There is mounting evidence that the government knew enough prior to al-Qaeda’s bombing of the USS Cole in 2000, that the USS Cole should never have been refueling in Aden, Yemen on the day of that attack. Mike Kasper the creator and blogger of the Abl…

As you can see on this original chart that was produced by Orion Scientific in 1999, Loral Corp. was one of the companies with close ties to the Clintons that were identified by LIWA in 1999 as being involved with Chinese missile and weapon prolifera…..

http://www.newsmax.com/smith/clinton_scandals/2007/09/06/30351.html

A passage from that link is clipped below:

One would think the Democrats are getting tired of the Arkansas dynasty and all that it brings to the forefront of American justice. Yet, Hillary has another major donor linked to China scandals that few talk about. Former Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz has made massive donations to the Democrat Party and its associated 527 liberal advocacy groups. In fact, Schwartz has donated nearly $4 million to the DNC and Hillary Clinton.

Schwartz has a long donation history with the Clintons. In a September 1994 memo to then President Clinton, Harold Ickes, White House chief of staff, informed him that Schwartz could be used to raise campaign donations “in order to raise an additional $3,000,000 to permit the Democratic National Committee to produce and air generic TV/radio spots as soon as Congress adjourns.”

Ickes then urged Clinton to invite Schwartz to the White House “to impress [him] with the need to raise $3,000,000 within the next two weeks.” In another memo, Ickes informed Clinton that Schwartz “is prepared to do anything he can for the administration.” Between October 1995 and March 1996, as Clinton mulled over whether to ignore State, Justice, and Defense Departments’ reasons against granting Loral waivers to export advanced military technology to China, Loral Chairman Bernard Schwartz injected more than $150,000 into the DNC’s coffers.

In 1996, President Clinton moved the oversight of satellite exports from the State and Defense Departments to the Commerce Department. After Clinton’s decision to lift the ban in Loral’s case and to allow the exportation of the company’s technology to the Chinese military, Loral CEO Schwartz handed over an additional $300,000 to the DNC.

Yet, in 1994 President Clinton personally authorized Schwartz to meet with a key Chinese politico — Commissioner Shen Roujun. It is here the story gets real interesting.

There are those who claim that the Clinton administration only lied to the world about sex. The claims are wrong because I was a witness to the smashing of the biggest Clinton lie. I am not a lawyer but I have won three out of four cases brought before a federal court. The wins were against the best lawyers that the government could buy. The victories also came at a cost, not to me, but to the credibility of the U.S. government and the Clinton presidency.

The first and most damaging lie that the Clinton lawyers made was that the Chinese commissioner, Shen, was a civilian representative of the communist government. This claim, and the accompanying claim of personal and business privacy made on behalf of Loral and Bernard Schwartz, was made before Federal Judge Robert Payne.

The claim was part of an elaborate effort to deny access to over 1,000 pages of information dealing with Shen and his so-called civilian organization, the Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense (COSTIND).

When the Clinton lawyers finished I, in turn, dropped a complete bio of Gen. Shen Roujun on Payne’s desk. The dossier on Shen included his current military status and details about COSTIND, the military unit he was in.

Shen was not only second in charge of COSTIND but the unit itself is run entirely by and for the Chinese army. It is charged with obtaining advanced military technology for Chinese nuclear weapons. To say that Payne was upset is an understatement. While many judges facing Clinton administration lawyers took lying for granted, Payne threatened to lock all of the U.S. government attorneys up and throw away the key if he did not have the 1,000 pages of withheld materials on his desk in 48 hours.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57450

Many of the techniques that made the Able Danger possible are now available to private data mining firms that
1) Republican party factions not affiliated with the various Presidential campaigns,
2) Conservative groups,
3) some bloggers and
4) the larger Conservative talk radio hosts,
can all now hire.

Hsu directly connects Hillary 2008 to that 1996 Chinese influence buying campaign for Clinton 1996.

Can you say “Swift Boat 2008?”

http://www.chinagatethemovie.com/

Are you ready for your close-up, Hillary?

It is happening right before our eyes.

Norman Hsu Scholarship. Endowed by Norman Hsu, a board member at

Eugene Lang College, this scholarship is awarded to students with a strong

academic recorrd

Eugene Lang College :: About :: Administration :: Board of …

Norman Hsu Daniel J. McSweeney Rodney W. Nichols Marylin Prince Malcolm B. Smith … 2007 The New School | Comments email to: webmaster@newschool.edu.
http://www.newschool.edu/lang/about.aspx?id=10014 – 57k – Cached – Similar pages – Note this

2006 Benefit Leadership

CO CHAIRS
American International Group, Inc. The Durst Organization
The Durst Organization
Robert R. Dyson, The Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corporation
Julien J. Studley, The Julien J. Studley Foundation
Daniel R. Tishman, Tishman Realty & Construction Co., Inc.

DINNER CHAIRS
Allen & Company, Paul A. Gould, Nancy B. Peretsman, and Philip Scaturro
Henry H. Arnhold, Arnhold and S. Bleichroeder Holdings, Inc.
ASM Mechanical Systems
Component Assembly Systems, Inc.
Paul W. Critchlow, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Mr. and Mrs. Michael E. Gellert
Mr. and Mrs. Robert F. Hoerle
Norman Hsu
Sheila C. Johnson
Permasteelisa Cladding Technologies, L.P.
Bernard and Irene Schwartz
Zwicker Electric Co., Inc.

 

Note carefully the linkage between Hsu and Schwartz, it is recurring and will become important down the line. 

+hsu +”new school” site:newschool.edu

Even that search comes up with a bunch of tidbits I have to look at.

Here is a capture of the original search result which doesn’t match the page content now.

Eugene Lang College :: Admissions :: Financing Your Education …
Eugene Lang College The New School for Liberal Arts Scholarships … Norman Hsu Scholarship. Endowed by Norman Hsu, a board member at Eugene Lang College, …
http://www.newschool.edu/lang/admissions.aspx?id=312 – 67k – Cached – Similar pages – Note this

The New School has basically purged any link to Hsu from their website. They even removed the mention of the scholarship they offered in his name off their financial assistance page.

BUT there still is a link they cant change due to laws of accounting standards they don’t want to touch.

Read the pdf file of their last year annual report, he is still listed there as being a new board member for the year the report was filed.

Next year it will be down the memory hole.

Ask yourself when was the last time you watched and listened to Howard Dean or Pelosi make fools of themselves. That is pure MSM Silence. They had a problem. They have eliminated it. The MSM is so powerful that Hillary can put Hsu on the Cabinet and the general public would never know a thing about him.

You don’t hear Howard’s mouth and yes, WaPo and NYT can make the connections……..but you will not see it 365 days as you did Abu Ghraib. No, it will be like that guy without a name to be found on the front page of the NYT. That little Berger guy.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57450

If WND can make these connections, so can WaPo and the NYTimes.

Sant S. Chatwal, an Indian American businessman, has helped raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaigns, even as he battled governments on two continents to escape bankruptcy and millions of dollars in tax liens.

The founder of the Bombay Palace restaurant chain, Chatwal is one of a growing number of fundraisers in the 2008 presidential campaign whose backgrounds have prompted questions about how much screening the candidates devote to their “bundlers” while they press to raise record amounts.