Jul 17 2008
More Proof Obama Birth Certificate Is Not A Forgery
I love the fact all the Obama Birth Certificate myth peddlers provide clear evidence there is no forgery. The latest proof comes from Texasdarling, who provides further evidence that the Hawaii Department of Health has been performing a lot of upgrades to their vital records systems, as I claimed a few posts back. Just check out the images of all these COLBS from HI:
You can see the full image here. Â What we see here is more myth-busting evidence. One of the claims the BHO COLB was a forgery was the fact the border edges do not line up. In fact in all the COLBS I have looked at they don’t, and now we have proof that is not a sign of forgery. Â Stick a fork in that theory.
Second, we see that color is not an indication of forgery, since none of the colors match. Â Kill that theory.
Finally, we see that the size of the hatch patterns do not always match – clearly HI went from smaller to larger diamonds at some point since 2005. Scratch another theory.
The forensic expert at Atlas Shrugs, Techdude, supposedly is analyzing multiple COLBS and I would guess this is a hint at which ones he is looking at. This is what he said in his last missive on this subject:
Unlike AJ I just happened to have been lucky enough to have had more than just the Decosta image to work with so that I am able to see the progression of the document modifications through time. (I also called Hawaii and talked to them about it)Â But f rom AJ’s point of view his observation would be correct having not seen a 2006, other 2007’s, or 2008 COLBs.
OK, so we clearly have in the set above 3 COLBs from sometime before the end of 2006 (the smaller hatching) and two from sometime after that period. OK, big deal. Â Based on all the silly speculation that border patterns, border alignments, border color, etc. prove tampering it is clear from above that this is just not the case. I am still awaiting Techdudes final ‘report’, but I am seriously skeptical he will do more than confirm, again, what I have been saying. Â All the ‘telltales’ people are harping about are easily explained and none prove a forgery was ever made.Â
Myth still busted, for now. BTW, I added a category for this silliness for folks who want to see all my posts.
Update: The new COLB from Michelle is here. I cannot detect a date stamp from the back, nor a seal imprint or signature area as I could with the BHO COLB. Based on previous ‘logic’ this must mean this a forgery.
Update: I was finally able to detect the signature area bleeding through from the back, it overlaps the bottom border. And I was able to discern (barely) the COLB is a 2008 version. Can’t make out the month. I see I was correct – June 2008.
There was a scan of the reverse on Texasdarlin’s blog a short time ago. I’ll look for it now.
Here it is:
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/micheles-colb-chain-of-custody-handling/
I’ve looked at it in Photoshop in various ways but cannot see the seal – even though it’s been scanned from the correct side.
Ray,
You are correct, no seal? But the signature area was right where I thought it was.
Amazing. No seal, must be a forgery!
AJStrata wrote:
“Ray,
You are correct, no seal? But the signature area was right where I thought it was.
Amazing. No seal, must be a forgery!”
======
Ah, you’d never make a good conspiracy theorist. Too much science has apparently been drummed into you.
The new certificate is obviously a plant by Obama’s wife, who has infiltrated the Texasdarlin site and changed her name from Michelle to Michele – thinking no one would see through it.
There’s no flies about us conspiracists – we spot stuff like that in a flash! It’s this sort of attention to detail that will guarantee the survival of conspiracists long after the cockroaches have all died-off, after the nuclear explosion happens when Sputnik One returns to earth.
Michelle (aka “Michele”) has either:
(a) arranged for the seal-less COLB (an inside job).
(b) Used poly-filler on the indentations in a real COLB
(c) Forged the 2008 border. It looks *too* good.
When you look at “Michele’s” COLB the one thing that strikes you is that (apart from the border) it is virtually ah-DENT-ical to the other forgery :-))
:-))
AJStrata wrote:
“Ray,
You are correct, no seal? But the signature area was right where I thought it was.
Amazing. No seal, must be a forgery!”
=============
The seal has now become visible on Polarik’s site with much fanfare. It was apparently in the document all along but Polarik had the invisible-ink-pixels turned off.
[UPDATE]
Yes, if you turn on the invisible-ink-pixels you can see the seal we were looking for 🙂
http://i355.photobucket.com/albums/r478/RayAus/untitledseal.jpg
[…] http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5674 […]
http://errortheory.blogspot.com , a big fan of strata, has a good article
on how that New Yorker cover isn’t satire, but rather maximum likelihood
of truthful portrayal of Obama. Fake bc or not.
Given that everything about Obama is a lie, it’s possible
that so is his bc. Or maybe not. Pixels notwithstanding, all he has
to do is the same thing Kerry wouldn’t do – release the paper record.
I noticed one of the posters said how could anyone be so arrogant as
to demand to see proof of his citizenship by his birth records?
I say how can Obama be so arrogant as to run for public office and refuse
a reasonable request for proof of his bonafides.
One notices, one does, that Kerry never released his military records.
and,
One notices, one does, that Hillary has still not released her delegates.
The errortheoy conclusion: Obama is a secret islamist, New Yorker depicts
that with maximum probablility of describing the real Obama accurately.
dave m wrote:
“Given that everything about Obama is a lie, it’s possible
that so is his bc. Or maybe not. Pixels notwithstanding, all he has to do is the same thing Kerry wouldn’t do – release the paper record.”
.
If he not prepared to put his hand on his chest for a flag, there’s no way he’s going to bow to a tiny bunch of lying trolls.
dave m wrote:
“The errortheoy conclusion: Obama is a secret islamist, New Yorker depicts that with maximum probablility of describing the real Obama accurately.”
Obama was brought up as a white boy with black skin and had to LEARN how to be black later in life. His father was a semi-disinterested Muslim, but he never knew his father.
His Indonesian step father was a Muslim but sent him to a Catholic school in Indonesia for 2 years. Obama only went to a Muslim school after his mother and step father moved house and found that the nearest school was a state run Muslim school (which most Indonesian schools are – because they are religious people).
So yes, Obama would still remember enough of Islam to have proper respect for Muslims and their way they do things – but that would be a GREAT asset for any politician in this era — not something to slam him for or lie about.