http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html

“After a six-week lull since the last Democratic primary,
Pennsylvania voters were so eager to participate in the hotly contested battle between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama that one in 10 voting Tuesday had changed their party registration since the start of 2008 so they would be eligible to vote in the Democratic race. The contest was open only to registered Democrats. About half the party-switchers had been registered Republicans, while the rest had been unaffiliated with either party or were voting for the first time in Pennsylvania.”

They switched party in order to vote. Now the AP article would have you believe that Republicans were switching to vote as Democrats because they want a Dem in office… highly, highly unlikely. The more the MSM pushes this as fact the more the left can scream “stolen election” when the dems don’t win in the general. Some things never change…

That might very well be. Here in Indiana you just vote. No one registers as anything. But then again, if you switch your registration back and forth, how can call you yourself a Republican or a Democrat or an Independent.

I did hear that in Indiana they might challenge you if you try to vote Democrat and you have a history of voting Republican, but I really do not see how they can do that. A friend of mine is a lifelong Democrat and is running in the primary for Commissioner. I like the guy and he is honest and I was thinking of voting for him, to do that I would have to vote in the Democratic primary.

Now in the general, you just walk in, show your ID, sign the book and vote.

BTW, I noticed that a lot of Republicans showed up and voted in the Republican race too. Not as many as Democrats ofcourse, but more than I expected to see.

This is going to be the lesson of 2008 .. there is a limit to what money can buy (or voters get tired of the same commercials coming on over and over again).

One could easily argue that the “Boss” was right with “57 Channels (And Nothin’ On)” as 57 channels of Obama is nothin’ on.

Clinton’s win in Pa. leaves Obama battered, party reeling

It just seems like buzzards eating buzzards or something.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/opinion/23wed1.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin

Another point – Obama outspent Hillary 2-1, but it doesn’t seem to have done much good.

Big spending by a campaign isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be. Sometimes it’s just pouring a lot of deluded people’s money down the drain.

http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/2008/04/gee_he_really_i.html#comments