National Socialism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from National socialism)
Jump to: navigation, search
National Socialism may refer to:

Nazism, the political ideology of the National Socialist German Workers Party of the 1920s to 1940s
National Socialist Parties or groups before and after World War II that include numerous different organizations.
Strasserism
Austrian National Socialism
Socialism in one country

[edit] See also
National Socialist Party
National Socialist Movement
For National Socialist Ideology see Nazism#Ideology

National Socialism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from National socialism)
Jump to: navigation, search
National Socialism may refer to:

Nazism, the political ideology of the National Socialist German Workers Party of the 1920s to 1940s
National Socialist Parties or groups before and after World War II that include numerous different organizations.
Strasserism
Austrian National Socialism
Socialism in one country

[edit] See also
National Socialist Party
National Socialist Movement
For National Socialist Ideology see Nazism#Ideology

And it’s Bush’s fault!

Dumb ass moron leftist.

And let us not leave out the fact that Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker operated the Thyssen Bank (a Nazi bank) in New York City, selling Nazi bonds to finance Hitler all thru the 30′s, and that Bush family assets were seized in 1942 at the order of FDR for collaborating with the Nazis:

Roosevelt’s Alien Property Custodian, Leo T. Crowley, signed Vesting Order Number 248 seizing Bush’s property under the Trading with the Enemy Act. The order cited only the Union Banking Corporation (UBC), of which Bush was a director and held one share, which had connections with a Dutch bank owned by Thyssen. Fox News has reported that recently declassified material reveals that the 4,000 Union Banking shares owned by the Dutch bank were registered in the names of the seven U.S. directors, according to a document signed by Homer Jones, chief of the division of investigation and research of the Office of Alien Property Custodian, a World War II-era agency. [6]. By 1941 Thyssen no longer had control over his banking empire, which was in the hands of the Nazi government.

E. Roland Harriman–3991 shares (managed and under voting control of Prescott Bush)
Cornelis Lievense–4 shares (He was the New York banker of the Nazi Party)
Harold D. Pennington–1 share (Employed by Prescott Bush at Brown Brothers Harriman)
Ray Morris–1 share (a business partner of the Bush and Harriman families)
Prescott S. Bush–1 share (director of UBC, which was co-founded and sponsored by his father-in-law George Walker; senior managing

Get a clue.

Stalin needed to discredit Hitler. There really isn’t much difference between Communism and Nazism , the biggest difference is that Communism thought itself a universal movement for all humans where as Nazism was a movement for Germany.

So Stalin tried to discredit Nazism by saying it was a right-wing thing.. when in actuality the two systems are cousins and belong very much on the Left. It has nothing to do with who owned factories.. it has everything to do with making a false distinction between the Soviet Union and Germany.

Politically, you are correct. Hitler and Stalin were both socialists. I believe the reason that people call Stalin “Left” and Hitler “Right” is because of the econmic ownership of the countries they lead. Stalin’s Soviet Union owned the means of production. In Hitler’s Germany, the means of production was privately owned. I bring this up to point out that extremes are a problem. As with so many things in life, moderation is very important.

Politically, you are correct. Both Hitler and Stalin were socialist. I believe that the reason people consider Stalin “Left” and Hitler “Right” is because of economic theory. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, the means of production was owned by the state. In Hitler’s Germany, the means of production was privately owned. The overall point I was attempting to make is that the extremes are a problem. As with so many things in life, moderation is very important.

NY Representatives Received Anti-War Letters Before Times Square Blast
Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:37:57 pm PST

Before the bombing of a recruiting office in Times Square this morning, New York’s Congressional representatives received copies of a letter with photos of the recruiting office and the claim, “Happy New Year, We Did It.”

And a 10-page anti-war rant. Imagine my surprise.

WASHINGTON – Police are investigating letters that arrived Thursday at Capitol Hill offices containing a photo of the Times Square military recruiting office before it was bombed and including the claim “We Did It.”

The manila envelopes contained a photo of a man standing in front of the recruiting station, according to a Democratic aide who spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter is under investigation. The photo was the kind commonly sent as a holiday greeting card.

The message on the card: “Happy New Year, We Did It.”

The envelope also contained a packet of approximately 10 sheets of paper that seemed to be a political manifesto railing against the Iraq war and a booklet. The aide didn’t know what the booklet was.

Postal inspectors were at the Capitol investigating the letters alongside Capitol Police, U.S. Postal Inspection Service spokesman Douglas Bem said. He had no details about the letters’ content. A second law enforcement official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the case is ongoing, confirmed some of their contents as described by the Democratic aide.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of an e-mail from the office of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to other lawmakers Thursday that reads:

“A few offices on the House side have received a letter today addressed to ‘Members of Congress’ with a picture of a man standing in front of the Times Square recruiting station that was bombed in New York today with the statement ‘We did it.’ He is standing in front of it with his arms spread out and he’s attached his political manifesto.”

UPDATE at 3/6/08 5:41:21 pm:

The Kos Kids tried to do some advance damage control on this one: Daily Kos: Times Square Bombing: ‘Left-Wing Terrorism’ Smear Coming.

He was very much pro animal rights.

Didn’t know that, did you?

Did you actually read Jonah’s book? Or just listened to the TV interviews?

As for Jonah Goldberg and his fantasy of Nazi liberals – the Nazis were by no means socialist – they were a corporatist authoritarian totalitarian fascist regime. Go to an encyclopedia and look up fascism:

Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole. Fascists seek to forge a type of national unity, usually based on (but not limited to) ethnic, cultural, racial, religious attributes. Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: patriotism, nationalism, statism, militarism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, corporatism, populism, collectivism, autocracy and opposition to political and economic liberalism

Jonah’s book describes and defines almost the definition that you provided. He does equate nationalism, statism, militarism, communism, populism, totalitarianism, collectivism, autocracy and opposition to political and economic liberalism.

An almost perfect match.

Obviously, soothsayer, you have not taken the time to read Jonah’s book.

Your fact template leads you to false generalizations.

Left by AJStrata on March 6th, 2008

Geez… Did you even read the book or listen to Jonah describe his book?

He’s not calling today liberals fascists. So it’s interesting you should find his non-claim to be over the top. Just how did you come to this conclusion?

See Bruce Walker’s analysis for the marxist nature of Natzism.

Sooth, you buy into all the stereotypes of the Left.