<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Hillary Suspends Campaign, And The Mythical Michelle Obama &#8220;Whitey&#8221; Video Became Public &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mascamote</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-338162</link>
		<dc:creator>mascamote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-338162</guid>
		<description>(Reposting from the home page or wherever I mistakenly put this. Just joined, finding my way about).

Hillary is widely reported to have â€˜quitâ€™ or â€˜withdrawnâ€™ or has â€˜ended her campaignâ€™ and so on.

Iâ€™m not an American, at least not a US citizen, though I am of the Americas, so a bit of elucidation would be appreciated. As far as I know Hillary has â€™suspendedâ€™ her campaign an I think that means staying on the ballot come convention time? If thatâ€™s right, what she did seems more like idling the motor, keeping her delegates and seeing what happens between now and the convention.

Some states allow their delegates to vote as they wish, especially on a second ballot, as far as I know, and I think the â€™superdelegatesâ€™ are not bound by anything - they can vote any way they want even on the first ballot.

If all the above is right, arenâ€™t we looking at Hillaryâ€™s staying in the race with the motor idling ready to pick up the nomination if Obama slips, if another skeleton appears, if he polls badly against McCain in the interim and so on?

Wouldnâ€™t quitting have involved her â€˜endingâ€™ rather than â€™suspendingâ€™ her campaign; wouldnâ€™t she have released her delegates to switch to Obama? She did neither.

Ponder, perhaps, that â€˜endingâ€™ the campaign was an option deliberately not exercised. 

It was a clever speech. She surely cottoned early to which phrases were eliciting boos at the mention of Obamaâ€™s name and she used â€˜em good and she used â€˜em often. If they were already in the script when the booing started she could have avoided repetition. Nah. She reminded the women of America that they had been thwarted and she used code like â€˜I intend to carry onâ€™ and â€˜I will be in the front linesâ€™ and â€˜Iâ€™ll be there for youâ€™ and so on.

Her speech hit her partisan supportersâ€™ nerve endings and paid enough measured lip service to Obama to be off the hook if he gets the nomination then loses to MCain. Of course, he doesnâ€™t have the nomination, sheâ€™s still on the ticket until the end â€¦ note end â€¦ of the convention. She can play those good excerpts later though to prove how â€™supportiveâ€™ she was.

Oh, and there&#039;s Obamaâ€™s Boos Problem (I know, bad pun).

