Search

A few updates from the war on terror. Seems allied forces have been busy over the weekend. In Iraq a large number of terrorists have been killed, and nearly twice that number have been killed in Afghanistan. Strangely (or maybe not), the liberal media is all upset that our systemic killing of Taliban commanders is creating an army of younger leaders:

The Taliban leadership in southern Afghanistan is passing into the hands of younger, more extreme insurgents as the relentless targeting of traditional commanders by British forces takes its toll.

In a week spent in Helmand province, The Daily Telegraph has found widespread evidence that special forces operations are degrading the Taliban’s leadership and its ability to co-ordinate operations.

But there are also indications of increasing radicalisation within the Taliban as more extreme fighters, many of them al-Qa’eda-linked foreign militants, fill the gaps left when experienced Taliban leaders are killed.

Western military officials say privately that approximately 200 medium and high-level Taliban commanders were killed countrywide in targeted bombings or assassinations by American and British special forces last year, and a further 100 captured.

Using local intermediaries, the Telegraph was able to meet two mid-level Taliban commanders in the provincial capital Lashkargar. Both claimed that the Taliban was increasingly recruited from outside Helmand and that its hierarchies were becoming far less clear cut.

Clearly we are decimating the terrorist leaders to the point locals no longer run the fighters, which is probably why more locals are being killed and there is a rising resentment with the Islamo Fascists in the region. This is how al-Qaeda lost Iraq, foreigners killing Iraqi Muslims.

Moreover, the fact we are taking out their senior and experienced leaders and they are being replaced by less-wise, more reckless younger folks not familiar with the region and locality is not a bad thing. Hitler did the same thing in the waning days of the 3rd Reich - it did not slow the destruction of the Nazi movement, just as this won’t slow the destruction of radical Islam.

And on a matter which I started picking up on last July and then again last fall (check here and here for examples) we find that there is, in fact, permission for US Special Forces to hunt down key targets in Pakistan:

The Musharraf regime has indirectly approved the US Drone (pilotless plane) attacks on Al Qaeda targets in tribal areas of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan.

Since January, missiles have been fired from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operated Predator drones and have hit at least three suspected hideouts of Islamic militants, including a strike on March 16 in Toog village in South Waziristan that left 20 dead.

Sources said that the recent wave of Predator attacks are the result of Musharrafs understanding with the US officials and other top Pakistanis which gave Washington virtually unrestricted authority to hit targets in the border areas.

Sorry Barack, we won’t have to actually invade Pakistan if you become President! There are our allies, and acting like it.

On a more positive note, more Afghan children are in school these days:

Afghanistan’s Education Minister, Khanif Atmar, has revealed that Afghani children are now attending school in record numbers.

Mr Atmar has given the figure of nearly seven million children enrolling for new school year classes.

It is believed numbers in the coming year will show a third of the pupils are girls who were banned from attending the classroom under the Taliban regime, which was ousted in the US-led invasion in 2001.

Now that is clearly a brighter future for Afghanis, and clearly the families are participating in this new feature of Afghan life since they are sending their girls to school. No wonder the Taliban was recently ejected from Islam in a religious fatwa released from the Pak tribal areas.

It seems to me al-Qaeda is also on the ropes, given the recent pronouncements from Bin Laden and now Zawahiri:

A new statement attributed to al Qaeda’s No. 2 figure, Ayman al-Zawahiri, calls on Muslims to attack Western interests in defense of the Palestinians in Gaza.

Let us strike their interests everywhere, just as they gathered against us from everywhere, and let them know that every dollar they spend on the killing of Muslims, there will be shed blood instead in return,” the speaker in the nearly five-minute statement says.

No more trying to save Iraq or Afghanistan. AQ is going back to the tried and true (and well worn) call to arms against Israel. One item that is telling about AQ is the line I highlighted. The image it conveys is one of a movement surrounded and being pummeled. This may be an accidental exposure of the feelings of AQ right now.

I think the biggest mistake AQ made was retreating its forces to the tribal areas of Pakistan to regroup. Because now there is a noose around the area with 80,000 Pakistani forces around the southern edge of the region and some 30,000 NATO fighting forces along the norther edge in Afghanistan. And there are a couple hundred US and UK Special Forces personnel hunting the bad guys inside the tribal region.

