May 10 2007
Dems Are “Crumbling”
Just snatched this bit of great news off Memeorandum:
It’s time to replace some conservative Democrats in Washington, DC. I just heard from an impeccable source that there is serious concern on the Hill that conservative Democrats in the House will vote with the Republicans to strip any and all restrictions from the Iraq supplemental tomorrow, effectively giving Bush all the money he wants with no restrictions and no effort to hold either him or the Iraq government accountable for anything. I.e., they will vote to continue this war along the same disastrous course because they’re too afraid to challenge George Bush and his failed leadership.
Let me reiterate: This isn’t some idle rumor. The concerns are coming from Hill sources themselves.
Why do you think moderate/conservative Dems are shifting abruptly? As I have been posting for a month now, watch Diyala Province. The SurrenderMedia screwed the Surrendercrats big time by NOT publicizing the successes of Anbar Province. Outside of a few of us bloggers paying close attention, the public is blissfully unaware of the situation there. And with Diyala shifting to the same model as Anbar, the public can now be presented with story after story of successful progress. The SurrenderMedia sat on the news, letting it build up energy for the impact when it breaks. We will be going from “the war is lost” to ” amazing progress is made in the stronghold of al Qaeda in Iraq”….
If I was a moderate I would run for the hills too!
Update: Much more here – looks like it is for real:
“We’ll see what happens,†said Rep. Bud Cramer, D-Ala. “A lot of us are coming together across the aisle. We’re under the radar now, but we’re meeting.â€
Wonder how bad a hit the Surrendercrats will take on this one? Once some break the Out Of Iraq caucus will go back into their isolationist camp and it will be all over for the Dems.
There are moderate and conservative Democrats? Who knew?
Now we know how the Democrats managed to gain majority of both houses!
ROTFLMAO – the alert from Memeorandum made me laugh. The poster wrote: they’re too afraid to challenge George Bush and his failed leadership.
Umm, excuse me but Nancy is the one that is looking behind herself and her gaggle ain’t as big as it was and GW’s is watching his band of brothers growing!
Now, tell me who’s leadership failed? LOL
Seems that some Dems are willing to put country before party.
Seems like some Warpublicans insist on perjury and obstruction of justice as a way of life – as this late breaking story shows:
The technical term is obstruction of justice. Adn we’re about to sese who does the crumbling – the Democrats or the Warpublicans.
Soothie,
This is recycled news! Besides, You don’t even read what you post!
Here is the last paragraph you posted:
In one of the letters that Sampson drafted, dated February 23, 2007, the Justice Department told four Senate Democrats it was not aware of any role played by senior White House adviser Rove in attempting to name Griffin to the U.S. attorney post. A month later, the Justice Department apologized in writing to the Senate Democrats for the earlier letter, saying it had been inaccurate in denying that Rove had played a role.
Some obstruction! LOL
DOJ issued an apology for it’s previous inaccuracy.
We are about to see the DUMBOcrats crumble! This is nothing but a MANUFACTURED scandal which is crumbling. You can tell it is crumbling because they have to RECYCLE news! LOL
Broad paint brush on (the Bush administration) broad paint brush off. who exactly was it who did it?
Broad paint brush on(the Democrats are denying war time funds to front line troops) broad paint brush off. Who exactly in the Democratic party??
This is a fun game, almost as much fun as clip, snip, cherry pick.
So they Justice department clarified their mistake???
Soothsayer
This is recycled news! You don’t even read what you post!
Here is the last paragraph you posted:
In one of the letters that Sampson drafted, dated February 23, 2007, the Justice Department told four Senate Democrats it was not aware of any role played by senior White House adviser Rove in attempting to name Griffin to the U.S. attorney post. A month later, the Justice Department apologized in writing to the Senate Democrats for the earlier letter, saying it had been inaccurate in denying that Rove had played a role.
Some obstruction! LOL
DOJ issued an apology for it’s previous inaccuracy.
We are about to see the DUMBOcrats crumble! This is nothing but a MANUFACTURED scandal which is crumbling. You can tell it is crumbling because they have to RECYCLE news! LOL
What happened to the post I attempted to post earlier? I am going to attempt to repost.
Soothsayer
This is old news. You don’t even read what your own possts!
Here is the last paragraph you posted:
In one of the letters that Sampson drafted, dated February 23, 2007, the Justice Department told four Senate Democrats it was not aware of any role played by senior White House adviser Rove in attempting to name Griffin to the U.S. attorney post. A month later, the Justice Department apologized in writing to the Senate Democrats for the earlier letter, saying it had been inaccurate in denying that Rove had played a role.
Some obstruction! LOL
DOJ issued an apology for it’s previous inaccuracy.
We are about to see the Democrats crumble! This is nothing but a MANUFACTURED scandal which is crumbling. You can tell it is crumbling because they have to RECYCLE news! LOL