Obama has a boos problem within the Democratic party. There were lots of boos from Hillaryâ€™s audience at the mention of his name. There are a lot of smart women and others around who can figure that if Obama loses in November sheâ€™s the heir presumptive for 2012 when her age is still viable. McCain will be nearing 80. If Obama wins and is two term, Hillaryâ€™s hopes are toast. This can be seen as â€˜women are toast for a decadeâ€™. And for those who donâ€™t figger that out for themselves, is it possible that there will be plenty of Hillary operators to explain it? I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Reposting from the home page or wherever I mistakenly put this. Just joined, finding my way about).</p>
<p>Hillary is widely reported to have â€˜quitâ€™ or â€˜withdrawnâ€™ or has â€˜ended her campaignâ€™ and so on.</p>
<p>Iâ€™m not an American, at least not a US citizen, though I am of the Americas, so a bit of elucidation would be appreciated. As far as I know Hillary has â€™suspendedâ€™ her campaign an I think that means staying on the ballot come convention time? If thatâ€™s right, what she did seems more like idling the motor, keeping her delegates and seeing what happens between now and the convention.</p>
<p>Some states allow their delegates to vote as they wish, especially on a second ballot, as far as I know, and I think the â€™superdelegatesâ€™ are not bound by anything &#8211; they can vote any way they want even on the first ballot.</p>
<p>If all the above is right, arenâ€™t we looking at Hillaryâ€™s staying in the race with the motor idling ready to pick up the nomination if Obama slips, if another skeleton appears, if he polls badly against McCain in the interim and so on?</p>
<p>Wouldnâ€™t quitting have involved her â€˜endingâ€™ rather than â€™suspendingâ€™ her campaign; wouldnâ€™t she have released her delegates to switch to Obama? She did neither.</p>
<p>Ponder, perhaps, that â€˜endingâ€™ the campaign was an option deliberately not exercised. </p>
<p>It was a clever speech. She surely cottoned early to which phrases were eliciting boos at the mention of Obamaâ€™s name and she used â€˜em good and she used â€˜em often. If they were already in the script when the booing started she could have avoided repetition. Nah. She reminded the women of America that they had been thwarted and she used code like â€˜I intend to carry onâ€™ and â€˜I will be in the front linesâ€™ and â€˜Iâ€™ll be there for youâ€™ and so on.</p>
<p>Her speech hit her partisan supportersâ€™ nerve endings and paid enough measured lip service to Obama to be off the hook if he gets the nomination then loses to MCain. Of course, he doesnâ€™t have the nomination, sheâ€™s still on the ticket until the end â€¦ note end â€¦ of the convention. She can play those good excerpts later though to prove how â€™supportiveâ€™ she was.</p>
<p>Oh, and there&#8217;s Obamaâ€™s Boos Problem (I know, bad pun).</p>
<p>Obama has a boos problem within the Democratic party. There were lots of boos from Hillaryâ€™s audience at the mention of his name. There are a lot of smart women and others around who can figure that if Obama loses in November sheâ€™s the heir presumptive for 2012 when her age is still viable. McCain will be nearing 80. If Obama wins and is two term, Hillaryâ€™s hopes are toast. This can be seen as â€˜women are toast for a decadeâ€™. And for those who donâ€™t figger that out for themselves, is it possible that there will be plenty of Hillary operators to explain it? I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Steve</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336721</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336721</guid>
		<description>If this preview is anything to go by, the video is pretty hot stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this preview is anything to go by, the video is pretty hot stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Are Stupid - Part 2 &#171; The Reluctant Optimist</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336187</link>
		<dc:creator>People Are Stupid - Part 2 &#171; The Reluctant Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336187</guid>
		<description>[...] today may just be Michelle Obama, who is rumored to have used the word &#8220;whitey&#8221; in a racist diatribe at her former church while flanked by the wonderful Reverend Wright and the even more wonderful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today may just be Michelle Obama, who is rumored to have used the word &#8220;whitey&#8221; in a racist diatribe at her former church while flanked by the wonderful Reverend Wright and the even more wonderful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OK, Does This Michelle Obama &#8220;Whitey&#8221; Tape Exist Or Not? &#171; Beltway Snark</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336183</link>
		<dc:creator>OK, Does This Michelle Obama &#8220;Whitey&#8221; Tape Exist Or Not? &#171; Beltway Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336183</guid>
		<description>[...] bloggers are also getting supposed transcripts from this tape. IMO, this isn&#8217;t real until I see the video for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloggers are also getting supposed transcripts from this tape. IMO, this isn&#8217;t real until I see the video for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamaicans.com Owner/Webmaster Blog &#187; Michelle Obama&#8217;s Rumored whitey comments and McCain&#8217;s Hug</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamaicans.com Owner/Webmaster Blog &#187; Michelle Obama&#8217;s Rumored whitey comments and McCain&#8217;s Hug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336174</guid>
		<description>[...] to describe white people/George Bush. There is a dispute about the tape and also some people saying she said &#8220;Why&#8217;d he&#8221; (referring to George Bush). For example &#8220;Why&#8217;d he let New Orleans drown?&#8221;. This tactic is similar to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to describe white people/George Bush. There is a dispute about the tape and also some people saying she said &#8220;Why&#8217;d he&#8221; (referring to George Bush). For example &#8220;Why&#8217;d he let New Orleans drown?&#8221;. This tactic is similar to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obama whitey &#124; Wonderful Article</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336167</link>
		<dc:creator>obama whitey &#124; Wonderful Article</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336167</guid>
		<description>[...] how to get their hands &#8230;The Hill&#039;s Blog Briefing Room - http://briefingroom.thehill.com&#124;&#124;&#124;If Hillary Suspends Campaign, And The Mythical Michelle Obama &#8230;Food for thought. BTW, I made a category for the Michelle Obama â€œWhiteyâ€ Video posts in the off [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how to get their hands &#8230;The Hill&#39;s Blog Briefing Room &#8211; <a href="http://briefingroom.thehill.com" rel="nofollow">http://briefingroom.thehill.com</a>|||If Hillary Suspends Campaign, And The Mythical Michelle Obama &#8230;Food for thought. BTW, I made a category for the Michelle Obama â€œWhiteyâ€ Video posts in the off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary will suspend, not concede &#124; The Anchoress</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336160</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary will suspend, not concede &#124; The Anchoress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336160</guid>
		<description>[...] cover up his many weaknesses, save his live pressers for editing, etc. Many people suspect that the mythical &#8220;Michelle/Whitey&#8221; video is out there and being held by the Clinton campaign for strategic timing. IF that is true, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cover up his many weaknesses, save his live pressers for editing, etc. Many people suspect that the mythical &#8220;Michelle/Whitey&#8221; video is out there and being held by the Clinton campaign for strategic timing. IF that is true, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updated Story: â€œNew and Dramatic Developmentsâ€ on the Michelle Obama â€œWhiteyâ€ Video &#171; The Obambi.com Blog (www.obambi.com)</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336147</link>
		<dc:creator>Updated Story: â€œNew and Dramatic Developmentsâ€ on the Michelle Obama â€œWhiteyâ€ Video &#171; The Obambi.com Blog (www.obambi.com)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336147</guid>
		<description>[...] deniability, as I explained yesterday, would be Clinton signaling the â€™suspensionâ€™ of her campaign (not the â€˜endâ€™) and waiting to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deniability, as I explained yesterday, would be Clinton signaling the â€™suspensionâ€™ of her campaign (not the â€˜endâ€™) and waiting to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Ready for &#8220;Whitey&#8221; Sweetie &#171; The Obambi.com Blog (www.obambi.com)</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336146</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Ready for &#8220;Whitey&#8221; Sweetie &#171; The Obambi.com Blog (www.obambi.com)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336146</guid>
		<description>[...] deniability, as I explained yesterday, would be ClintonÂ signalingÂ the â€™suspensionâ€™ of her campaign (not the â€˜endâ€™) and waiting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deniability, as I explained yesterday, would be ClintonÂ signalingÂ the â€™suspensionâ€™ of her campaign (not the â€˜endâ€™) and waiting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZEITGEIST</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-336133</link>
		<dc:creator>ZEITGEIST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-336133</guid>
		<description>[...] THE SUN WILL COME OUT, TOMORROW -- at least if the Hillary camp has anything to say about it. What&#039;s taken them so long? It&#039;s not like they haven&#039;t had plenty to work with. Maybe it&#039;s all about plausible deniability. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] THE SUN WILL COME OUT, TOMORROW &#8212; at least if the Hillary camp has anything to say about it. What&#8217;s taken them so long? It&#8217;s not like they haven&#8217;t had plenty to work with. Maybe it&#8217;s all about plausible deniability. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Here Comes The Michelle Tape - Right After The Last Primaries</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-335946</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Here Comes The Michelle Tape - Right After The Last Primaries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-335946</guid>
		<description>[...] deniability, as I explained yesterday, would be ClintonÂ signalingÂ the &#8217;suspension&#8217; of her campaign (not the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deniability, as I explained yesterday, would be ClintonÂ signalingÂ the &#8217;suspension&#8217; of her campaign (not the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never Yet Melted &#187; More About Michelle Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Whitey&#8221; Tape</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-335944</link>
		<dc:creator>Never Yet Melted &#187; More About Michelle Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Whitey&#8221; Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-335944</guid>
		<description>[...] tip to AJStrata. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tip to AJStrata. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarbaraS</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-335926</link>
		<dc:creator>BarbaraS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-335926</guid>
		<description>OT just read on Fox that Trinity church has gotten at least 15 million dollars from the government over the last 15 years in grants.  There you go, our tax payer money given to people who hate and subvert us.  No wonder the church can afford to give Wright a 10 million dollar house.  Well folks, we paid for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT just read on Fox that Trinity church has gotten at least 15 million dollars from the government over the last 15 years in grants.  There you go, our tax payer money given to people who hate and subvert us.  No wonder the church can afford to give Wright a 10 million dollar house.  Well folks, we paid for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frogg</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-335911</link>
		<dc:creator>Frogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-335911</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if there is a tape, or what was said.   But, the thing that bothers me at the root of it all is that I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Michelle Obama did say those things.