Surrounded and begging for help - that is AQ. And with Islamic sects now going on record with fatwas claiming the Taliban are now out of Islam due to their atrocities (and possibly foreign leaders), it will not be much longer before Islam decides AQ should join them and is also expelled from Islam. These Islamo Fascists are not the future of Islam - they are its enemies. And the Muslim community is awakening to that fact quite rapidly.

63 Responses to “Updates On The War On Terror 03_24_08”

My God this adminstration sucks

US To Help Egypt Build Border Fence

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7010409049

Cairo, Egypt (AHN) - The United States has announced that it is planning to help Egypt build a border fence along the Gaza-Egypt border. Washington transferred $23 million worth of special aid to the North African nation as part of its assistance in locating smuggling tunnels.

….

The planned fence between Egypt and Gaza will employ technology directed at preventing the fence from being damaged

The American Army Corps of Engineers plans to send teams to Egypt to help push forward the border fence plans.

===========

So let me get this right… we’re sending them millions of dollars AND The ACOE to get them a fence up and running quickly

WHAT ABOUT OUR BORDER

God damn it.

Vince - the Gaza-Eqypt border is only 7.5 miles long, with no detours or alternate routes available that are not heavily patrolled. (Ocean monitored by Isreali gunboats, etc)

That’s a realistic, practical length for a fence - don’t forget that an effective fence has to be continually manned at *all* points (guardhouses and troops available every 100 feet, for example) for it to be a realistic barrier that can’t be breached. Tech is great, but unless the men are there and stay there it can be beaten.

The US-Mexico border is nearly 200o miles, with dozens if not hundreds of easily available ways around it.

Fencing off Gaza from Egypt? A reasonable, achievable project. The US Mexican border? Another wall of Great China that will never work even if the entire US military budget for the next 20 years is poured into it.

Not to mention that the Gaza fence is meant to keep out *real* terrorists and *real* weapons, not just people with brown skin who don’t talk right.

Not to mention that the Gaza fence is meant to keep out *real* terrorists and *real* weapons, not just people with brown skin who don’t talk right.

Piss off. Don’t call me a racist. Who the hell do you think you are

Not to mention that the Gaza fence is meant to keep out *real* terrorists and *real* weapons, not just people with brown skin who don’t talk right.

Piss off. Don’t call me a racist. Who the hell do you think you are

The”Fence” has no other purpose than that. Or tell me how many terrorist attacks have been launched in this country by people who’ve come across the mexican border.

If it’s really about terrorism, then the money and effort is far better spent in other places, not in a bottomless cement lined ditch that will do nothing.

heh.. he calls me a racist and thinks I’m just going to have a conversation with him.

WWS: Here, why dont you these folks racists too. Why stop there. maybe you can call them Nazis as well

It’s a shame that in the dangerous world we live in… that peolpe with such backward thinking as you are preventing us from protecting ourselves. And for what?

http://counterterrorismblog.org/2008/03/danger_signs_on_the_border.php

Danger Signs on the Border
By Douglas Farah

A tip of the hat (actually, two tips) to Todd Bensman of the San Antonio Express-News for two articles (one in his paper and one one his website)
on the reality that Islamist terrorists have crossed the U.S. border, and are likely to do so again.

Bensman is one of the few investigative journalists left with a staff job who takes these investigations seriously. As much of newspaper world, in particular, slash their investigative capabilities, these gems will grow ever more rare.

Bensman looks at the recent case of three Afghanistan national with genuine Mexican passports seeking to enter the United States. The good news is that the Mexicans are willing and able partners in investigating these potential breaches. The bad news is that they nonetheless had real passports, which makes getting caught much harder.

In his other story Bensman looks at the 10 cases of terrorists who made it across the border, including al Qaeda, Hezbollah and Hamas operatives. This is the first time I have seen the cases laid out in some detail and linked to terrorist groups.

What is of greater concern to me than Mexico, per se, as I have written earlier, is the number of Latin American countries where terrorists and their sympathizers, particularly but not limited to Hezbollah, can likely acquire legitimate travel documents that do not arouse much suspicion. My full blog is here.

March 24, 2008 10:53 AM Print

Vince,
WWS makes the assumption that no terrorists have or ever will cross over the Mexico border simply because no attack has occurred here. Some would call that being extremely naive, others would call it stupidity…take your pick.

