<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Weird!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565</link>
	<description>High Flying Political Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:06:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces Â» Blog Archive &#187; The Gorelick Wall &#38; Sandy Berger, Update XIV</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-338178</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces Â» Blog Archive &#187; The Gorelick Wall &#38; Sandy Berger, Update XIV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-338178</guid>
		<description>[...] Which confirms AJ Strata&#8217;s suspicion&#8217;s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which confirms AJ Strata&#8217;s suspicion&#8217;s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Able Danger Hearings Part III</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-4474</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Able Danger Hearings Part III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-4474</guid>
		<description>[...] 29th Item: Army searched more than 15 modern, open source databases - which are more expansive - and using the tools of today. They looked at Nov 1999 to May 2000 thinking that was the period of interest. They did not apparently come up with &#8216;the&#8217; Atta we all know from 9-11. Now the one problem I have with this is data mining is part art. tweak a few search parameters and you get a different result. And I suspect they did not seed the process correctly. These people forgot the Brooklyn cell was built around known people from WTC I, where linkages began with these people and spread out from there. And that is how you can trip over Mohamed Atta. The newer systems may be able to discern like named individuals and throw away a link that an older system may have found and accidentally linked in Atta. That is why luck is always part of this. The re-runs using new data mean very little. In fact, since the panelists say they took Garland data to the newer SOCOM facility, ran it and apparently did not get a &#8216;Brooklyn cell&#8217; shows me they botched these re-runs. No one should have missed the Brooklyn Cell since many of them are known terrorist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 29th Item: Army searched more than 15 modern, open source databases &#8211; which are more expansive &#8211; and using the tools of today. They looked at Nov 1999 to May 2000 thinking that was the period of interest. They did not apparently come up with &#8216;the&#8217; Atta we all know from 9-11. Now the one problem I have with this is data mining is part art. tweak a few search parameters and you get a different result. And I suspect they did not seed the process correctly. These people forgot the Brooklyn cell was built around known people from WTC I, where linkages began with these people and spread out from there. And that is how you can trip over Mohamed Atta. The newer systems may be able to discern like named individuals and throw away a link that an older system may have found and accidentally linked in Atta. That is why luck is always part of this. The re-runs using new data mean very little. In fact, since the panelists say they took Garland data to the newer SOCOM facility, ran it and apparently did not get a &#8216;Brooklyn cell&#8217; shows me they botched these re-runs. No one should have missed the Brooklyn Cell since many of them are known terrorist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJStrata</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>AJStrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-3841</guid>
		<description>Dilbert_G

Yes, I was aware that Chertoff was the lawyer for a Magdy el-Amir, who is no relation to Mohamed el-Amir Atta.  My guess is the data mining effort connected the like names, then other more real connections figured in determining Atta was a terrorist which the tripped over through sheer coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dilbert_G</p>
<p>Yes, I was aware that Chertoff was the lawyer for a Magdy el-Amir, who is no relation to Mohamed el-Amir Atta.  My guess is the data mining effort connected the like names, then other more real connections figured in determining Atta was a terrorist which the tripped over through sheer coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dilbert_g</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-3838</link>
		<dc:creator>dilbert_g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-3838</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Strata,
My tinfoil is in the kitchen.  Thanks for the info that Mohammed Atta might really be Mohammed El-Amir.

Unless you went beyond this point of &quot;Now I am not saying Chertoff did anything wrong&quot;, and I didnt see this on your previous post, then you won&#039;t yet know this:  Chertoff not only &#039;overlooked&#039; the connection, but Chertoff was Magdy El-Amir&#039;s LAWYER.  

Maybe you already got that somewhere else, and I missed it.  The records of the State&#039;s case against El-Amir are online, and Michael Chertoff -- a Fed Prosecutor and at one point on the Whitewater prosecution -- stepped up to the plate to defend El-Amir.  Not only did he escape inquiry into who owned the &quot;unnamed offshore accounts&quot; where the money disappeared, but ALL charges were dropped and he got to keep the money.

Furthermore, there was about a month overlap when Chertoff was running Operation Green Quest tracking terrorist financing, while simultaneously defending a man accused of financing terror.

I have not yet read the book &quot;The Big Wedding&quot; which allegedly was a code name for 9-11, but the author discussed that in an interview.

You might want to pick up the video Mohamed Atta and the Venice Flying Circus.  Catchy title, similar topic.

I have links to it lo-fi on my site look for Daniel Hopsicker on my site, http://www.Takeoverworld.info. 

The Left-Right paradigm is as phony as the Republican-Democrat split.  It&#039;s a sort of &quot;PR&quot; mind-control to get people arguing about nonsense, like the old-fashioned shell game.  Just keep your focus off the real action.

