<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Consensus On Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poptech</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342/comment-page-1#comment-230301</link>
		<dc:creator>Poptech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 04:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342#comment-230301</guid>
		<description>NO &#039;Consensus&#039; on &quot;Man-Made&quot; Global Warming
http://www.populartechnology.net/2007/10/no-consensus-on-global-warming.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO &#8216;Consensus&#8217; on &#8220;Man-Made&#8221; Global Warming<br />
<a href="http://www.populartechnology.net/2007/10/no-consensus-on-global-warming.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.populartechnology.net/2007/10/no-consensus-on-global-warming.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarbaraS</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342/comment-page-1#comment-211520</link>
		<dc:creator>BarbaraS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342#comment-211520</guid>
		<description>Global warming is a democrat ploy.  They have nothing else.  This is just a way to get our money and bring down our economy.  I guarantee that global warming will go away once a democrat gets into the presidency.  Up to that point it is all rhetoric to ruin the economy and bring down Bush.  That is their number one obsjective.  All these bigwigs who call on the rest of us to give up this and that are giving up nothing.  It&#039;s the &quot;little people &quot; who must sacrifice, folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is a democrat ploy.  They have nothing else.  This is just a way to get our money and bring down our economy.  I guarantee that global warming will go away once a democrat gets into the presidency.  Up to that point it is all rhetoric to ruin the economy and bring down Bush.  That is their number one obsjective.  All these bigwigs who call on the rest of us to give up this and that are giving up nothing.  It&#8217;s the &#8220;little people &#8221; who must sacrifice, folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonhayes</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342/comment-page-1#comment-211404</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonhayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 06:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342#comment-211404</guid>
		<description>The notion that there is anything resembling a consensus on climate change is laughable.

A few quick points:
- most serious climate scientists don&#039;t want anything to do with the politics that surround this issue. Getting involved would be a death knell for their work.
- The SPMs is a consensus of government bureaucrats, not the scientists who worked on the IPCCs Working Group paper
- Most of the scientists who worked on the the working group paper were only involved in small portions of the whole report. They couldn&#039;t have given their assent to the entire thing because they wouldn&#039;t have know what was in the complete report until after it was finished.
- the national science academy statements have been widely questioned. For example, the Yury Izrael (with the Russian Academy of Sciences) said the Russian&#039;s signature on the 2005 joint statement was &quot;a misunderstanding.&quot; The former President of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences Bruce Albert said &quot;we definitely did not approve the (London) Royal Society press release.&quot; Others have raised similar questions about the Canadian signature.

There is no &quot;consensus,&quot; and even if there was, consensus does not make science.

AJ is absolutely correct on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that there is anything resembling a consensus on climate change is laughable.</p>
<p>A few quick points:<br />
- most serious climate scientists don&#8217;t want anything to do with the politics that surround this issue. Getting involved would be a death knell for their work.<br />
- The SPMs is a consensus of government bureaucrats, not the scientists who worked on the IPCCs Working Group paper<br />
- Most of the scientists who worked on the the working group paper were only involved in small portions of the whole report. They couldn&#8217;t have given their assent to the entire thing because they wouldn&#8217;t have know what was in the complete report until after it was finished.<br />
- the national science academy statements have been widely questioned. For example, the Yury Izrael (with the Russian Academy of Sciences) said the Russian&#8217;s signature on the 2005 joint statement was &#8220;a misunderstanding.&#8221; The former President of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences Bruce Albert said &#8220;we definitely did not approve the (London) Royal Society press release.&#8221; Others have raised similar questions about the Canadian signature.</p>
<p>There is no &#8220;consensus,&#8221; and even if there was, consensus does not make science.</p>
<p>AJ is absolutely correct on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owl</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342/comment-page-1#comment-211283</link>
		<dc:creator>owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342#comment-211283</guid>
		<description>There is a reason for their madness.  When Bush came into office, it was just about excepted fact that the UN was the Be All, Know ALL of our universe.  I heard Carl Levin and Dianne Feinstein give them the okay  as America&#039;s Decider. 

Global Warming=Global Taxes.   Money/Power.

I am just glad there are people like you who are smart enough to rip holes in this hoax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a reason for their madness.  When Bush came into office, it was just about excepted fact that the UN was the Be All, Know ALL of our universe.  I heard Carl Levin and Dianne Feinstein give them the okay  as America&#8217;s Decider. </p>
<p>Global Warming=Global Taxes.   Money/Power.</p>
<p>I am just glad there are people like you who are smart enough to rip holes in this hoax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Singleton</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342/comment-page-1#comment-211280</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/4342#comment-211280</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No consensus on Global Warming...&lt;/strong&gt;

Only the people wanting to use it as an excuse to make us do or not do something pretend there is a consensus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No consensus on Global Warming&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Only the people wanting to use it as an excuse to make us do or not do something pretend there is a consensus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