As usual the racism charge comes out when attempting to stop an argument. Very dishonest…

AJ,
Another great post at Gateway Pundit

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/03/gen-petraeus-iran-behind-yesterdays.html

If it’s not about race - then why is no one - NO ONE - screaming about fencing off the Canadian border? There are far more moslems in Canada than in Mexico, and it’s already much easier to get across the Canadian border than the Mexican border. The Canadian border is mostly accessible, while the Mexican border is mostly inaccessible desert. The Canadian border is a much greater security threat than the Mexican border has ever been.

So why doesn’t anyone care? Other than the fact that most Canadians are the “right” color and most mexicans aren’t?

Piss off. Like I have to prove i’m not a racist.

Vince:

You are such a dick sometimes. This administration sucks? My God Vince that damn border has never had a fence. Never…not in 140 years.

And this administration has put more people and more resources on that border than any administration in history. And it is building the fence, but this is not a fascist country and when people on the border from private property owners to mayors to sheriffs have dragged the government into court to slow down and/or stop that parts of that fence we can not just shoot them. Much as you might want to.

The other day I saw a story about Colorado, it said that the farmers were facing a crop failure from a lack of labor. Now I heard hardliners say that we did not need these people, that Americans could do all this work and besides that the borders were still wide open. Well, it seems like some people are not coming in, because they had to send convicts out to work the fields up there.

But your attitude sucks and no one is calling you a racist.

And you know what? There is no way to completely close our borders, if you look at the coastline we are talking about a lot more than 2,000 miles.

And besides all that what is wrong with the US trying to help with a fence at Gaza? That is how the last suicide bombers got into Israel. I keep hearing some people say that the US has betrayed the Israelis because Rice supports the peace process…well this might actually help save some Israelis’ lives.

I’m entitled to my opinion. This adminstration sucks. Every other country in this world gets their emergencies taken care of.. but we have one down there and nothing is going on.

And your big counter-argument is “we can’t completely close our borders”.

Duh.. No kidding. The sky is blue, did you know that?

WWS,
The Canadian border requires no fence because illegals are not flooding across it. Do you require a dam at every river regardless of how much water flows down it?

Vince,
While I don’t completely agree with everything you say I do admire your passion for your point of view. Unfortunately as usual many have to resort to name calling when challenged…

And Terrye,
I could care less about 140 years ago. The same threats to our country didn’t exist then… But of course, let’s all put our heads in the sand because we can’t change something that’s been one way for 140 years!

WWS,
Gee, when was the last time that Canadians were caught coming across the border in military vehicles and getting into firefights with our northern border agents. I guess there’s a flood of people attempting to enter from the north as there are from the southern borders but we’re just not hearing about it? The northern border is an issue just as the southern border and as all borders will be. But border security isn’t just about keeping terrorists out. That’s only one element in a very complex issue. The southern border creates different issues that the northern border does. To say that it’s only about the color of ones skin is insulting.

I am not talking about what happened 140 years ago, I am talking about a situation that has been going on for 140 years. No one raised hell back in 2000 when Bush was running, it was not a big deal. No one made an issue in 2004, and then all of sudden it is an emergency?

My ass.

And name one country in the world that could have or would have built a 2,000 mile fence in a year and a half.

And I have got a right to my opinion too. And my opinion is that because a bunch of pissy conservatives could not get everything they wanted when they wanted and the way they wanted it, they turned on this administration and made it that much more possible for a freaking socialist to win the next election..

And those conservatives did that knowing full well that they could never win an election themselves. Knowing full well, that unless those moderates and Independents they obviously have no respect for vote for their guy they can not POSSIBLY win on their own.

So, they vote for a guy and then when he does not say how high when they say jump…they stab him in the back.

And this crap about Bush sucking because he is helping to build a 7.5 mile fence in Gaza is just the kind of stupidity I am talking about.

Terrye, your government hasn’t been handing out freebies for 140 years. Taxpayer funded social welfare is a fairly recent trend so it’s not much of a stretch in logic to see why the illegal numbers are growing so exponentially.

75:

These guys are talking about terrorists, not just illegals. Like the terrorist that was stopped at the Canadian border back in 99 as he was coming here to blow something up.

And they are building that fence on the southern border, just not fast enough for some people.