If this is all fakery.....I hope the rumor dies soon.   If this is truth....I hope the tape is made public soon.   If some media has been sitting on it......we definately need to know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if there is a tape, or what was said.   But, the thing that bothers me at the root of it all is that I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Michelle Obama did say those things.</p>
<p>If this is all fakery&#8230;..I hope the rumor dies soon.   If this is truth&#8230;.I hope the tape is made public soon.   If some media has been sitting on it&#8230;&#8230;we definately need to know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarbaraS</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5495/comment-page-1#comment-335730</link>
		<dc:creator>BarbaraS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=5495#comment-335730</guid>
		<description>Since it seems Obama supporters are acknowledging that such a tape exists I&#039;ll bet Obama put this rumor  out there.  Why else would they admit usch a thing?  He has a history of these kind of tactics and what better way than this to destroy Clinton once and for all. That way he wouldn&#039;t have to name her VP or in his cabiniet.   He puts out rumors of a tape then proves the said tape is totally innocuous.  A nefarious Clinton ploy.  And the cream of the jest is that he got Larry Johnson as rumor monger.
Either she did or he did it. I don&#039;t believe the RC would put any mention of it out there now if they had it.  They would wait until October 31.  Surely they have learned something from the democrat shenigans over the last few decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it seems Obama supporters are acknowledging that such a tape exists I&#8217;ll bet Obama put this rumor  out there.  Why else would they admit usch a thing?  He has a history of these kind of tactics and what better way than this to destroy Clinton once and for all. That way he wouldn&#8217;t have to name her VP or in his cabiniet.   He puts out rumors of a tape then proves the said tape is totally innocuous.  A nefarious Clinton ploy.  And the cream of the jest is that he got Larry Johnson as rumor monger.<br />
Either she did or he did it. I don&#8217;t believe the RC would put any mention of it out there now if they had it.  They would wait until October 31.  Surely they have learned something from the democrat shenigans over the last few decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

