Archive for the 'Able Danger/9-11' Category

Aug 15 2005

Able Danger, Danger Speaks? Update XIII

While it appears Rep Weldon may have given his pet issue on Able Danger a few mortal blows this weekend (see here for one), it may be the case the story can (and probably should) go on without him. Rick Moran has a truly fascinating find on the website Intel Dump. Here is the snippet […]

4 responses so far

Aug 15 2005

Weldon A Foot Into Mouth

Those of us remaining few who still want the complete answers on Able Danger have always had a problem in that Curt Weldon was the Congressional face on this topic. Prone to go off half cocked, with a heavy dose of exaggeration thrown in, Weldon can take any issue and in the end over shadow […]

Comments Off on Weldon A Foot Into Mouth

Aug 15 2005

Able Danger, Data Mining Update XII

For those slogging through my posts this will be a present surprise – short and sweat. The Boston Globe has a good article out on a precursor program to Able Danger using Data Mining. One bit of advise – the SW ‘expert’ who claims Data Mining could not identify a target is full of it. […]

Comments Off on Able Danger, Data Mining Update XII

Aug 14 2005

Able Danger, TMI Update XI

It’s bad when you feel the need to update a recently published update (here), but Update X got so long and mixed up it was Too Much Information (TMI). So I decided to follow John Geraghty’s lead and list what we know today. All of this is somewhere in the last update or linked to […]

5 responses so far

Aug 14 2005

Able Danger, Timeline Update X

New Times Article Here (not covered in this post). Keep this DoD statement in mind while going through this post – if you can stay awake long enough to! said a Pentagon spokeswoman, Air Force Lieut. Col. Ellen Krenke. “Clearly there was information that was developed through this program, but it is unclear what was […]

2 responses so far

Aug 13 2005

Able Danger, CYA, Update IX

The defunct, over rated and thankfully boarded up 9-11 Commission has come out with their Able Danger response – and it is a whopping loser [hat tip Ed Morrissey]: “The officer complained that this information and information about other alleged members of a Brooklyn cell had been soon afterward deleted from the document,” the statement […]

3 responses so far

Aug 12 2005

Able Danger, Jersey Girls Update VIII

Well, Jim Geraghty at TKS has now joined the hunt and it is always an eye opener when the professional bloggers jump in with their resources and experienced insight. I was really curious about how the Jersey Girls would respond to the news about Able Danger. I have winced at their push to blame 9-11 […]

2 responses so far

Aug 12 2005

Able Danger, Iraq Update VII

Massive kudos to Ed Morrissey for an excellent find of something absolutely critical to the 9-11 commission’s now bogus conclusions. I was a bit doubtful when the good Captain jumped from the Able Danger story to Iraqi connections to Atta (look whose talking, I jumped straight to Bergler!). But with this find I think the […]

4 responses so far

Aug 12 2005

Able Danger, Gorelick Update VI

This story seems to continue at warp speed and heading straight at Berger/Clarke/Gorelick. First, a reminder that all my posts on this subject can be found here (sorry, some are quite long) Today’s item concerns a reminder by Debrah Orrin at the NY Post that the Gorelick ‘wall’ memo did not go over well with […]

4 responses so far

Aug 11 2005

Able Danger, Atta Update V

Is it possible the 9-11 commission did not want to include the Able Danger reports because they messed up the commission.s well-crafted timeline. A timeline which did not provide opportunity for a meeting in Prague between Atta and Iraq intelligence? That is the new possible revelation coming from an AP story, cited at the NRO […]

One response so far

« Newer Entries - Older Entries »