75:

Oh please, those migrants have been coming here for years to work.

And what the hell do freebies have to do with this anyway.

AJ does a story on terrorism and then Vince does a snotty little post about how Bush sucks because our government is going to help seal a 7 mile border in Gaza or some such nonsense and the next thing you know we are talking about freebies etc.

Screw this.

Terrye, freebies are what draw the large numbers of illegals. Yes, we’ve always had migrants but never near these kinds of numbers and certainly not these level of illegals. And it’s these large numbers that put a strain on catching the terrorist infiltrators so obviously, these are related problems.

75,
Once a liberal always a liberal…they’ll never get the freebie connection.

Terrye,

“Oh please, those migrants have been coming here for years to work.”

Like I said, since it’s been going on for years let’s just accept it then, right? Nothings changed, right?

You don’t see the connection between the border issue, freebies, Vince’s feelings about the government, a border in Gaza and terrorism. You are entitled to that opinion. For those of us who do see those connections and many more we are also entitled to ours.

Screw that.

No one made an issue in 2004, and then all of sudden it is an emergency?

Did you know me in 2004? Wow. such arrogance. I’ve been complaining about it since 2001.

AJ does a story on terrorism and then Vince does a snotty little post about how Bush sucks because our government is going to help seal a 7 mile border in Gaza or some such nonsense and the next thing you know we are talking about freebies etc.

Bush does suck. We have our own border problem with Terrorist., they passed a law to build the fense and they aren’t doing it.

But somehow they could find the political will to throw all kinds money at Egypt and send in the Army Corp of Enigenners there ASAP. It seems like when it comes to the Arabs, we’re johnny on the spot and can’t jump high enough.

Crap like this is why conservatives aren’t even listening to Bush anymore and if it wasn’t for the disasterous Democrats and the total ruination this country would suffer if one of them got elected, they wouldn’t be voting for McAmnesty either.

Vince,

I’m usually with you most of the time but I think comparing the Egyptian/Gaza border situation to our own with Mexico is a bit of a stretch. Don’t get me wrong, I agree that Bush isn’t exactly conservative and certainly isn’t regarding the Mexican border situation. He is from Texas, after all. But I can’t go so far as to say Bush “sucks”. Just my two cents but there a lot of other factors besides he and his administration that are dragging their feet on a border fence, not the least of which is an entire party of half our nation eager to add millions of illegal voters to their rolls.

A must read at the “freerepublic”

On the verge of victory
The war in Iraq promises to remake the Middle East
Sunday, March 23, 2008
By Jack Kelly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Kathie, pleased correct me if I’m wrong but is not this paper one of Rush’s favorites?

75: I’ve become totally alienated from Bush.

It’s a sad state of affairs when someone I really wanted to succeed is such a failure.. and I do think he failed. And whats’ really tragic is that he’s probably going to be the best thing have for a while, because I have no hope the next president is going to be any better.

Just because Bush is better than the alternatives, it doesn’t mean there is anything objecitvely great about the way things are..

Kathie,
That was a great read…but they always have to throw in their critisicms of President Bush…my favorite being the one about the cost being higher because of the blunders made in prosecuting the war. I wish they would tell us exactly which wars have been prosecuted perfectly…of course they can’t because they don’t exist, but that have to throw that piece of meat to the wolves. I guess it thinks it gives them some kind of credibility.

I dont think there will be any victory in Iraq until the regime in Iran is crushed.

Just think how much better the US would be strategically if we would have focused our resources on Afganistan and Pakistan in the first place.

Vince, I agree that “better than the alternatives” isn’t ideal but I don’t think he’s a failure by any means. I think he’s “strayed” from the conservative cause far less frequently than the conventional wisdom says. For the most part, I’m still in his corner. It’s very difficult for any president in his last term to get things done, especially one who’s taken the beating this one has. We’ll all be better because of him, certainly not despite him but that being said…prepare yourself for our next president. We’ll all be remembering the Bush days in a far more favorable light. I’m certain of that.

75….I don’t know if it is one of Rush’s favorites. I thought that Jack explained just how complicated this war is. To difficult for sound bites. It was always a risky war but given the many facts that few in the public domain knew much about because we are not privy to the NIE I think it was the right decision. The senators knew what the NIE said. They voted for the war. Because of secrecy they can say anything now, like Bush lied. About risky…….it may work for the world benefit it may not, but it is worth the try. That was the decision the President had to make in the wake of 911. I think there are few Presidents that have had the courage of this President.

