Apr 15 2008
Jimmuh Goes On Surrender Tour Of Mideast To Remind America Why Not To Vote Dem This Year
Man, is Jimmy Carter really a GOP Mole working undercover all these decades? His one term debacle as President launched much of the Islamo Fascist terrorist movement we see today. But his policies brought us Ronald Reagan and the conservative movement for two decades (minus a small nostalgic dalliance with the Dems from 1992-1994 and 2006-2008). Carter and Clinton did more to make the right look good, by comparison, than most people appreciate.
And here Carter is again out on the road reminding Americans what a Surrendercrat does – he coddles and legitimizes brutal terrorists by giving them audience, with full physical embrace (as well as political embrace through his presence):
Former President Jimmy Carter embraced a leading Hamas figure Tuesday, according to participants in a meeting that infuriated Israeli officials already upset by Carter’s freelance Mideast peace mission.
Carter also laid a wreath at the grave of Yasser Arafat, whom the Bush administration and many Israelis blame for the breakdown of peace talks seven years ago and the violence that followed.At a reception in the West Bank town of Ramallah organized by Carter’s office, the former president hugged Nasser Shaer, a senior Hamas politician, meeting participants said. Embraces between men are a common custom in Arab culture.
“He gave me a hug. We hugged each other, and it was a warm reception,” Shaer told The Associated Press. “Carter asked what he can do to achieve peace between the Palestinians and Israel … and I told him the possibility for peace is high.”
For terrorist peace is one surrender and cut-and-run by America away. Why is Carter giving presidential meetings to terrorists who don’t deserve even entry into this country of ours? Is he the useful idiot of Hamas as some have claimed?
Muhammad Nazzal, an Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) terror group official in Syria, told the Associated Press that Carter had sent an envoy to Damascus requesting a meeting with their exiled leader Mashaal. Hamas “Welcomed the request.â€
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said of Carter’s meeting, “US government policy is that Hamas is a terrorist organization and we don’t believe it is in the interest of our policy or in the interest of peace to have such a meeting.” Assistant secretary of state David Welch spoke with the 82-year-old Carter before his trip and asked him not to meet any representative of Hamas.
No it is not. If you cannot pass a security check to enter this country your not the kind of person we should be negotiating with. In fact, we should be hunting you down. Carter is an old fool but he is providing America an important foil between McCain and the two Surrendercrats opposing him. We can waste time talking to terrorists as they plot to kill thousands of us or we can eliminate them before they can attack. Carter is showing us the foolishness and naiveté of the Surrendercrats which, in the end, leave terrorists alive and well and safe from our justice. And on the other side of we have Crocker, Petraeus and Bush showing us how to destroy the terrorists and bring democracy and hope to the region, leaving terrorist very little to survive off of.
This choice doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out.
We learned that the Jihadis were greatly impacted by the weakness they saw when we left Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia.
Do Leftists consider this? Nope.. they want to add another surrender to that this… only this time they want to surrender a fight that the Jihadis themselves have declared to be their most critical and important front in their fight against us.
Morons you Leftsts you are… damn ignorant seditious fools.
We learned that the Jihadis were influenced by the weakness they saw when we left Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia.
Do Leftists consider this? Nope.. they want to add another surrender to that this… only this time they want to surrender a fight that the Jihadis themselves have declared to be their most critical and important front in their fight against us.
Morons you Leftsts you are… damn ignorant seditious fools
We learned that the Jihadis were influenced by the weakness they saw when we left Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia.
The muslims were influenced by the weakness when we left Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia.
Do Leftists consider this? Nope.. they want to add another surrender to that this… only this time they want to surrender a fight that the Jihadis themselves have declared to be their most critical and important front in their fight against us.
Morons you Leftsts you are… damn ignorant seditious fools.
Do Leftists consider this? Nope.. they want to add another surrender to that this… only this time they want to surrender a fight that the Jihadis themselves have declared to be their most critical and important front in their fight against us.
Morons you Leftsts you are… damn ignorant seditious fools.
This should have been the first sentence of my last postL:
“The muslims were influenced by the weakness when we left Vietnam, Lebanon”
Somalia
So you guys know the word: “S.om.a.l.i.a.” (the country) causes the blog to eat your post.
Vince man, Sorry about that one! I had no idea Somalia could trap a post. Wish I had control over the list of key words (I can only add them., not delete them).
Cheers, AJStrata
Can you delete all of my aborted tries?
Yeah, but I don’t have the time right now. Is it important?
AJStrata
Wel it makes it look like i’m crazy but it could wait
Vince,
Those who know you here know you’re not crazy and the rest …who cares!
Here is what the Israeli mainstream Haaretz said:
“It is doubtful whether it is possible to complain when an outside observer, especially a former U.S. president who is well versed in international affairs, sees in the system of separate roads for Jews and Arabs, the lack of freedom of movement, Israel’s control over Palestinian lands and their confiscation, and especially the continued settlement activity, which contravenes all promises Israel made and signed, a matter that cannot be accepted. The interim political situation in the territories has crystallized into a kind of apartheid that has been ongoing for 40 years. In Europe there is talk of the establishment of a binational state in order to overcome this anomaly. In the peace agreement with Egypt, 30 years ago, Israel agreed to “full autonomy” for the occupied territories, not to settle there.
These promises have been forgotten by Israel, but Carter remembers.
Much closer to the hard to take truth than what the American
warmongers have to say on the subject.
I wonder if Mince considers Reagan seditious. He said the biggest mistake he made as president was not removing the Marines from Beirut, but sending them there.
Too awful bad. I just heard something about a heroic attack on another occupier (not in Iraq), perhaps related to Jimmy’s visit.
Some beg to differ
http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD189708
So there are self-hating Arabs who represent a minute percentage of their people? Thankfully, generations of Palestinian resistance
have at least frazzled Israel opinion to the point where many if not most Israelis consider the settlers as fanatics worthy of removal from the occupied territories.
One could say the same of your quotes there “truth”.
And of course, whatever Palestinians think of themselves, does not entitle them to their own “alternative” version of history and events, nor can they absolve themselves from their own contributions, failures and wrong doing in it.