I think what you see in the media is mostly cartoons of real people.  September 11 is TOO IMPORTANT to crash on partisan bickering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Strata,<br />
My tinfoil is in the kitchen.  Thanks for the info that Mohammed Atta might really be Mohammed El-Amir.</p>
<p>Unless you went beyond this point of &#8220;Now I am not saying Chertoff did anything wrong&#8221;, and I didnt see this on your previous post, then you won&#8217;t yet know this:  Chertoff not only &#8216;overlooked&#8217; the connection, but Chertoff was Magdy El-Amir&#8217;s LAWYER.  </p>
<p>Maybe you already got that somewhere else, and I missed it.  The records of the State&#8217;s case against El-Amir are online, and Michael Chertoff &#8212; a Fed Prosecutor and at one point on the Whitewater prosecution &#8212; stepped up to the plate to defend El-Amir.  Not only did he escape inquiry into who owned the &#8220;unnamed offshore accounts&#8221; where the money disappeared, but ALL charges were dropped and he got to keep the money.</p>
<p>Furthermore, there was about a month overlap when Chertoff was running Operation Green Quest tracking terrorist financing, while simultaneously defending a man accused of financing terror.</p>
<p>I have not yet read the book &#8220;The Big Wedding&#8221; which allegedly was a code name for 9-11, but the author discussed that in an interview.</p>
<p>You might want to pick up the video Mohamed Atta and the Venice Flying Circus.  Catchy title, similar topic.</p>
<p>I have links to it lo-fi on my site look for Daniel Hopsicker on my site, <a href="http://www.Takeoverworld.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.Takeoverworld.info</a>. </p>
<p>The Left-Right paradigm is as phony as the Republican-Democrat split.  It&#8217;s a sort of &#8220;PR&#8221; mind-control to get people arguing about nonsense, like the old-fashioned shell game.  Just keep your focus off the real action.</p>
<p>I think what you see in the media is mostly cartoons of real people.  September 11 is TOO IMPORTANT to crash on partisan bickering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-656</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why was Atta singled out as significant by ABLE DA&lt;/strong&gt;

Boy if I was asking questions I think it might be pretty interesting to ask the Able Danger folks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why was Atta singled out as significant by ABLE DA</strong></p>
<p>Boy if I was asking questions I think it might be pretty interesting to ask the Able Danger folks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pink Flamingo Bar Grill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-635</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why the Able Danger story is important and why we&lt;/strong&gt;

Destroying the 9/11 Commissions timelines and putting Atta in Prague during the time period that the Czech Foreign Service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why the Able Danger story is important and why we</strong></p>
<p>Destroying the 9/11 Commissions timelines and putting Atta in Prague during the time period that the Czech Foreign Service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patch</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>patch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 01:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-633</guid>
		<description>AJ,

Let me really get the investment in tinfoil rolling. 

 New Jersey is considered the source of the anthrax attacks that happened right after 9/11.

Are we in Rod Serling territory yet?

This might be freaking wild.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ,</p>
<p>Let me really get the investment in tinfoil rolling. </p>
<p> New Jersey is considered the source of the anthrax attacks that happened right after 9/11.</p>
<p>Are we in Rod Serling territory yet?</p>
<p>This might be freaking wild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-631</guid>
		<description>It very much looks like there is little about the 9/11 final report you can trust, it&#039;s all political. That&#039;s too bad, because this time we are in a real struggle, the consequences of failure can be bad. If we can&#039;t accurately define what went wrong, how do we know we have fixed the underlying systemic problems.

My suggestion . . . maybe the only thing we can count on anymore is open source blog journalism -- we surly know we can&#039;t trust the AP to report objectively. After reading the recent flood of biased AP wires, we need a way to unmask AP reporters. They now hide behind an anonymous byline. Who are they? What axe do they have to grind? What are their qualifications to do reporting? Why won&#039;t they stand in the sunshine and defend their reports?  The public has a right to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It very much looks like there is little about the 9/11 final report you can trust, it&#8217;s all political. That&#8217;s too bad, because this time we are in a real struggle, the consequences of failure can be bad. If we can&#8217;t accurately define what went wrong, how do we know we have fixed the underlying systemic problems.</p>
<p>My suggestion . . . maybe the only thing we can count on anymore is open source blog journalism &#8212; we surly know we can&#8217;t trust the AP to report objectively. After reading the recent flood of biased AP wires, we need a way to unmask AP reporters. They now hide behind an anonymous byline. Who are they? What axe do they have to grind? What are their qualifications to do reporting? Why won&#8217;t they stand in the sunshine and defend their reports?  The public has a right to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJStrata</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>AJStrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 23:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-630</guid>
		<description>What is sad about all this is we let the 9-11 commission make us believe they had done some exhaustive and open minded analysis...

Silly us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is sad about all this is we let the 9-11 commission make us believe they had done some exhaustive and open minded analysis&#8230;</p>
<p>Silly us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austindeadhead</title>
		<link>http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/565/comment-page-1#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>austindeadhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 23:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strata-sphere.com/blog/?p=565#comment-629</guid>
		<description>AJ, you find the most interesting stuff...interesting that the Inside 9/11 documentary didn&#039;t mention Atta&#039;s previous name...it was otherwise so thorough!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ, you find the most interesting stuff&#8230;interesting that the Inside 9/11 documentary didn&#8217;t mention Atta&#8217;s previous name&#8230;it was otherwise so thorough!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