Kathie,
Amen.

Vince,
Is your “Total alienation” from Bush all about Mexican immigration?

75,
Your response to WWS was no response. The northern border remains a threat, regardless of the number of illegals currently exploiting each border.

Whippeti…I don’t get why the dems are talking about the costs, which have been enormous granted. This is how I see it. The costs of 911 were in the neighborhood of 1 trillion, maybe more. I think that if my home were in danger, let’s say I might loose it for some reason, I do everything to keep it. I give up dinners out, I shop at Target, I buy only essential foods, I turn down the heat, conserve on water etc. But the dems don’t get it. Their answer to terrorism is forget it. They belittle those who protect us, disconnect the dots, up domestic programs like free education, free medical care, etc. I think you protect your home because with out it nothing else matters.

Kathie,
Because the Dems don’t really care about your home. They only care about theirs. Since they have convinced themselves that they are the only ones who care about others they can spend all of our money to help those they feel are “needy.” The more people they buy off in this manner the more votes they receive and the longer their term in office.

They believe that since they “care” in this manner that it doesn’t really matter what threats may come to the U.S. because no one will harm them since they are so “caring.”

If for some unforseen (in their minds) reason those who may want to harm us do find their way here they believe they are safe because they’ve spent so much time, effort and money defending them.

It’s all Bush’s and the evil Republican’s fault. And they believe that socialist and communist societies are the more perfect ones. Damn the history that shows otherwise.

Other than that it’s all about power and they’ll do whatever it takes to get it and whatever it takes to keep it once they have it. The ends justify the means…

Coral,
How much better would we be strategically and why?

Vince,
Is your “Total alienation” from Bush all about Mexican immigration?

Left by The Macker on March 24th, 2008

No. It was about his insistance that the Senate reconsider the Immigration bill in June after it had been rejected in May.

The People were clear.. we didn’t want that law, and yet he didn’t care and had us go through a whole other round of fighting with teh Senate to kill it again.

That was the last straw.

If you want to know all the other reasons, check otu my comments here

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5159

Coral thinks we should have ignored the fact that AQ was moving into Iraq after we destroyed their nest in Afghanistan.

Vince,
Just what I was thinking!

So Vince has been whining about the immigration “emergency” since 2001. Golly, 7 whole years have passed and the President of the United States still has not done Vince’s bidding. The truth is Vince ignores the fact that Bush has still done more than anyone else.

And Bush’s attitudes toward immigration today are the same ones he had back in 2000 when he took office. And like Vince, the President has a right to his opinion too.

But go ahead, root for Tancredo, be one of his 1%, see where that gets you.

I’ve ignored nothing. It’s not enough Terrye.

Who knows how many islamists have poured into the country from down there.

When thousands of people are dead are you going to console them with “well George did more than Nixon did”

And Bush’s attitudes toward immigration today are the same ones he had back in 2000 when he took office.

Not good enough. 9/11 changed everything … and nothing.

When are we going to take our enemy seriously? We didn’t until 9/11 and we still haven’t.

There is massive corruption on the Southern border. And in some towns it’s a war zone. The Federal Government is a complete failure down there.

But go ahead, root for Tancredo, be one of his 1%, see where that gets you.

Oh Little Miss Spiteful: he’s not running for office, didn’t you hear?

Kathie,
I wrote a comment but it never showed up so I’ll try again…sorry if it comes up twice!

The Dems don’t care about your home they only care about theirs. If yours has to go in order for theirs to survive, then so be it.

They believe that if you just “care” enough about the plight of the terrorist then they won’t harm you. Of course this thinking goes against all sane thought since innocents seem to be the terrorists favorite target…people doing nothing other than trying to survive.

Their biggest concern is the money that could be better spent on all of those programs that buy off huge segments of the population to insure future votes for their party. They need people dependent on them for their party’s survival. And they will make you and I pay for it.

Ultimately it’s all about power. They want it and they will do anything to get it and even more to keep it. Nothing is out of bounds to them. The ends justifies the means…..

“And name one country in the world that could have… built a 2,000 mile fence in a year and a half. “

The United States of America.

