Comments on: Truth Commission’s First Victim: Speaker Nancy Pelosi

By: kathie

kathie — Sat, 16 May 2009 03:20:23 +0000

…..and Gibbs says Obama just wants to look forward, when questioned about the CIA flap and Nancy, not his business. I’ve got it, Obama starts something and when the shit hits the fan he wants to look forward. I’m wondering, did he read the memo before he declassified it? Or the alternative is that he is just detached from reality.

Obama proposes a budget that brakes the bank, and then has the audacity to say at ASU, that we can’t sustain deficits. No wonder the Republicans are looking like crazies. It is as if he is not responsible for anything. Without a media, his guy, dressed in a nice suite, a big smile, is going to really think he is a messiah, the untouchable. This is really sick, it’s hard to get your mind around what is going on.

By: Frogg

Frogg — Sat, 16 May 2009 02:17:24 +0000

Unreal. Another Lie… Now Pelosi Lies About Calling CIA Liars (Video)
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/05/busted-speaker-pelosi-caught-in-another.html

By: Frogg

Frogg — Fri, 15 May 2009 17:29:48 +0000

It’s a change of subject; but, you’ll like this, AJ:

Pete Sessions & the NRCC Have a Plan for 2010
http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/05/15/pete-sessions-the-nrcc-have-a-plan-for-2010/

By: Frogg

Frogg — Fri, 15 May 2009 16:40:54 +0000

DEMS: CIA Briefers May Have Broken the Law
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22531.html

By: Frogg

Frogg — Fri, 15 May 2009 16:17:30 +0000

Most excellent article:

The Torture Debate, continued (by Charles Krauthammer)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/14/AR2009051403603.html

By: kathie

kathie — Fri, 15 May 2009 16:09:36 +0000

Frogg……it’s too delicious to contemplate. But the truth does seem to raise to the top.

By: Frogg

Frogg — Fri, 15 May 2009 15:35:16 +0000

That reminds me of something else I sense. If the Dems go this route of “The CIA lied”/”The CIA mislead” and it is later proven wrong…..

will it bring back memories of “Bush lied”/”Bush mislead”??? And, might that change some public perspectives in retrospect on what that Dem chant was really all about? Just wondering.

By: Frogg

Frogg — Fri, 15 May 2009 15:28:04 +0000

This looks like it may become an out and out Dem strategy and turn into a very real DEM/CIA war:

Graham: CIA Gave Me False Information About Interrogation Briefings
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/14/graham-cia-gave-me-false_n_203683.html

By: pjo

pjo — Fri, 15 May 2009 13:53:08 +0000

She continues to violate the first of rule of digging your self into a hole, namely she continues to dig and her hole keeps getting bigger.

AJ, wrong anti, want to guess which one you should you use?

A) Auntie
B) Ante

By: kathie

kathie — Fri, 15 May 2009 11:19:08 +0000

I heard an interesting comment this morning. One of the reasons that aides are sent to briefings is so that the congressman can deny that they were briefed. Isn’t this the situation with Nancy. But then you have to ask, why on such an important issue, would the congressman not want to be counted as present? I guess this is an inside the belt way thing. They all do it.

By: daniel ortega

daniel ortega — Fri, 15 May 2009 10:56:06 +0000

Dear Mr. Strata,

Will Nancy Pelosi be prosecuted? I think that your system needs
the chief prosecutor of Washington DC to file charges, but he is
a democrat too and appointed by Mr. Obama. He might do nada?
I think you cannot force the prosecutor to prosecute? Something like
happend here in England, where the government stopped prosecuting
a big defence company over charges of corruption in it’s deals with
the Saudi Arabia. Some people were really mad and went to court but
the court said it is for the government (they call it the Crown Prosecution
Service) to decide who they prosecute. And that is that. Maybe it
is different in the USA?

It is also remarkable that in just as a few days, Mr. Obama changes
his orders about the photos and keeps them back and today in the
news he is saying he will let there be military trials for the prisoners
in the Guantanamo Bay jail. His Left friends will be very angry.

I cannot prove but I suspect someone, and I remember your famous
movie, made him an offer he couldn’t refuse. Maybe someday we
will know but not tomorrow.

By: Terrye

Terrye — Fri, 15 May 2009 04:00:03 +0000

Pelosi just walked right into this. It makes me wonder if she is stupid or somethint. Why would the CIA lie about this? They have nothing to gain.

By: Terrye

Terrye — Fri, 15 May 2009 03:59:13 +0000

ph2ll:

I heard Liz Cheney say something to the effect that a lot of people in the Bush administration, and I took that to mean Bush as well were listening to lawyers. Even now Holder is talking about cooperating with some Spanish judge to go after Bush.

I think Bush was too concerned with what he would have to say in public and what the effect of that might have on his presidency. Unlike Obama, he is a responsible person.

By: kathie

kathie — Fri, 15 May 2009 03:11:43 +0000

ph…fighting back works, but look how Cheney is being vilified. It doesn’t matter now because he doesn’t have to govern and protect himself, retirement has some advantages.

By: ph2ll

ph2ll — Fri, 15 May 2009 02:58:20 +0000

kathie, I agree.

As Cheney speaks out and if BO releases classified information then they/Bush will be vindicated. Fighting back works.