Feb 16 2009
Global Warming Liars
The Washington Post has printed complete lies about Global Warming as facts, even though the lies are so obvious anyone with a HS Earth Science class education could find them. Here are the lies:
The pace of global warming is likely to be much faster than recent predictions, because industrial greenhouse gas emissions have increased more quickly than expected and higher temperatures are triggering self-reinforcing feedback mechanisms in global ecosystems, scientists said Saturday.
…
Field, a member of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said emissions from burning fossil fuels since 2000 have largely outpaced the estimates used in the U.N. panel’s 2007 reports. The higher emissions are largely the result of the increased burning of coal in developing countries, he said.
Emphasis mine. First off, note that the 2007 ‘report’ underestimated the CO2 production over the last 7 years (now 9). So the real story here is, once again, the IPCC predictions (even when using hindsight!) are wrong. The essence of this hysteria driven dribble is that CO2 production is much worse than reported by the IPCC. Therefore the IPCC models are underestimating the CO2 forces on global temperature, which means over the last 9 years things clearly got much worse than even the Priests at the Church of Al Gore/IPCC predicted!
Except, of course, they did not get worse. Here is a NOAA global temperature chart for the period where the Washington Post and these quasi-scientists claim we had out of control CO2 production. See anything wrong here (click image for larger version)?
What should be jumping out at everyone is that, as the CO2 production was careening out of control (Oh My God!), the Earth has been cooling off dramatically. From the peak warm year in 1998 we have seen an increasing COOLING of the global climate. So how is it the IPCC underestimated 9 years of CO2 production (which their models no doubt show an out of control global bake out) and yet the actual data shows the opposite.
Well, it could be Mother Nature doesn’t believe in the UN’s global warming mythology. Or it could be the yahoos at the UN IPCC and their minions like NASA’s Hansen are so badly wrong in the theories they should be the laughing stock of the world. Yeah, from where they are sitting it sure looks like things are crashing in all around them.
As you well know AJ , NASA is getting ready to put up a few birds up there to give us a much better handle on the data compared to the models.
Then it’s going to be able to take out a lot of the bias in the data from sensor distribution and density for temps and rainfall and other things including co2 distribution and such.
It will give better confirmation or not of the models outputs.
At that point it will give more weight to who you gonna believe the model or you lying eyes.
This whole global warming campaign began as one trying to minipulate data to recieve funding. Now its about minipulating the data to gain global power, where the UN can create an organization that will have control over sovereign countries such as ours. That’s what Gore is about, can’t be Pres of the USA so he try and become leader of an organization that can control our GDP and sovereignty.
So who exactly is going to refute this? With the entire PRAVDA media on board, what’s to worry about. The truth doesn’t matter, it’s only if your version of the truth gets out there, to quote Howard Dean.
Truth now comes in versions.
There is no doubt in my mind that Al Gore is trying to sabatoge America. And this administration is doing that, as well, imho. See the article written on the Cloward-Piven strategy over at AmericanThinker.com…we have discussed it before but it is so relevant to bring it out again…
And I like Macmind’s idea about what to do….
G-d bless this great country, my America, the Beautiful and cloak us all in protection from these craven, power-hungry socialists.
The Global Warming crisis was invented right after the Alar in the Apples scare was proven false. Leaders of the national dissident groups, none of whom are concerned about the causes they claim to espouse, got together and decided that the enviroment was the issue under which they could rally the most people to support their stated cause, “to Unite all Dissident groups and empower them to overthrow the government.” They put their whole combined efforts into turning out pseudo scientific reports, articles, news conferences, etc, written by peoepl with doctorates in areas other than science (Psychology, Religion, etc.) to support their claim that man could controol the climate and was destroying it. The environment was chosen as the cause because everyone has ,or has had, some god awful thing in their area. IE: The ash pond that recently collapsed in TN flooding out and destroying a whole town. A toxic landfill or incinerator. A business emptying its polutants into the local serwer system which found it’s way into streams and water ways. The perputators knew it was a phoney from the start but they knew they could panic people over impending death from polution. I know this is true because I was on the Board of Directors of a national “environmental” organization when this policy was adopted.
The big question is….In our race to curtail “Green House gasses” especially carbon dioxide which is necessary for plant growth, are we in danger of curtailing to production of foods necessary to feed the world’s growing populations. IN nature for every action there is a reaction. Whem carbon dioxide increases, plant growth incrases to counteract it and produce oxygen. Just what is it about this that these so called environmentalist scientists don’t understand?
I’ve added a link to your article as a resource for Discerning Science – Global Warming – The Debate
Here’s a piece by John Coleman, KUSI San Diego:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/john_coleman_vs_al_gore.html
John has pointed out that Roger Revelle is the originator of the self induced man made global warming theory.
There are hundreds of scientists that dispell this theory, but their scientific evidence is being shunned. This is a scary path that we are on when the truth does not prevail.
AJ,
You should send your article to the Washington Post.
They might print it.