Apr 15 2008

Pressure Building For Democrat Implosion

Published by at 8:26 am under 2008 Elections,All General Discussions

I have to admit I have enjoyed watching the democrats self destruct this year. It has been slowly building as their once vaulted hopes of riding a defeat in Iraq to the White House have been dashed by not only a path to victory laid before us in Iraq, but the infighting of the left’s two prime identity groups – the only one’s really left – blacks and women. Sadly for these two respected elements of society they each are being represented by lame candidates, and they have helped create the pending low speed train wreck.

Hillary has trouble keeping reality and dreamland straight and can be so condescending one wonders whether she is as smart as every one claims. She is still riding Bill Clinton’s coat tails and the political machine they built from his presidency. Even with all that support she is flailing.

Obama looked to be the better candidate. He was a DC outsider, at a glance he looks stylish and poised. Hilariously he was able to destroy that image with a quick game of bowling where he bowled a ridiculous 37! Geez, how isolated has this man been from America? He was seen as something new, a way to get past the long gone racial divides that primarily exist today as romantic memories in some people’s minds. In the end we learned he was part of that stubborn group that will not let racial tensions die, who cannot get past the upheavals of the last century, who cannot see the progress and only see the US of KKKA.

To this point there was hope for Obama, but when he claimed bitter frustration was the reason for people to believe in God and demand the right to bear arms (just think of these two concepts in the Church of Reverend Wright!!) he exposed the fact he is a far left liberal trying to play a charade on America. That is a two punch blow: First for letting his condescending views about his supporters leak out, but also making it clear he has not been honest with them, basically putting on a show to fool them.

(and I am being generous here, the left is not all that astute at times – but then again the right can be tone death too) are just noticing the fact Obama is seriously damaged for the general election:

Obama comes from a modest background and has tried to appeal as a candidate of both Harvard Law School and Chicago’s Back-of-the-Yards, where he organized laid-off steel workers, but he hasn’t been able to pull it off. His manner, his tenor, and his diction are Harvard Law, and when he starts dropping his ‘g’s,” he sounds strained. And Obama is too young, and lacks the stature, to appear as a Franklin Roosevelt-style father figure.

These difficulties were clear before Obama spoke in San Francisco, but they’re much more glaring now. In the speech, Obama appeared to say that Pennsylvania voters’ opposition to gun control or abortion or immigration or free trade was pathological–a product of what Marxist philosopher Herbert Marcuse once called “false consciousness.” On the other hand, he implied that when he voiced opposition to an issue like free trade–Obama has consistently hammered Clinton on her support for the North American Free Trade Agreement–he was simply pandering to these voters’ displaced anxieties. He was saying to these upscale San Francisco Democrats, “I am really one of you, and I am not one of them.”

Oh, it was much worse than that. But liberals cannot grasp the damage done. And it is getting worse now that Obama’s name has come up in a scandal trial. Last thing America wants is another crooked pol in DC. Even if Obama is not implicated, America will take no chances with the Presidency.

What is really interesting is the Democrats also cannot stop Obama from winning the delegate count for the primaries. As I said, Clinton is such a bad candidate she could take out this neophyte early on. So what is happening is the support between Hillary and Obama keeps solidifying in the two liberal enclaves, each unwilling to take a back seat to the other victimized group (because that is all they represent on the left, victims’ groups). Now with Obama leading in delegates and popular vote he is imploding, putting pressure on the Democrat machine to make a move to save their dreams. They either up-end the primary process and put in Hillary (which would severe the democrats hold on the African American vote) or they put in someone who did not run like Al Bore (and destroy the party forever).

Watching the pressure build week after week is riveting. In one week so much pressure will be built up the entire party is going to be screaming for it to stop. But it can’t stop. The supporters will not back down and the candidates will not back down (and their supporters would not buy it anyway). It is amazing to watch, knowing the Democrats will be a crippled party one way or the other when this thing finally blows.

52 responses so far

52 Responses to “Pressure Building For Democrat Implosion”

  1. missy1 says:

    Here you go Norm, audio and print version as well as highlights of Obama’s big day with his billionaire buds:

    http://www.zombietime.com/obama_visits_billionaires_row/

  2. norm says:

    well missy that’s a great link…thanks…i love it when they blank out the eyes. only it doesn’t actually link to the entire transcript in context. more tellingly…the part of the quote it does show does not say that “…bitter frustration was the reason for people to believe in God and demand the right to bear arms…”

  3. Whippet1 says:

    Norm,
    From Obama’s speech via zombietime:

    “You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, a lot of them — like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they’ve gone through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, and they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

    What is your interpretation of that statement?

