to see if they could interest him “in some debate.”

Given that even high schoolers get some “earth science,” I am puzzled at how people believe (because of their weather pattern) that, yes, “those poor polar bears are sitting on top of melting ice.” But at the zoo? Not uncommon for polar bears to SWIM. And, where was “that” photographer standing? To take “that” silly picture? He wasn’t at home, ya know. And, he wasn’t walking on water, either.

AJ (“Permanently Down Alice’s Rabbit Hole”) Strata only sees failure in progress (GW science) and success in failure (Iraq). Now, then will the accuracy of Strata’s predictions on the last election find reprise in th outcome of the Libby trial? (Not much posting on Libby here of late, eh wot?)

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/02/a_necessary_apocalypse.html

also you can use http://tinyurl.com/2pfc2o