Who knows how many terrorists have walked here from British Columbia either?

I know you think I am an ass kisser,you made a point of telling me that. But I am not paranoid and I do know that there have not been any terrorist attacks in this country since September 11. Now if invading two countries is not a signal that we take our enemy seriously I do not know what is.

Meanwhile you just go ahead hating Bush for not doing the politically and physically impossible. See where it gets you.

And there is a reason Tancredo is not running. Most people think the man is a Loon.

Browngreengold:

Says who? Really? Should we shoot the landowners? Bulldoze the towns in the way? Bring back the draft to get the man power? Bring about a coup to overthrow the Congress to get the money?

It is like Katrina and the aftermath when people just could not understand why a little thing like a Category 5 Hurricane should shut down a city. So what if the roads were under water? Just go in, get the people, clean up the mess and rebuild the city.

Voila!

Now on the border it is go in build the fence, shoot the drug dealers, round up the illegals..

Voila~!

AQ was never moving into Iraq. That’s just a story people who supported Bush’s war like to tell themselves. Just like the moving motive for going in in the first place. Saddam hated Bin Laden. No connection between AQ and 9/11, and Iraq. Wolforitz quotes Bush’s desire to fight in Iraq well before 9/11.

Finishing AQ and the Taliban off in Afghanistan would weakened AQ influence in the rest of the world. We could have bought ourselves time to improve our intelligence. For 5yrs Bin Laden gets to laugh in the US’s face. Talk about letting the enemy cry victory.

Coral,

“AQ was never moving into Iraq. That’s just a story people who supported Bush’s war like to tell themselves. Just like the moving motive for going in in the first place. Saddam hated Bin Laden. No connection between AQ and 9/11, and Iraq. Wolforitz quotes Bush’s desire to fight in Iraq well before 9/11. ”

Sounds like you’re reading from a Moveon press release…
Bush’s war? You really need to educate yourself more. And so what if Saddam hated Bin Laden? Like enemies have never banded together for a common goal. Maybe no connection to AQ and 9/11 but there is a well documented connection between AQ and Iraq.

News flash…AQ is in other places in the world other than Afganistan, Pakistan and Iraq and their sources of income are spread throughout the world, including the United States. If you think that this war will be over when AQ is gone from those three countries you are woefully naive. Will they be broken and battered? Yes. But as long as there are sympathizers out there they will exist and will be attempting to regroup and the killing will continue.

I love how Terrye makes it like our country is incapable of doing anything.

It’s a freakin fense.

Tell every bordering county to get it done in 6 months and it would be done

Or terrye do you think they’re going to use the same crew from California to Texas? LOL

Who knows how many terrorists have walked here from British Columbia either?

God damn it ,, you’re right.

Lets just charter planes for Al Qaeda.. Welcome them here.

Don’t do a damn thing. Because terrye says it’s not 100%.
Right? If it aint 100%, then leave the freakin door open.

Coral: If you actually go beyond the lies of the MSM, you would know the truth..

Spare me your propaganda.

I have a news story from ABC News from 1999 about links between Al Qaeda and Iraq

http://home.comcast.net/~vincep312

It’s teh bottom-most video

Vince,
To some here it’s a lot more than a freakin fence…

Coral said:

AQ was never moving into Iraq. That’s just a story people who supported Bush’s war like to tell themselves.

Please do us all a favor, Coral, and read the Pentagon Report IV in full before more comments like above. It will save everyone a lot of time bringing you up to speed. If you don’t want to make it thru the full 94 pages, concentrate on Volume II and the Conclusion. That will give you a brief overview of facts. Please strive to be more than media headline educated.

Now, off topic to the fence thread and pertinent to AJ’s posting…. These are Pakistan tribal leaders, and they may well be referring to Mehsud Baitullah’s Taliban of Pakistan, and not the original Mulla Omar’s Taliban.

The rifts between old and neo-Taliban (infiltrated with AQ fighters who left Iraq, among other places) have been going on since last fall, and deepening. Mehsud’s not winning any hearts and minds in Pakistan either. So no matter which Taliban they refer to, the increasing amount of Muslims that are no longer viewing the jihad movement as heroes is certainly a quiet triumph - a success that the media chooses to overlook.

It is a sign of success in the “hearts and minds” category.

