<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists: Liars Or Fools?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; al-Qaeda&#8217;s Zawahiri And Saddam Hussein Were Planning Attacks</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-342839</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; al-Qaeda&#8217;s Zawahiri And Saddam Hussein Were Planning Attacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-342839</guid>
		<description>[...] to al-Qaeda, when in fact the report the SurrenderMedia was trying to cover said just the opposite. As I noted at the time the analysis showed Saddam Hussein had long time ties with Ayman Zawahiri, who at the time ran the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to al-Qaeda, when in fact the report the SurrenderMedia was trying to cover said just the opposite. As I noted at the time the analysis showed Saddam Hussein had long time ties with Ayman Zawahiri, who at the time ran the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 75</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-297207</link>
		<dc:creator>75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-297207</guid>
		<description>Liars AND fools, AJ...liars and fools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liars AND fools, AJ&#8230;liars and fools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWS</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-296898</link>
		<dc:creator>WWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-296898</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t &quot;fix&quot; it.  You find reliable sources, stick with them, let  your friends and family know about them, and let the traditional newsprint outfits die a long deserved death.

I see a future - maybe 20 years from now - where there are maybe 3 or 4 daily papers with national coverage left in the U.S.  Everyone else will be on the net.  

Purely local news outlets will survive a while longer, although most of them will probably move to a weekly format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t &#8220;fix&#8221; it.  You find reliable sources, stick with them, let  your friends and family know about them, and let the traditional newsprint outfits die a long deserved death.</p>
<p>I see a future &#8211; maybe 20 years from now &#8211; where there are maybe 3 or 4 daily papers with national coverage left in the U.S.  Everyone else will be on the net.  </p>
<p>Purely local news outlets will survive a while longer, although most of them will probably move to a weekly format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karon von Gerhke</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-296891</link>
		<dc:creator>Karon von Gerhke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-296891</guid>
		<description>Both commentators, Crosspatch and Mark-for-Senate, have barely touched the periphery. Fact: Editors rely on news wire giants Reuters and the Associated Press. If it not on the wires it doesn&#039;t get published. For an eye opener, revisit the news wires and watch the spin that unfolds in the national media as the liberal ideologues of mainstream media craftily distort the mere blurbs--no there word for what comes off the wires than a &quot;blurb&quot;-- into the editorialized propaganda of their overseers, their editorial boards. 

Journalists do not report the news. They editorialize the news and report their editorialize spin as fact versus opinion. Begs the question: The public&#039;s right to know WHAT? The right-wing biased opinion of their editorial boards!  

Yes, there &quot;ought&quot; to be a law. But there isn&#039;t. Until there is, we owe a debt to the emergence of the Strata-Sphere&#039;s of this world for their balanced reasoned analyses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both commentators, Crosspatch and Mark-for-Senate, have barely touched the periphery. Fact: Editors rely on news wire giants Reuters and the Associated Press. If it not on the wires it doesn&#8217;t get published. For an eye opener, revisit the news wires and watch the spin that unfolds in the national media as the liberal ideologues of mainstream media craftily distort the mere blurbs&#8211;no there word for what comes off the wires than a &#8220;blurb&#8221;&#8211; into the editorialized propaganda of their overseers, their editorial boards. </p>
<p>Journalists do not report the news. They editorialize the news and report their editorialize spin as fact versus opinion. Begs the question: The public&#8217;s right to know WHAT? The right-wing biased opinion of their editorial boards!  </p>
<p>Yes, there &#8220;ought&#8221; to be a law. But there isn&#8217;t. Until there is, we owe a debt to the emergence of the Strata-Sphere&#8217;s of this world for their balanced reasoned analyses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garrettc</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-296881</link>
		<dc:creator>garrettc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-296881</guid>
		<description>And of course we know that the educational elite, are among the most resistent to self analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course we know that the educational elite, are among the most resistent to self analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garrettc</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-296880</link>
		<dc:creator>garrettc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-296880</guid>
		<description>Well, look how goes to journalism schools.  It is not the jhard driving students that want to be physcians, lawyers, engineers or scientists.  The problem of shoddy reporting, poor grasp of facts, and poor analytical ability lies first in the pool selection and secondly in the utter lack of rigour in the education of journalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, look how goes to journalism schools.  It is not the jhard driving students that want to be physcians, lawyers, engineers or scientists.  The problem of shoddy reporting, poor grasp of facts, and poor analytical ability lies first in the pool selection and secondly in the utter lack of rigour in the education of journalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark_for_Senate</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-296870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark_for_Senate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-296870</guid>
		<description>The big question is... How do we fix this?  This shoddy DNC journalism has been going on for decades.  I&#039;m thinking of contacting the FEC, but even if charges could be proven, I doubt that any fines or punishment would be large enough to decapitate the business, but I believe it needs to be done.  Perhaps a class-action type suit for &#039;libel, defamation of character of the United States&#039; could have a chance?  Just choose one first (NYT would be a good choice), I believe in just the last 6 years there are thousands of examples of mis-leading or outright false stories.  Something needs to be done so that the general public has a chance to get accurate information about what is occurring in the world, since liberals have proven to be &#039;not connected&#039; to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big question is&#8230; How do we fix this?  This shoddy DNC journalism has been going on for decades.  I&#8217;m thinking of contacting the FEC, but even if charges could be proven, I doubt that any fines or punishment would be large enough to decapitate the business, but I believe it needs to be done.  Perhaps a class-action type suit for &#8216;libel, defamation of character of the United States&#8217; could have a chance?  Just choose one first (NYT would be a good choice), I believe in just the last 6 years there are thousands of examples of mis-leading or outright false stories.  Something needs to be done so that the general public has a chance to get accurate information about what is occurring in the world, since liberals have proven to be &#8216;not connected&#8217; to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193/comment-page-1#comment-296866</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5193#comment-296866</guid>
		<description>The way I understand it, one media outlet &quot;leaked&quot; an improper conclusion before the report was released and everyone ran with that.  Then when the report actually came out, it said something completely different than the &quot;leaked&quot; report said but since that report was already &quot;old news&quot; by that time, nobody carried the correct story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I understand it, one media outlet &#8220;leaked&#8221; an improper conclusion before the report was released and everyone ran with that.  Then when the report actually came out, it said something completely different than the &#8220;leaked&#8221; report said but since that report was already &#8220;old news&#8221; by that time, nobody carried the correct story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

