Apr 05 2007
Pouting Democrats
From the party that bolted Texas so the People’s House in Texas could align representation to fit the voters’ party association, the whines and pouts that Bush used a legal action (used by Dems of course when they want their way) to appoint controversial (yet competent) people to posts is just pathetic. Dems: win Presidential elections and then you can play President – it’s that simple. The Dems have just been outmaneuvered because they vacationed while our troops on the front lines are running out of material and ready replacements. Next time finish the nation’s business.
What’s it gonna take for people to realize Bush has made enemies within the GOP camp? He’s no more popular than his dad ever was! For starters.
You want to blame the donks? Why?
None of us know how things pan out, ahead, either.
But up at InstaPundit, the other day. I saw an article that alludes to Bush’s next pick for a supreme court justice. (While I was minding my own business!)
It seems Bush may tap a Yale dean. A guy named Koh. Who is as liberal a choice as you can get. And, yes. Glenn Reynolds LINKED to Professor Bainbridge.
It’s like getting a heads up. Ahead of time!
Bush will never get credit for doing the MOST he can for the donkey party! Including affirmative action hires that went beyond just Clinton’s Betty Currie. (His secretary who cleaned up his sink.) And, that was “it” … when it came to affirmative action hires done by Bubba.
What do you make of what you see? And, why are you wasting time complaining about things you don’t elect! Hello. You don’t elect donks to positions of anything.
You did, however, choose Dubya. And, Dubya, who can’t give a speech to save his life; is in the business of taking what he wants. Just the same. It’s to no advantage to play dumb, to his dumber.
Tony Blair doesn’t even play with Bush!
And, Maliki? Finally is willing to cooperate with our military!
Where Blair couldn’t get the five iranians, held by Maliki, FREED.
So, take heart.
There are things you control
And, things you don’t.
And, one of the advantages to the blogger’s-sphere; is that we do get information, coming down the pike, that is not controlled by the idiots in DC, either.
But changes are on the horizon.
Bush? Practically gave away the store.
And, IF? Or, more likely WHY DID GLENN REYNOLDS send out links to alert people who wouldn’t want to see another liberal ending up on the Supreme’s bench …
Why did Glenn Reynolds link to Professor Bainbridge?
AH. And, why am I repeating what I read, here?
Because KOH is the last choice you’d want to see the white house trucking out. (While Bush is capable of just about anything! As long as he can get “someone” confirmed!)
Stay alert, folks. Bush has actually managed to run aground.
ANd, I’m not playing the piniatta game of swinging at weak characters.
That’s the donk’s problems. They’ve got a lock on all the special interests. All the local crap that caters to pork. And, hardly anything else.
While I think the donks’ “majority” isn’t really there. Unless you’re using a magnifying glasss, to see things.
By the time Bush leaves office, he will have more people who are willing to vote for a GOP candidate, than you can shake a stick at!
Bush, is to the White House, what mayor Dinkins was to New York City!
And, don’t assume the democraps don’t know it!
As to recent events? Tony Blair showed you that England is on its own road map.
Merkel? Wow. Did I get surprised that the germans are now hoping the Israelis win. And, aren’t reduced to becoming victims to the House of Saud.
Why should the Saudis win? They gave us 9/11. They’ve tossed out a much more home grown approach to Islam; that once existed in mom and pop branches of the faith.
You think iran’s ahead? Nah. Just sitting on lots of oil money. As do the Sauds.
With eygpt going to hell in a handbasket.
Pelosi blew her opporunity! She could have reiterated to Assad, “no deals” until the two Israeli hostages are returned.
But so far? That’s not the way pelosi goes. She went, instead, to appease the blacks. Who are now contaminated with muslem voters. Keeping “special interests” limited to local politics.
Bush burned up so much good credit, you have no idea!
And, beware. Because more than just the House of saud is in play, now.
It seems Glenn Reynolds expects to see a vacancy up on the Supreme’s bench. And, “complimenting Bush” is about the last thing you should be doing!
Pay attention! There’s a test, coming up.
If we’re lucky? Bush can’t pull another Souter.
If he does? Expect Koh to be the Bush choice, as he intends to fool everyone, yet again, with his crumby affirmative action picks.
On the other hand? You can grow strong! Bush can lose even more people who have become disenchanted. It’s not just a Bush Derangement fallacy anymore.
Sure. I could be wrong. But Glenn Reynold’s alert. Prudent, is more likely. Than not.
Picking on the donks, is a waste of time. If you think pigs fly, then watch pelosi giving altitude to hillary’s hips. Both ladies got the hips department covered. And, condi? She’s a loser, too. But you don’t have to believe me. All you have to do, though, is watch the show.
Carol:
That made no sense. And everyone loses people. In fact you lost me a long time ago and I bet you lost a lot more people too.
I am glad Bush made this appointment, it is not a big deal, but the man did not deserve to be punished by the Democrats.
And Bush did bring more people to the Republican party than ever before. He got more hispanics voting Republican and he helped bring about one of the largest Republican majorities ever. They did not stick together and people can blame Bush for that, but if not for him they might not have done as well as they did.
“What’s it gonna take for people to realize Bush has made enemies within the GOP camp? He’s no more popular than his dad ever was! For starters.”
According to Rasmussen on Bush’s approval numbers:
“The President earns approval from 75% of Republicans ”
Which isn’t too shabby. While Bush’s approval ratings are somewhat low (higher than, say, Truman’s were) it is very partisan. It isn’t across the board disapproval as Nixon’s was. Nixon and Carter lost their own party’s approval. Bush hasn’t.
It was very disengenious of the dims to disapprove of Fox on the basis that he donated money to the Swift Boaters. What, are they saying anyone who donates to the opposing party is not eligible to be appointed to a post in the government? That the president cannot appoint a man to an ambassorship if he donated money to his party?
Talk about sore losers . I don’t see anyone in the dim party denegating George Soros or any of the other big donors to the dim party. What is this…a double standard. Uh……………of course it is.