The fence is a false sense of security. And frankly, I don’t like the idea of the United States of America have a big wall around it.

Fix the Immigration department. Make it efficient. I have a Canadian friend who married an Alabama boy. Took her 10 years to get her citizenship. She is an outstanding person. Ridiculous to take that long.

Have surveillance from satellites 24/7. Have a virtual fence. Have more border security. But a fence? Not the answer, imho.

Clarification… the comments about the Taliban, Pakistani version, relates to which Taliban AJ refers to INRE his “ejection” from Islam news.

The rift between old and neo Taliban is ongoing, and has been for awhile, in the Afghanistan Taliban.

IVEHADIT: So how are you going to stop Islamic Terrorists without a barrier wall?

Macker, sorry for the delayed response but the Canadian border is far less of a threat than the Mexican border simply because Canadians are more in tune to the dangers of terrorism than the Mexican government is. Not to mention the vast numbers coming from Mexico as opposed to Canada makes it far more likely that terrorists could slip through the south. Using equal resources for different threat levels would be very unsound.

Hi Vince,
The problem with the wall is that many of the terrorists know how to get visas, etc. *legally*. A wall would not stop them. They are being aided by traitors who show them how to beat our system, imho. Nothing can stop a traitor except all of us being on alert at all times to anything fishy….It’s what makes this enemy so insipid, imho. Technology and the hate-America crowd are gunning to take us down…not because it would improve their lives, just bring America down. Sick, sick people in this world. And I include many liberal Leftist democrats in that group. They have a mental disorder, imho.

IVE: It’s already been established that many Arab terrorists have in fact entered teh country by illegally crossing the southern border.

What they do is fly to one of the Central American countries and work their way North.

So much for the idea of hiring a bunch more Border Guards and get some camerass.. The govt is too incompetent.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,341532,00.html

U.S. Border Patrol Cracking Under Pressure to Find New Recruits

A mandate to hire 6,000 new border agents by the end of 2008 has lowered qualification tests, concentrated four months of training into 10 weeks and is raising concerns that recruits won’t get the proper training they need to protect the borders.

Richard Pierce, executive vice president of the National Border Patrol Council, a union that represents 11,000 rank-and-file agents, said the guidelines don’t allow time for proper training of new agents.

“The field training program is largely computer-based … it’s not the hands-on approach this job requires,” Pierce said. “When they get in field, they don’t have the basic information required.”

In May 2006, President Bush outlined a plan to increase the border protection force by 50 percent, from 12,000 agents to 18,000. In an effort to speed up the training process, the Border Patrol academy has condensed 88 days of basic training into 55, which would get boots on the ground at a much greater pace.

By October 1, half of all Border Patrol agents will have less than two years of experience, says Pierce. “So essentially, what we have is trainee agents teaching trainees out in the field.”

Pierce said that along with the youth factor, the agency could be taking on an aging force as well. “The Border Patrol has raised its entry-level age from 37 to 40,” he says, which would make for a retirement age of close to 60 for agents in the field. “This is not a job for a 60-year old, I can assure you,” he says.

According to the Border Patrol’s website, the academy no longer requires a high school diploma or GED for entrance, and passing test grades have been lowered from 85 percent to 70.

Background checks are another concern. Pierce said the Border Patrol is farming the work out to private contractors and no longer using the FBI, which is more thorough but also more time-consuming.

“The Border Patrol is using contract employees right now to do background investigations, where it used to use FBI agents,” Pierce said. “The contract program isn’t even finished before the employee is hired. We have employees in the academy who have not completed background checks.”

Deputy Chief of Border Patrol Ronald Colburn disagrees. “We’re doing a great job of both quality training of the personnel that we deploy and of checking on their backgrounds,” he argues. “That said, does one or can one slip through the cracks, as they say? Yes.”

Colburn concedes the plan presents some problems, such as an increased youth force. “When I surveyed the field … and talked to the top leadership, what concerned them most, it really was the youthfulness and the inexperience that we were deploying into the field.”

But he said that the increased number of agents will ultimately mean safer and better protected borders.

Not so, said Pierce. As pressure on the border continues and as worries mount that some new recruits aren’t suited for the job, Pierce is clear in his appraisal: “The Border Patrol is going to pay a price for this in the long run.”

TrackBack URI

Something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.