What I don’t understand, AJ, is why is the National Park Service
going into full bureaucratic cover mode and trying to ram this thing
through? I guess you might understand stuff like that. Please explain
it to us.

If this monument ever gets built, I suggest that every visitor buys
a little toy pig and leaves it there, with a sign on the pig, “we know”.

“The only Islamic symbolism that remains in the memorial is that which is perpetrated by the conspiracy theorists themselves,” Hanley said.

No, they never admitted there was Islamic symbolism in the original Crescent of Embrace design before, but they all knew it.

Last summer I was told by Professor Tim Baird, a member of the Memorial Project’s Advisory Commission, that EVERYONE in the project is fully aware of the factual accuracy of my Mecca orientation claim. They have all just decided that it must be a coincidence and that that makes it okay (even as they lie to the public, telling the press that the Mecca orientation claim is FALSE).

Of course they also know that the Islamic symbolism is still there, since they only disguised the original design by including a chunk of the broken off part of the circle. Still, they aren’t about to quit. To tackle the hijacker, we are boing to have to knock the blockers out of the way.

Now Phoenix was the home of some of the Flying Imams..but it is not clear how much input they had into that version.

It’s an easy deal.
Do not sit this one out. Semper Fi

Let’s talk more in email – you have mine, right? Would be honored to meet Mr. Burnett.

People also need to know that the giant crescent points to Mecca, and that this Mecca-orientation is repeated in the crescents of trees that surround the crescent-shaped Tower of Voices part of the memorial.

This repetition proves that the Mecca orientation is intentional. That makes the giant crescent a mihrab: the Mecca-direction indicator around which every mosque is built. Some mihrabs are pointed arch shaped, but the archetypical mihrab is crescent shaped.

The planned memorial will be the world’s largest mosque by a factor of a hundred. This is a radical Islamic attack on the United States, every bit as ambitious in its own way as 9/11.

There are numerous other Islamic and terrorist memorializing features in the design. A few are listed at CrescentOfBetrayal.com, with simple instructions for verification, starting from source documents.

AJ: if you are able to make the trip, please let me know. Not only will Mr. Burnett and I very much want to meet you, but we may be able to direct some news coverage your way. A major problem we have been facing is that we can’t get the media to actually check and report the facts.

We manage to get something like our Mecca-orientation claim into a news story, and it gets followed by a phony academic claiming that “anything can point toward Mecca, because the earth is round.” The press then let’s this blatant deception stand. They can’t be bothered to ask one of the world’s one billion Muslims whether it is true that there is no such thing as the direction to Mecca, and so the masquerade continues.

If you would fact-check a couple of our claims: (like the Mecca orientation of the crescent; or the fact that the 9/11 date is to be inscribed on a separate section of Memorial Wall that sits in the exact position of the star on an Islamic flag), then Tom and I can cite that independent fact-checking via your press-release/blog post.

Another example. Numerous articles have noted our claim that there are 44 memorial blocks on the flight path (when the flight carried 40 passengers and crew and 4 terrorists). This claim is always followed by a Memorial Project denial. In two and a half years, I haven’t been able to get a single reporter to simply open up the design drawings and count the blocks.

Tom and I need to break this embargo on fact-checking. ANYBODY who is willing to fact-check ANY of our claims, please issue a “press release,” be it as a blog post, blog comment, or whatever, and let me know.

This is something anyone can do, whether or not you can make it to Somerset. An army of fact-checkers would break the media embargo and bring this down. Tom and I will get the news coverage. Give us something to direct it to.

Go to:
http://errortheory.blogspot.com/
and
http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/

I don’t know. I look at it and I see a design I see elsewhere. I mean all this production almost makes it seems like the terrorist win. We can’t have a Memorial with a curve or semi Circle anymore

THis all seems too much like the stuff I watch on the history channel where the streets are Washington are suppose to look like a Pentagram and other Masonic lore.

IN other words you can see anything

THe SOuth Carolina Flag has a Cresant
http://www.50states.com/flag/scflag.htm

That is not really a Cresant. I mean I understand if people want a different design but I am not seeing a red cresant there

I looked at the picture and I did not see a crescent, I saw a semi circle. That is what I saw. I have seen the crescent on flags etc and I know what a crescent moon looks like. That did not look like a crescent to me. It looks like a theater, a ball park, something like that. People see different things.

One of the nicest memorials I ever saw was the one OKlahoma City where the Federal Building was bombed. Something like that would be more appropriate.

I said that if it bothers people they should change it.