  4. norm says:

    whippet…i am not so naive to believe you care one whit about my interpretation…or anyone’s interpretation that does not agree with yours. however, on a very basic level, even those who are challenged by the english language can see that to “cling to” something is not in any way the same as “the reason for” something. “the reason for” something denotes the sole cause. to “cling to” something means to hold on tightly, but does not imply a singular cause and effect. the two are not interchangeable, and the use of “the reason for” is a mis-representation.

  5. truthhard2take says:

    Too bad the nominal “white” is as mediocre a candidate -and more dangerous to boot–than the so-so black yuppie and the coat-riding feminist imposter. You have to go to Nader for consistent quality and a better representative of Arab Americans than the others are for their groupings.

  6. AJ: when the entire rational of your so-called “Political Party” is based upon Surrender, Socialism and Taxes, what do you expect?

    They truly are the party of:

    Hate
    Treason
    Sedition
    Taxes
    Socialism
    Surrender
    Racism

    and thanks to Obama and Hillary and Jimmy Carter, the American people are starting to figure that out, finally…

  7. Dc says:

    Here’s the part he said after “they get bitter”

    “…and they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

    It seem quite clear to me that what he is saying, or more appropriately what he “said”, is that these people cling to these things (guns, religion, antipathy toward people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, anti-trade sentiment) as an expression, or a way to explain, their own bitterness about the way their lives are.

    I can understand why Obama wants to focus on the “bitter” part, or the reasons he feels people are bitter etc., or how they got that way, because it’s the last part of this that really got him in trouble.

    The first part was about why he thinks they are bitter. Some would say…that part also was elitist and leftist in it’s meaning. But, really, it’s quite simple, it’s because of Booooosh.

  8. 75 says:

    Norm’s reaching entirely new dimensions of stupid. Oh Dear God, how I love it so!

  9. norm says:

    please 73…explain yourself. i’d love to hear the reasoning behind your substance free personal attack.

  10. 75 says:

    Your attempts to carry the water for B. Hussein’s comments have been comical in the least and darn right asinine at best. AJ’s assessment is dead on and B. Hussein has an entire history of thinking, acting, associating, and behaving exactly as such. The mere idea let alone fact that you’ve chosen this particular subject to hold your ground just confirms our worst thoughts about your abilities.

    But you did get something right and for that you earn points…no one cares “one whit about your interpretation.”

  11. The Macker says:

    75,
    “dimensions of stupidity” was aptly described by Clarice Feldman as:

    “If voters get even slightly more ignorant we will have to do what they do in the Third World–just vote for emblems…Cow/Sun, etc.”

    Case in point: O’Bama trying to explain to his followers what the word “bamboozled” means.

  12. VinceP1974 says:

    It’s only understandable that Obama would view these people as being bitter.

    Wouldn’t you think everyone is bitter when you go to a church that has a rabidly bitter Anti-american former muslim as a pastor?

    You associate with bitter leftists as the University of Chicago

    You associate with bitter aged hippy terrorists who used to bomb Washington DC

    You’re wife is an angry embittered Affirmation Action case

    One of your heros is the bitter Louis Ferrakhan

    Your mother is a bitter Communist

    Your father is a angry bitter Muslim fundamentalist

    Your step father is an angry bitter Muslim fundamentalist

    Your mother’s father is a bitter lazy old man

    This is the world Obama comes from. Only a fool would support this empty suit.

  13. norm says:

    yawn…

  14. 75 says:

    That’s exactly right, Vince. He’s the perfect candidate for our left brethren here…an entire career made on pure hatred and bigotry. And Norm Worm Tongue has the gall to whine about personal attacks. His very candidate thrives on them.

  15. Whippet1 says:

    Norm,

    So we can now add mind reader to your list of qualifications along with military expert, accountant extraordinaire, mideast expert, etc. etc.

    And since you are simply parsing words you are conveniently avoiding the entire point of the statement that Obama made.

    So let’s cut to the chase… Obama said ” it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, and they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

    What does that mean to you?

  16. truthhard2take says:

    Macker

    Does Feldman’s assurance the Iraq War had tunred the corner several years ago qualify her as stupid?

  17. The Macker says:

    Truthy,
    Which corner?

    As long as the Left cheers the enemy on, there will be more corners to turn.

  18. Whippet1 says:

    Truthy,

    “Does Feldman’s assurance the Iraq War had tunred the corner several years ago qualify her as stupid?”

    No. But it does show she has amazing insight.

  19. 75 says:

    Truthfully, the corner in the Iraq War was turned long ago. I’d say what is happening now is reconstruction, rebuilding, reorganizing, and reconsolidating. Reeducation, of course, takes much longer for the Truth’s and Norms of the world.

  20. Dc says:

    I”ll repeat it again as evidently…it has yet to be addressed by anyone (including Obama)

    “…and they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”