Feb 21 2007
Coming To A Street Near You
The Democrats are in a world of political hurt. Their radical (and not entirely sane) anti-war base wants to surrender to Iraq as soon as possible, but brand new poll is out confirming an earlier poll showing Americans are in not in the mood to quit Iraq, but they instead want to win Iraq as soon as possible (H/T to MacRanger on the latest poll).
By a 53 percent – 46 percent margin, respondents surveyed said that Democrats are going too far, too fast in pressing the President to withdraw troops from Iraq.
By identical 57 percent – 41 percent margins, voters agreed with these statements: I support finishing the job in Iraq, that is, keeping the troops there until the Iraqi government can maintain control and provide security and the Iraqi war is a key part of the global war on terrorism.
As I stated previously, if Bush gets continued traction with the Surge plan (beyond chasing al Qaeda and the Mahdi leaders out of the country or into hiding – which is already a result) thden the Dems will be a deep, long political price as the party that tried to quit on America when she needed resolve and confidence in her armed forces. And it is clear that Americans understand the ramifications:
By a wide 74 percent – 25 percent margin, voters disagree with the notion that “I don’t really care what happens in Iraq after the U.S. leaves, I just want the troops brought home.”
Why the cold hard realism? Well they know, as bad as it is now in Iraq, if we leave that will give the Islamo Fascists a base on resources to bring things like this too our shores and into our neighborhoods:
Insurgents exploded a truck carrying chlorine gas canisters Wednesday – the second such “dirty” chemical attack in two days … The gas cloud in Baghdad, meanwhile, suggests possible new and coordinated strategies by bombers trying to unleash toxic – and potentially deadly – materials. “Terrorists are using dirty means,” said Brig. Gen. Qassim Moussawi, an Iraqi military spokesman.
Not only is this a strong possible result of surrendering Iraq prematurely, the fact is no Dem is willing to claim it is LESS LIKELY that we will see increased attacks in America if we surrender Iraq. Those who would make such a claim would be dismissed as suicidal. And rightfully so. America was promised rabid changes in Iraq. Surrender and increased threats at home were not what they had in mind when they bought into the Dems vague promises of action.
Look at the millions spent appeasing the Barbary Islam Pirates for twenty years!
The only graceful exit is VICTORY!
How long does it take to build democracy?
And you approve Madeline Albright shaking Kim’s hand?
And you approve Madeline Albright’s comment that killing Saddam’s 500,000 children is worth it?
And you approve us siding with Stalin to go against Hitler?
And you approve Clinton being an ally of Yasser Arafat?
And you approve Hizbollah going after Israel?
And you approve the wipeout of Israel off the map?
And you approve Syria and Iran targetting nuclear arms against any Western country?
Terrye waxes : “I have argued for some time (since at least 1996 in print) that the global jihadis are the natural heirs of the Communists; that when push comes to pull, totalitarians of a feather stick together. Over and over, in virtually every corner of the globe (well, you know what I mean!), Communists ally with jihadis:’
Blowback on the Russian part for America’s initial FUNDING the
jihad to oust the Bear from Afghanistan.
And here’s a poll which trumps them all: over half of the
Sunnis and Shias combined APPROVE of continued insurgent attacks on US troops. OUT NOW!
Lurker obviously is “unfamiliar” with my long-state non-interventionism.
Was not living but in retrospect would ahve oppose entry into
what became WW2.
I condemn Albright and did so at the time.
Clinton was no ally of Arafat but your comment shows your
Israeli partisianship-the Palestinians en masse rejected Clinton’s
Dennis Ross’ engineered travesty. Ross of course is a Zionist.
Hezbollah has a right to fight until Israel vacates the West Bank
and Samaria.
Preferably the entire Mideast should be de-nuclearized but I
find none hear calling for Israel to give up its nukes, only
fantasies about Syria having nukes as above…
Ah so, you condemn Thomas Jefferson for going after the Barbary Islam Pirates?
