Jul 29 2007
Hillary’s Cleavage?
To show how vapid the DC and NY news media truly are, the top story Sunday was supposedly about Hillary Clinton’s cleavage. OK, my may not be young, but I have yet to see much of any cleavage in the photo that goes with the story. And so I am wondering why the country is being inflicted with the imagination (PR or Freudian) of some deranged reporter, since all of us know cleavage when we see it. Is this the only story of worth?
Is there nothing about our energy situation to cover? Nothing on immigration reform? Nothing on embryonic stem cell snake oil? How about the war in Iraq? Surely, now that we are turning the tide there, something must be happening that overshadows (literally or figuratively) Hillary’s cleavage?
This is why America is turning their back on the news media and ready to dump the entire city of DC out on the street and start fresh. Personally, if I had to march a group of people to the borders to deport them I would be less worried about the long time immigrants and more with the fools who run the news media and their puppet masters in Congress. Hillary’s cleavage? I can only imagine, in full terror, what else the vapid media will inflict on us in the coming election year’s theatrics.
I can not imagine that this woman could actually become president, cleavage or no cleavage.
As for what else they could cover, I don’t know if I want them to cover immigration. The right will just start raving about the reconquista and the North American Union and how the Republicans tried to sell us out, blah blah blah and that will only help Hillary.
Let them talk about oil, and how we need to become more energy independent or something like that. Then the Democrats will have to be too busy dealing with their own loons to notice the other side’s loons.
Perhaps it’s the old pendulum thing… MSM were the KINGS (and a few Queens), now folks can find their own way (NOT)…Witness the ‘KOS crowd vs NRO, Hewitt,….. All think they know the truth, just like the previous generation. Nothing is absolutely true, just swings of the pendulum. DORF
i’m willing to bet hillary’s war room, led in this case by ann lewis, probably set the whole thing up. toss up soft balls so she hit them out of the park as the victim—always in pink i might add.
i can see terrye has not got her counseling on immigration yet. still seeing those detox demons……..
AJ, I haven’t agreed with you on the immigration issue….but I’ll cheerfully agree to shipping the elected twits and their propaganda press toadies overseas in lieu of illegals. Time to take out the trash.
Let the paleocon’s rant. They will have the destruction of America on their hands from colluding to elect a democrat/global socialist.
She needs something to get the 18 to 25 year old male vote and the word “cleavage” will generally get them interested in having a look and so that increases her recognition among a group of voters who were too young when she was in the white house.
Also understand that the 18 year olds who are going to vote in 2008 have been hearing nothing but Bush bashing since they were 10 years old. The 25 year olds were too young to vote in 2000 but have heard the Bush bashing indoctrination from the media since they were 17.
Most of the 18 to 25 year old group has never heard a positive word about a Republican in the mass media for their entire politically aware life.
patrick:
I am not the one who needs the counseling. I did not call the president Jorge nor did I call people like McCain and Kyl traitors while I announced to all and sundry that the government would never ever secure the borders because they had sold us out to the Mexicans in an effort to bring about the North American Union… or some such paranoid nonsense.
I did not go on right wing web sites and talk about how we should mow down the wet backs at the border. I did not make cracks about Jeb Bush’s mex wife and his brown skinned son. I did not say those people were not really laborers at all, they were an invasion force of diseased criminals sent here to ruin America.
But I did read all those things and much worse on web sites or heard them on certain right wing radio and TV shows and I was struck by how few people bothered to contradict or reprimand them. Nope, it was all good, if it helped save America.
Now after we hear for months that the Senate does not want to save America, that like Jorge they sold us out to the forces of darkness they actually do pass a security bill that has less security provisions than the one they did not pass and the same hardliners who swore these people had sold us out and had no intention of ever securing the border are patting themselves on the back all happy as clams.
I remember when the administration said they wanted to gain operational control of the border and the reaction was derision. yeah sure, they said, why not just secure the border they said, operational control is just away to get around actually having a wall, a real honest to God beautiful wall.
Now all of a sudden operational control is a legitimate goal and it is all good.
Meanwhile we have opted to just sort of ignore much of the occupying force sent by Mexico in their invasion and to completely avoid reforming the system to deal with people overstaying their visas etc….in spite of the fact that they make up half the illegals.
No, time to move on…nothing to see here…..anyone who says different needs counseling. No one in the chicken house but us foxes.
My guess is Hillary is very appreciative of the efforts of people such as yourself to alienate Independents and hispanics, that together with her cleavage and she just might win the White House.
Thanks for nothing patrick.
In fact I noticed that Gonzales has been vindicated per his meeting with Ashcroft. This is interesting because a lot of the same right wing sites who went after the administration in regards to everything from Harriet Miers to immigration were calling for this man’s resignation long ago. Once again they aided the opposition in an effort to attack the administration and this time it turns out they were wrong again.
1. Excellent example from AJ, making clear what is meant by “cleavage”.
2. Have yet to see Hillary display anything remotely similar to the example.
3. Gonzales vindicated???? Ah, geeze, Terrye . . . anybody want to double down on whether Alberto serves out his tenure as AG??? I’m betting dollars to doughtnuts!!
4. Mmmmmmmm. Doughnuts.
soothie:
You have been saying that for some time and he still there. Tell me, other than refusing to kiss Schumer’s ass, just what did he do that was wrong?
Oh yeah, big brother.