You haven’t been listening to Nasrallah’s speeches, haven’t you? Hizbollah’s intent is to totally wipe out Israel off the world map. They will not stop after they get West Bank and Samaria.
Check http://www.memri.org site and begin listening to Nasrallah.
So you still want to see Israel completely wiped off the world map?
So you don’t believe in the Holocaust? And willing to see the second Holocaust?
Hizbollah’s intent is to totally wipe out Israel off the world map.
Hizbollah’s, AQ, Hamas, and other radical Muslims want America off the world map. That is their goal established LONG before 9/11 attacks and LONG before we invaded Iraq and won the war against Iraq in 3 weeks.
So you have no qualms seeing those radical Muslims attacking us in our own country?
So you’re also saying that we had no right to take Texas from Mexico?
So you’re saying that we had no right to take North America from the indians?
So you’re saying that we had no right to take LA from France?
Hawaii?
Alaska?
Philipines?
Puerto Rico?
Should Mexico have every right to fight to get Texas back under its control?
I don’t understand your comment why Hizbollah having every right to fight over West Bank and Samaria.
LurkerDude – do you know why the Texians stole Tejas from Mexico??
Slavery was ILLEGAL in Mexico – so DaAvey and Jim and Travis died at the Alamo for the sacred right to own slaves.
Yee-hah!
Ah-ha! So you would have no problems seeing Hizbollah take over all of Israel so that they can make those Jews slaves under them?
That’s exactly what those Barbary Islamic pirates did!
What Thomas Jefferson learned
from the Muslim book of jihad
Ah-ha! So you would not have any problems seeing Hizbollah and Hamas wipe out Israel off the world map and making those Jews slaves under them?
Exactly what those Barbary Islamic pirates did:
What Thomas Jefferson learned
from the Muslim book of jihad
Lurker don’t resort to outright lies. I made no comment at all about the ethics of Jefferson’s Barbary Pirates conflict. It is enough
dealing with your fallacious arguments ; no need for complete fiction.
I have already stated America’s right to its sphere of influence in this hemisphere,in fact, a dominant one, but until it gets its empire of bases and meddling out of the Moslem regions of the East, there is no comparison with Jefferson’s actions. If and when we do so , the jihadists proceed to interfere with shipping, that is another matter, but until we do so we can expect defensive blowback.
http://www.postchronicle.com/news/breakingnews/article_21265583.shtml
Israeli Arabs have just presented demands for a bi-national state. They have every right to this.
Are you Arab Muslim, by any means?
The books of Qur’an, Sura, Hadith say that once they own the land, they own it permanently. Because they once owned the land of Israel, their goal is to wipe out Israel off the world map.
I prefer the offense blowback by fighting in their own land in addition to the defense of our own country.
Sorry but I am not resorting to outright lies. I see them as truth and facts but you don’t. All you do is spewing negativity on us and call us liars and crackers.
Never called you a cracker. Jews lived in the area
now known as Israel peacefully long before Palestine was
Zionized, that is , stolen from the natives by floods of
people with little Semitic blood in their veins. Those with
deeds have a right to return and decide how the land should be
governed in a national plebiscite.
Israel has opened doors to the Palestinians for many years but many stayed in other countries as refugees. The Palestinians did not want to co-exist with the Jews. They want to force the Jews as “Dhimmis”.
Funny you don’t honor the 1948 vote to recognize Israel as a country.
What deeds are you talking about? The book of Qur’an, Sura, and Hadith do not mention deeds at all. They just want to own the entire land of Israel and force those Jews to become dhimmis.
Yes, Israel has opened doors to the Palestinians’ own house. Nice of them. At Clinton’s fiasco, run by the Zionist Dennis Ross (wonder how many US servicepeople have been killed in Iraq by Arabs resentful that America places bigots representing two percent of our population in command of its Mideast policy?) they were offered a few rooms to their erstwhile house, provided Israelis could keep the halls.
No dice.
Your ignorance here is also highlighted by the fact a third
of Palestianians are Christians ,eg Hana Ashwari, and have not been
treated as dhimmi.